Posted on 11/26/2007 12:08:20 PM PST by crazyshrink
It’s not a smoking gun, but it’s smoking-related, and it’s there in bright medical images: evidence of microscopic structural damage deep in the lungs, caused by secondhand cigarette smoke. For the first time, researchers have identified lung injury to nonsmokers that was long suspected, but not previously detectable with medical imaging tools.
The researchers suggest that their findings may strengthen public health efforts to restrict secondhand smoke.
“We used a special type of magnetic resonance imaging to find these structural changes in the lungs,” said study leader Chengbo Wang, Ph.D., a magnetic resonance physicist in the Department of Radiology at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “Almost one-third of nonsmokers who had been exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke for a long time developed these structural changes.” Formerly at the University of Virginia, Wang collaborated with radiology researchers at that institution, where they acquired the MRIs from adult smokers and nonsmokers.
Wang presented the team’s findings in Chicago at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Although the participants in the research study were adults, Wang said the results have implications for the 35 percent of American children who live in homes where regular smoking occurs.
The researchers studied 60 adults between ages 41 and 79, 45 of whom had never smoked. The 45 non-smokers were divided into groups with low and high exposure to secondhand smoke; the high-exposure subjects had lived with a smoker for at least 10 years, often during childhood. The 15 current or former smokers formed a positive control group.
The research team prepared an isotope of helium called helium-3 by polarizing it to make it more visible in the MRI. Researchers diluted the helium in nitrogen and had research subjects inhale the mixture. Unlike ordinary MRIs, this MRI machine measured diffusion, the movement of helium atoms, over 1.5 seconds. The helium atoms moved a greater distance than in the lungs of normal subjects, indicating the presence of holes and expanded spaces within the alveoli, tiny sacs within the lungs.
The researchers found that almost one-third of the non-smokers with high exposure to secondhand smoke had structural changes in their lungs similar to those found in the smokers. “We interpreted those changes as early signs of lung damage, representing very mild forms of emphysema,” said Wang. Emphysema, a lung disease that is a major cause of death in the U.S., is commonly found in heavy smokers.
The researchers also found a seemingly paradoxical result among two-thirds of the high-exposure group of non-smokers—diffusion measurements that were lower than those found in the low-exposure group. Although these findings require more study, said Wang, they may reflect a narrowing in airways caused by early stages of another lung disease, chronic bronchitis.
“To our knowledge, this is the first imaging study to find lung damage in non-smokers heavily exposed to secondhand smoke,” said Wang. “We hope our work strengthens the efforts of legislators and policymakers to limit public exposure to secondhand smoke.”
### The study received financial support from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute, the Commonwealth of Virginia Technology Research Fund, and Siemens Medical Solutions.
Wang’s co-authors were Talissa A. Altes, M.D., and Kai Ruppert, Ph.D., now of the Children’s Hospital Radiology Department; and G. Wilson Miller, Ph.D., Eduard E. deLange, M.D., Jaime F. Mata, Ph.D., Gordon D. Cates, Jr., Ph.D., and John P. Mugler III, Ph.D., all of the University of Virginia Department of Radiology. Drs. Wang, Altes, and Ruppert were previously at the University of Virginia as well.
That is why I stick with firsthand smoke.
Second hand smoke causes glow-bull warming as well.
What do MRIs show about anal sex?
Saw this at lunchtime on CNN - both hosts and the medical tart were giddy at the prospect of “non-smoking” regulation.
As long as there’s no second-hand anal sex, who cares?
and never exposed to:
outside air
cars
cooking
fireplaces
woodstoves
gas grills
cities
power plants
dust
pets
insulation
asbestos
well... you get it...
during the middle of Clinton’s 2nd term, the world health organization put out it’s 2nd hand smoke report
know what it said ?????????????????????????????
no harm what so ever....it helped in fact as 2nd hand smoke is a very good ANTIOXIDENT..........I swear it
Rush read it on the air
Or, people who wait for the bus on 42nd Street in NYC every day....
Sorry to say this, but you have to be a fool not to think that second hand smoke is bad.
I think the government has no business telling people what they may ingest, but I also think that smokers have no business trying to make me smoke with them.
Carolyn
Duh
Or any other source of lung damaging pollutants.
Two 35 year old studies in early 2000s (UC-Berkeley; UIL-Urbana-Champaign resulted in the findings that there is no conclusive proof that second-hand smoke causes any injury to non-smokers.
American Cancer Society at the time: But we've invested so much in our efforts or some such nonsense... Studies only got a brief mention...squelch!! natch... so now we have a new study with a new control group... anyone check to see if the TESTER is an anti-smoker Nazi...
Lay the hell of the smokers... gosh if there was ever a more persecuted group of people... ACLU... you got a real case.
Not a smoker but so sick of this sh*t.
Sorry to say this, but you have to be a fool not to think that [insert any conventional 'wisdom' here.]
For example: "you have to be a fool not to think that directly injecting yourself with disease agents is bad." (aka vaccines)
RE your tagline...mind if I plagarize?
Hillary to Bill...If you want a warm feeling around me...just pee your pants
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.