Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Question Is, Do You Want To Keep It?
Chuck Shiflett ^ | October 21, 2007 | Chuck Shiflett

Posted on 12/09/2007 6:39:31 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

In last week's column I highlighted comments made to the Financial Times of London by U.S. Comptroller General David Walker in which he compared the current political, social, and economic situation in the United States to that of the Roman Empire shortly before its collapse.

I heard from a number of readers in response to the column… Democrats, Republicans, and Libertarians. While a couple of folks used the opportunity to plug a particular presidential candidate or legislative issue, almost all were in agreement that things in our nation must change drastically and quickly.

Despite a booming economy, low unemployment, and a stock market near record highs… most people feel a sense of gloom and a greater disconnect from their government than I have ever witnessed. This is verified in a recent Reuters/Zogby poll that shows President Bush's approval rating falling to 24%. Think that's bad? Nancy Pelosi's Democrat congress has an approval rating of only 11%.

If you drill down deep into various polling data, you'll find that most Americans are furious with Bush over his failure to deal with illegal immigration. Then you have liberals who want us out of Iraq and conservatives who believe Bush didn't allow the military to hit hard enough in the first few months of the war and now we have a quagmire. Then we have continued runaway federal spending by donkeys and elephants.

In response Democrats gained control of both houses of Congress, only to have America say, "Hey we let you in because we were mad at Bush and the GOP… not because we want socialism." Many Americans feel as though they now have no voice remaining in national matters.

For the next few minutes let's lay aside political party, economic status, race, religion, and all the other multitude of differences that politicians are all too adept at exploiting. Keep an open mind and look at each issue from the standpoint of what is good for the long-term health of our nation even if it negatively impacts you personally. Here are some changes that might help America reverse course.

Money In Politics: Only allow federal candidates to receive contributions from individuals, and that would be capped at $2,000 per contributor per election cycle. No more political action committee donations. No more money spent by political parties or third parties on behalf of candidates… and wealthy candidates could only spend one dollar of their own money for every ten they raise from others.

Term Limits: I've never been sold on the idea, but obviously Congress would not pass restrictions on campaign contributions like those above, so I guess our next step is to force them out after a few years.

Abolish The 17th Amendment: Under the U.S. Constitution as adopted the people elected U.S. House members to represent their interests. However the public did not vote for their U.S. Senators. The senators were appointed by their respective state legislatures to represent and protect the interests of the various state governments. This was designed to keep the federal government from overreaching with unfunded mandates that would unduly burden the states, etc. However, in 1913 the 17th Amendment was passed that allowed public election of the Senate and it has been all downhill from there.

Change the Presidency: It's ridiculous for the next presidential campaign to start the day after a president is sworn in for his term of office. Let's elect our Presidents to a single six-year term, and prevent potential candidates from raising money or forming exploratory committees until twelve months before the next general election.

Additionally there is no Constitutional right to vote in a presidential primary, though most states hold them. Let's abolish primaries and let each political party hold conventions at the state level to select delegates. Then the national party conventions would once again become the place where nominees are chosen instead of being the obscene beauty contests we have today. Hold the national conventions in July and the presidential nominees would then have at least three months to campaign… no more of these four-year long debacles.

Re-Constitutionalize The Federal Government: I'm not sure if re-constitutionlize is even a word, but I'll take credit for it. Somebody drop a line to Webster's for me. Our founders envisioned each state as an incubator for new ideas with the Constitution guaranteeing free trade between the states.

Current federal programs such as Social Security, Medicaid, SCHIP and other entitlements… or even federal funding of education or transportation should have never have been allowed constitutionally. As envisioned by our founders, states would compete against each other on tax rates, social programs, etc. If New York wants to provide healthcare for all of its residents, and Virginia doesn't want to cover any of its citizens… then that's fine. Let the free market decide which state will be most successful.

It would have been easy for me to harp on specific legislative solutions to some of our problems, but the truth is… until we correct the flaws in our system of electing Congress and the President… and also guide our nation back to adherence of the Constitution as our founders intended, we'll never have the national will to do anything more than put bandages on the problems facing us.

Upon adjournment of the Constitutional Convention, when a citizen asked Benjamin Franklin what type of government the founders had given us… Franklin said, "A republic, if you can keep it." Today the question should be, "Do we want to keep it?" If the answer is yes, are you willing to work to make the necessary changes?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; 17thamendment; 1913; bigspenders; campaignfinance; congress; constitution; conventions; corruption; democrats; earmarks; elections; federalism; gop; parties; politics; porkbarrel; presidency; president; primaries; republicans; senate; senators; states; statesrights; termlimits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2007 6:39:34 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Chuck Shiflett is a smart guy. I like all his points.

Let’s do it.


2 posted on 12/09/2007 6:47:45 PM PST by donna (Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And this is going to save us from falling like the Roman Empire, huh? Since there doesn’t seem to be much consensus on what exactly caused the downfall of the Roman Empire, it’s interesting to see these solutions.


3 posted on 12/09/2007 6:51:41 PM PST by Laptop_Ron (It takes a villager to raze a village)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Good stuff. I especially like this.....

Current federal programs such as Social Security, Medicaid, SCHIP and other entitlements… or even federal funding of education or transportation should have never have been allowed constitutionally. As envisioned by our founders, states would compete against each other on tax rates, social programs, etc. If New York wants to provide healthcare for all of its residents, and Virginia doesn't want to cover any of its citizens… then that's fine. Let the free market decide which state will be most successful.

4 posted on 12/09/2007 6:56:02 PM PST by abigailsmybaby (I was born with nothing. So far I have most of it left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
You won’t do any of those things unless we get more news outlets that aren’t infested with commies.
5 posted on 12/09/2007 7:02:06 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Some of his suggestions are on the mark but the only kind of campaign finance I think makes sense is to ban contributions from anyone not eligible to vote for the candidate. If you run for Congress from Kansas’ 2nd District you get all your contributions from residents of Kansas’ 2nd District and none from anybody else.
6 posted on 12/09/2007 7:02:50 PM PST by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In my humble opinion he missed the most fundamental tax reform. Congress should continue to pass an annual budget which then should be apportioned out the the 50 states on a per capita basis. The states would then collect the required money and transfer it to Congress. Deficits are not allowed. Of course, the states could withhold funds for projects which they did not agree with. Congress would have no authority to levy taxes.

If I am correct, this was how it was under the Articles of Confederation.
In his list, the most important reform is TERM LIMITS. There should be no professional politicians.

7 posted on 12/09/2007 7:09:53 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I tend to disagree with Pat Buchanan about half of the time, but his new book seems to point toward many of the same things that Shiflet is saying and I am in agreement with both men.

The US is in trouble and Buchanan has nailed a vast majority of the reasons. Where Shiflet seems to fall short with the sampling of solutions he presents is that he doesn’t mention anything about shrinking both the size and influence of the federal government to conform more with the vision of the Founding Fathers. Also, he doesn’t address the horrible tax structure we have, the bloated national debt (albeit shrinking), and the theft and re-direction of taxes collected for specific programs (gas tax and SS come to mind).

For my own $0.02 worth, not only would I like to see term limits imposed on all elected positions, I would also like to see them imposed on federal judges, especially the SCOTUS. At present, we have no way to get rid of SC justices who shouldn’t be on the bench. I propose a term of 10 years with the option to be re-appointed for a second 10 year term. I also propose that Congress be prohibited by law from transferring its regulatory and taxing authority to other agencies that have no accountability to the taxpayers.

Finally, I would like to see Congressional sessions limited to 6 months every other year. This cuts down on a lot of the shenanigans and grandstanding they engage in and requires them to focus on the business of the country. If needed, the president should have the authority to call then into special sessions. And, while I’m at it, I want the Capitol to be occupied for only 1 of those 6 month sessions. Communications technologies today are more than capable of providing all of the services required for the Congress to meet and keep the representatives and senators in their home districts. This way, they have to live in the mess they make, instead of isolating themselves in Washington where they insulate themselves from the people who put them there.

/rant


8 posted on 12/09/2007 7:19:29 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A good question to those who would love to see it go the way of the Roman Empire would be: do you want to live in the world that is run by China, Russia and Europe fighting over who will grab what?


