Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Amateurs Make Foreign Policy
IBD ^ | October 12, 2007

Posted on 10/12/2007 9:14:10 PM PDT by Kaslin

Justice: Of course, it's right to recognize the wrong that the former Ottoman Empire did to the millions of Armenians it slaughtered and deported from 1915 and 1922. That said, does Congress have to recognize it now?


The answer is no. The country that was formed following the Ottoman Empire's collapse in 1922, Turkey, is today a stable, democratic and secular country — and an ally of the U.S. and Europe. Believe it or not, after ours its army is the second-largest in the NATO alliance — bigger than Britain's, France's or Germany's.

More importantly, it straddles a swath of what may be the most strategically important piece of land in the world.

Turkey is situated in both Europe and Asia Minor, guards the oil- rich and strategically vital Black Sea, dominates the back end of the Mediterranean, and shares borders and geography with some of the most troubled spots in the world. These include Iraq, Syria, Iran, the former Soviet Union and parts of Eastern Europe.

How puzzling, then, that the Democrat-led House Foreign Affairs Committee would choose this time to push through a resolution recognizing as genocide the murder of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians at the end of the first World War. We hope the rest of Congress — House and Senate alike — pass on the chance to vote on it.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 1915; 1922; armenians; ottomanempire; pelosi; turkey

1 posted on 10/12/2007 9:14:11 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And the MSM and Democrats have the hypocritical nerve to accuse this administration and Republican controlled Congress of making the rest of the world made at us for our policies.
2 posted on 10/12/2007 9:19:12 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Al Qaeda showed a lot of wisdom on Sept. 11, 2001 when they didn’t crash an airplane into the Capitol building.
3 posted on 10/12/2007 9:29:09 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm not exactly thrilled with what the professionals in the DOS produce in foreign policy either.
4 posted on 10/12/2007 10:05:05 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Al Qaeda showed a lot of wisdom on Sept. 11, 2001 when they didn’t crash an airplane into the Capitol building.

IIRC, that was the target of Flight 93.

5 posted on 10/12/2007 10:05:54 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

A curious thing....I’m wondering if anyone ever did a analysis of what would have happened if the plane had hit the capital...say earlier than the others. How many senators and congressmen were there at that time in the morning, and what might have happened. It might have been a greater drain on public view of America....had 60 senators and 200 congressmen been taken out of action. It would have been weeks before they could sat a majority of senators and representatives down...at some alternate location...and the Patriot Act might have been ten times more stringent than what we have today. Its a interesting “what if” scenario.


6 posted on 10/12/2007 10:15:08 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I didn’t see the movie.

There is still a debate on United 93’s target but this is part of what I found:

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/05/23/flight.93/index.html

http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/attack/cbs_f93target.html

http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/05/23/attacks-flight93.htm

7 posted on 10/12/2007 10:22:51 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

btt


8 posted on 10/12/2007 10:27:44 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

This scenario was explored in Tom Clancy’s “Debt of Honor” and “Executive Orders.” Link below is about a debate on this issue in Congress:

http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/uscongress/a/aanewcongress.htm


9 posted on 10/12/2007 10:32:53 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is nothing but Islamofascist’s propaganda.


10 posted on 10/12/2007 11:09:54 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
This is where the Democrats' foreign-policy meddling and incompetence will get us...

We have got to stop calling Democrat policy toward Islamofascism "incompetence". Incompetence implies their policy does not yield the result they were seeking.

Neither Carter or Clinton was "asleep at the wheel" in combating terrorism. They both had a foreign policy that sought to appease and embrace radical Islamic elements. The Dems want radical Islam to be more influential in the region and the West to be less so. Part of the plan is to weaken our alliances with more moderate Muslim governments like Turkey. Obama threatening to attack Pakistan is out of the same playbook.

If we elect Hillary we will get more of the same.

11 posted on 10/12/2007 11:58:56 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Turkey is attacked now by Democrats BECAUSE it is an ally and has helped the US with Iraq. The two sides in this war face each other just as much in Washington as in Iraq.


12 posted on 10/13/2007 5:19:43 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero

I think you got part of that wrong.

Turkey did NOT help us in our invasion of Iraq.


13 posted on 10/13/2007 5:58:01 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Republicans only win if they are conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Haven’t we been using them for a stageing base?


14 posted on 10/13/2007 8:41:32 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Congress cared at all about condemning genocide they would’ve done this 90 years ago when it actually happened. The fact that they’re bringing this up now says they’re looking to turn an ally against us in the hope of alienating the US in the war on terror. What’s doubly suspicious is that this is happening after all the Dems’ cut and run bills failed; the Rats are moving to plan B: ticking off our allies.

Turkey is not only of value in the WOT, but also against Russia. During the Cold War we had missiles based in Turkey pointed at the USSR as a defense after the Cuban missile crisis. And with Putin in office (with no end of term in sight, it seems), the Cold War won’t be officially over for quite a while.


15 posted on 10/13/2007 10:21:12 AM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Star Wars teaches us a foreboding lesson--evil emperors start out as Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Turkey has been giving aid right along after the initial invasion, or rather, the Turkish army has, not with troops, but with provision of space, intelligence, etc. The Army is not quite the same thing as the Government. The only reason the Army has not removed this government is the desire to join Europe. It would better for everyone concerned if Europe would finally tell Turkey NO. Then the Army would do what the Army is constitutionally directed to do, protect The Turkish Republican state.


16 posted on 10/13/2007 1:31:48 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson