Posted on 11/14/2007 8:47:41 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Defense: Fred Thompson wants a million-man ground force and more modern equipment on the ground, in the air and on the water. The arsenal of democracy needs some retooling.
After the Vietnam conflict, the U.S. military was depleted and exhausted. Then came Jimmy Carter and by the time Ronald Reagan came along we had planes that couldn't fly and ships that couldn't sail for lack of maintenance.
The Gipper rolled up his sleeves and built his 600-ship navy, gave the Air Force the latest fighters and bombers and an Army capable of deploying half a million troops for Desert Storm without breaking a sweat.
Once again the U.S. military is depleted and exhausted. We no longer have the force that Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf had. During Operation Desert Storm, the active duty Army had 18 combat divisions. Clinton cut them down to 10, about their size today. As of March, the active Army consisted of about 508,000 troops, far below the 780,000 we had while Reagan was winning the Cold War.
A year ago, President Bush recognized the need for a bigger stick not only in Iraq but around the world. "We need to increase the permanent size of both the United States Army and the United States Marines," he said. "I've asked Secretary Gates to determine how such an increase could take place and report back to me as quickly as possible."
Speaking at The Citadel Tuesday, presidential candidate Thompson proposed a military ground force of 775,000 in the Army, near Reagan-era levels, and 225,000 Marines, 23,000 more than the Pentagon currently is seeking.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
That was my first thought when I heard this. Fred is spot on.
That was a good article. My husband, an AF vet, has been thrilled to hear Fred’s views on rebuilding the military.
What are his views on the economic aspect of our relationship with China? They recieved a multi-decade technology boost sold to them by the clintons and as long as we keep feeding their economy through unfair trade practices they should be able to maintain it seems to me...
Fred wants to increase size of military. Cut pork. No amnesty for illegals.I like what I am hearing.
Freegards,
Lex
Fred Thompson has brought forth a real plan with real teeth to increase the military. I told you all that if Conservative forces united behind Thompson, we could have another Conservative revolution as we did in the 80's. His strength at the polls against Hillary will pull House and Senate seats back to the Republicans. Hopefully, whipping all the RINOS up for reelection this time, and then complete the task when each comes up for reelection (including McCain) when it is his time.
The tide is turning ladies and gentlemen, will you be a part of this Conservative victory or a part of the downturn of the Republican party by supporting Giuliani or Romney? Fred will be our candidate…but he will need our help. Will you help or stick you head in the sand in fear?
Revitalizing America’s Armed Forces
Fred Thompson’s Plan to Strengthen the Long Term Security of the United States
The threats to the United States today are more complex, dispersed, and opportunistic than ever before. Terrorists and terror states observe no rules and have no restraints of conscience. The enemy understands only the language of power. While the central front in the war against Islamic extremism is in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is clear that our enemies extend far beyond those borders. The gravest danger is terrorists or terrorist states acquiring weapons of mass destruction. But other, more traditional, more conventional challenges await us as well. To overcome these dangers, we need a clear and consistent strategy to address them, and the means to be successful.
With the fall of the Soviet Union, many falsely assumed that unquestioned American military superiority was unneeded. Indeed, many Democrats saw the 1990s as an opportunity to take a holiday from history, and as a consequence, our government began one of the largest unilateral reductions of military power in history. Our Armed Forces were cut 30 percent on average. Army combat power was reduced by nearly half, the Air Force down-sized considerably, and the Navy could not maintain 300 ships, much less the 600-ship Navy that President Reagan once envisioned. We are still feeling the effect of these reductions today.
No one will ever doubt the quality of those who serve our nation in the Armed Forces. The brave men and women who comprise our military have answered every call to duty and defended our freedom with honor. During my days in the Senate, I had the privilege to spend time with them as I traveled abroad to meet with world leaders, visit global hotspots, and gain a better understanding of events on the ground in far-away places. Whether at an outpost in Kosovo with U.S. Army troops; watching flight operations with the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aboard an aircraft carrier in the Indian Ocean; meeting at a darkened Afghan airfield with special operations forces shortly after 9/11; or flying aboard a cargo aircraft with the U.S. Air Force in South America and South Asia. I am always inspired by the courage, competence, and commitment of our men and women in uniform.
But we are fighting a war in two theaters today, against an enemy not bound by borders, using 20th century equipment in a 21st century war. And our material support for our troops has not matched the demands we have placed on them. Their readiness and capabilities could soon be in doubt. We simply have been asking too few troops to do too much for too long.
It is time for real change, not half measures. As we consider the threats we face today, and the ones we may need to confront tomorrow, we must re-evaluate how we look at our priorities. The first responsibility of the federal government must be the security of the American people and the defense of our nation. This should be reflected in everything we do in the federal government, including, most importantly, the budget. Defense spending declined significantly at the end of the Cold War to levels approaching 3% of GDP, despite the fact that America has historically spent well over 5% of GDP on defense. Over the last several decades our economy has proven strong enough to enable 5.1% spending during the Gulf War, over 6% during the Reagan build up, and over 8% during the late 1960s. As a nation, we must be prepared to spend more on defense than what we do today - and have done in the past 15 years - in order to revitalize the military and develop the capabilities necessary to promote peace, security and stability for future generations of Americans.
To address the problems and challenges faced by our Armed Forces today, the following initiatives will put us on the path to revitalizing our all-volunteer military over the coming years, enable the United States to advance its interests abroad, and ensure the long-term security of our nation for decades:
Be prepared to increase the core defense budget up to 4.5% of GDP to support the expansion, modernization, and increased readiness of U.S. military forces
We must be prepared to increase defense spending, phased in over time, in order to build the forces and develop the capabilities outlined in this plan.
Spending increases would be calibrated to economic conditions, the nation’s ability to access additional troops and modernize the military’s equipment, and the Armed Force’s ability to absorb these capabilities in the most effective manner.
Build a “Million-Member”ground force capable of handling peacetime and wartime tasks without wearing out the troops and increasing U.S. vulnerability.
Increase Army end strength to 775,000 organized into 64 Brigade Combat Teams.
Increase Marine Corps end strength to 225,000.
Provide for the rotational, readiness, basing, and training needs of an expanded force.
Modernize training, tactics, doctrine, and organizations to meet future challenges.
Increase the pay and benefits of our Military Personnel, and the care of our Veterans, to enhance recruitment, retention, and quality of life.
Improve healthcare and housing for service members and their families.
Pass a modern GI Bill that provides service members with ample educational assistance to help recruit and retain our nation’s finest.
Ensure that returning wounded veterans have the best healthcare available, that their families are fully supported, and that bureaucratic red-tape is eliminated
Improve the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense systems by implementing many of the recommendations of the Dole-Shalala Commission and the Veteran’s Disability Benefits Commission.
Enhance the capabilities of America’s Special Operations Forces (SOF) to conduct counter-terrorism, counter-proliferation, and other “special” operations
Enhance SOF’s command, control, and force projection capabilities as the lead for the nation’s irregular warfare and special operations efforts.
Expand SOF endstrength as necessary, without compromising standards.
Improve Psychological Operations and Civil Affairs capabilities.
Increase the U.S. Navy fleet to at least 325 ships to increase mission capability across the full spectrum of operations and maintain the ability to project power globally.
Add a carrier strike group to sustain forward presence in key areas’ Persian Gulf and East Asia - to promote stability and deter conflict.
Improve the Navy’s ability to conduct coastal and riverine operations.
Increase the number and capabilities of our submarine fleet.
Complete the modernization of the U.S. Air Force to ensure continued tactical air dominance over all potential adversaries and the ability to project power globally.
Ensure tactical and strategic air/space superiority over every battlefield and the U.S.
Develop new long-range tanker capabilities that can support U.S. military operations worldwide, 24/7.
Invest in new technologies and systems to support advanced Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, long-range strike capabilities, and extended global coverage.
Upgrade the full spectrum of lift capabilities to improve the mobility of U.S. forces.
Develop robust Missile Defenses to protect the homeland, deployed forces, and allies against ballistic missiles of all ranges in all phases of flight.
Field a layered, multi-tiered missile defense architecture that includes land-, sea-, and space-based components.
Support the development and testing of advanced missile defense technologies to address the complexity of foreign ballistic missile inventories.
Promote international collaboration in all missile defense efforts, to include cooperation in joint development and production with friends and allies.
Increase U.S. intelligence capabilities to ensure the nation’s leaders, and our Armed Forces, have the best information possible in a timely and accurate manner.
Improve intelligence collection, especially human intelligence.
Ensure analysis is comprehensive, exhaustive, and properly “red-teamed.”
Continue to improve intelligence sharing and coordination across the government.
Increase the Intelligence Community’s focus on terrorism and proliferation.
Enhance Counter-Proliferation, Counter-Terrorism, and Cyber Security efforts
Develop new tactics and technologies in each of these areas.
Bolster targeted intelligence and law enforcement resources and work closely with the private sector to ensure national advanced technology assets are protected by state-of-the-art warning and response systems.
Safeguard the security of our network centric and information technology driven weapons and systems as a top priority.
Maintain U.S. leadership and dominance in Space
Make investments necessary to ensure the nation has assured access to space.
Develop advanced satellites for surveillance and communications.
Be able to defend our space-based assets from radiation, cyber, or direct attack.
Integrate space-based systems with our ballistic missile defense system.
Develop the capability to swiftly defeat the offensive space capabilities of potential adversaries.
Ensure the U.S. maintains a safe, effective, and credible strategic deterrent
Maintain complementary land-, sea-, and air-based weapons delivery platforms to ensure the survivability of our nuclear deterrent.
Modernize our existing nuclear weapons capabilities, as appropriate, to deal with 21st Century threats and challenges.
Maintain the lowest level of nuclear capabilities compatible with our national security needs and our international commitments.
Revitalize the nuclear weapons complex so that it is responsive and adaptable to unanticipated threats.
The U.S. military is at a strategic crossroads. Years of neglect, conflict, and long deployments are reducing the readiness, effectiveness and flexibility of the greatest military force in history. It is time to restore President Reagan’s promise of “peace through strength” by making the investments and hard decisions necessary to safeguard the nation’s long-term security. The fact is, we can and must do this.
The world - friends and foes alike - is watching. We cannot afford to allow our forces to wither and risk conflict. The latter is far more expensive in the long run and much more dangerous. The weaker we become, or appear to become, the more our enemies will be tempted to challenge us and our allies. These are risks we cannot afford to take. Whether we act in time to prevent the worst from happening will be the final measure of America’s leadership in the world for years to come. With 9/11 still fresh in our memory, it is for America to shape events, and not be left at their mercy. Wherever dangers appear, we must be prepared to meet them with clarity and resolve. Doing so will take leadership, vision, and a commitment to restore our nation’s military strength.
We paid a terrible price in American blood because of the failures during the Clinton Administration, an
If we are damned to have it repeated in Hillary, I’m afraid the Butcher’s Bill could be much, MUCH higher, from the Middle East, to Taiwan, to here at home...
But fire.....what about the fire? /s
!
Comparing the Cold War and China is like comparing Apples and Bicycles.
Russia was much more of a belligerant than China has been.
Also, whether you agree with the approach or not, by trading with China we are gradually reducing the threat that China could be.
As China accepts more and more of the Capitalist mindset, they have loosened more and more of the vice-grip of control they have historically had on everyday life of their citizens.
Whether or not the approach that the Globalists have pushed the US us in with respect to China will bear the ultimate fruit of a truly free and democratic society is yet to be seen, however, no one can argue that they are not a freerer country then they were before they started to embrace capitalism.
Another big challenge we face with China, unlike with the Soviets, is that Americans do not see China as an enemy or adversary. In fact, the idea seems to be still widely accepted that the smart approach is to reform them by conducting friendly business with them. In the Cold War, the Soviet Union was almost universally regarded as our fundamental enemy.
Good post, you echo my sentiments, and you’ve got a way with words, thanks. Fred Thompson will be our next president!
I think the peace-through-business approach to China has already shown itself a failure. And threatening Los Angeles if we defend Taiwan was fully belligerant enough for me. So was taking and holding our airmen as hostages.
“...expect our next major conflict to involve China on the opposite side.”
Wholeheartedly agree the next major conflict with a Nation-State will involve China.
“Wholeheartedly agree the next major conflict with a Nation-State will involve China.”
Then G_d help us all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.