9 posted on 12/09/2007 7:21:26 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
>>
For my own $0.02 worth, not only would I like to see term limits imposed on all elected positions,..
<<

While I agree with the desired outcome, here is the fatal flaw with term limits: imagine the entire government run the way the State Department is run, that is by an entrenched bureaucracy. The issue with term limits is that the pols who come and go cannot stay long enough to gain an institutional memory. They must rely on the ever-present staff employees, who know that pols will come and go, so they can do almost whatever they please. Term limits only increase the power of the bureaucrats who become even less responsive to citizens because citizens have almost no power over them.

10 posted on 12/09/2007 7:25:18 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron
Since there doesn’t seem to be much consensus on what exactly caused the downfall of the Roman Empire, it’s interesting to see these solutions.

Success caused its downfall.

11 posted on 12/09/2007 7:32:17 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

As envisioned by our founders, states would compete against each other on tax rates, social programs, etc.


Repeat LOUD and OFTEN.

At a Fred Thompson meeting I asked why he called himself a federalist. In his answer he talked about the importance of states competing.


12 posted on 12/09/2007 8:01:20 PM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

You make a good point but, IMO, that’s a simple enough fix - clean house. When the politician goes, so does the herd of barking dogs who supported him (staff) other than the admins who can train his replacement how to turn the computer on and access pending bills.

Without a crew of “Yes men and women” anround to tell the moron how to think, he/she may actually have to write their own speeches.

I know that’s an overly simplistic answer to a complex problem, but the rot at all levels of government has to stop. The best way to stop rot is to replace all the rotten components.


13 posted on 12/09/2007 8:04:51 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Starting in 2010, 401Ks for politicians and judges. Let the taxpayers do a 6% match and then give ‘em a rollover whenever they leave. Gotta grandfather the current bunch or they won’t vote for it.

Right now they can screw up the country and not have to worry about their retirements - now at the taxpayers’ expense, complete with COLAs. Maybe if their own future was as stake like ours, they’d be a little more careful on how they voted.


14 posted on 12/09/2007 9:02:42 PM PST by Oatka (A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
If I am correct, this was how it was under the Articles of Confederation.

You do know the Articles of Confederation were replaced because they were not allowing for an effective Government?

I like his ideas about Campaign finance reform. Term limits often seem to me to be a solution in search of a problem.

15 posted on 12/10/2007 3:08:38 AM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Bingo. Most people are rationally ignorant of politics, which is (in part) why we were supposed to have a government of limited powers kept in check by a free press.

Allowing a government with virtually unlimited powers in such a large country without a free press is a formula for despotism because it is impossible to keep track of what the lying thieves in DC are doing unless you are accurately informed.

But since the press is no longer free (in the sense of presenting competing opinions), but almost monolithically leftist, we need an amendment to restore press freedom by licensing journalists and/or fining media outlets for bias in reporting, etc.

16 posted on 12/10/2007 8:46:40 AM PST by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

read


17 posted on 12/10/2007 8:47:44 AM PST by sauropod (Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

This is the point. It’s not about WANTING to keep it; it’s that we are definitely starting to LOSE “it” (federalism). We need to go back to states’ rights and to find some compromise re free speech/elections/money. I believe that this triangle may need some sort of Constitutional amendment. I believe the founders, if alive, would be huddled over this one, what with immediate countrywide information spread that we have today.

Someone else said that nothing will happen as long as we have dumbing-down driveby media, and there is a good point to this. But we need to fight for it anyway. Will President Fred Thompson have the cojones to put aside the urgent for the Very Important and try to sit down with the American people and explain it to them? Without a serious leader, nothing will change. Americans need to understand that we are at a crossroads and need to make sure we move in the direction the country was intended, toward freedom, and clean up the money-power-election fiasco which is leading us to oligarchy and feudalism.


18 posted on 12/10/2007 9:01:28 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Another idea could be a school of journalism that would somehow crank out freedom-loving constitutionalists. In other words, not indoctrinate.


19 posted on 12/10/2007 9:03:32 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Success caused its downfall.

Hmmm... since success caused the fall of Rome, then if we destroy most of America's success, then we won't fall like Rome did! See? The Left really does have America's best interests at heart!!

20 posted on 12/10/2007 9:09:57 AM PST by Teacher317 (Eta kuram na smekh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson