Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid, Gen. Petraeus, and cooking data
Ameican Thinker ^ | September 16,2007 | Denis Keohane

Posted on 09/16/2007 7:25:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

In an interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid claimed a million Iraqis have been killed since the beginning of the invasion. How did Reid arrive at that figure? He probably got it from this poll. I know of no non-poll study suggesting anything like such a high number.

A poll! Questions were asked of a ‘representative sample' of 1,461 adults in Iraq, and from that casualty figures are determined. The pollsters actually suggest that their results indicate as many as 1,220,580 deaths since the invasion.

Among their conclusions, which they say are within plus or minus 2.4% (based purely on sampling size, not on the reliability of hearsay), they claim 20% of those have died as a result of car bombs. That is 244,000 deaths from car bombs, in four and a half years.

That's 150 people killed every single day by car bombs for 4 ½ years. I watch the news, and I don't see anything like that reported. Google news turns up a car bomb that killed ten in Baghdad three days ago. Reports will be in any moment now on the other dozen or so car bombs that went off that very same day, and the day before, and the day after...  won't they?

Just several days before General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker reported to the House and Senate, we heard Democrats go on and on about cooking data. Nancy Pelosi invoked the phrase "The plural of anecdote is not data." . Of course not! But her Senate counterpart seems to be saying poll results can yoeld casualty data.

Harry Reid was quoted by ABC News saying:
"Before the [Petreaus] report arrives in Congress, it will pass through the White House spin machine, where facts are often ignored or twisted, and intelligence is cherry-picked."
Now he seems to assert that poll results are useful as data on casualties! Not police, hospital, morgue or cemetery records! Poll results, based on what the authors of the poll deem a "representative sample."

Harry Reid deserves a new nickname: "Give ‘em hooey Harry"!


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 110th; innocentcivilians; iraq; patraeusreport; reid

1 posted on 09/16/2007 7:25:06 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In the words of Count Lantos, “I’m not buying it.”


2 posted on 09/16/2007 7:32:46 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In an interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid claimed a million Iraqis have been killed since the beginning of the invasion.

In the words of Barbara Boxer, "One must suspend disbelief."

Or was that Dianne Feinstein? No matter. They're all the same to me.

3 posted on 09/16/2007 7:35:41 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Harry Reid was quoted by ABC News saying: "Before the [Petreaus] report arrives in Congress, it will pass through the White House spin machine, where facts are often ignored or twisted, and intelligence is cherry-picked."

He knows this because that is how they did it in the Clinton administration and that is how they will do it in the Clinton administration.

4 posted on 09/16/2007 7:36:31 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, the amoral party of what if and whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06
The funny thing is Dingy Harry and Mama Boss Nancy were the ones who demanded this report in the first place!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 09/16/2007 7:43:14 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
From RedState.com:

General "Lies-and-Power".

6 posted on 09/16/2007 7:44:30 PM PDT by JoanVarga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Laura Ingraham’s sidekicks, Matt and Lee, were having a blast with that sound bite (no pun intended). When Lantos said, “I don’t buy it” it sounded as if he was saying, “I don’t bite”

They played it over and over, and she told them they were being stupid. I thought it was hilarious. He sounded just like Count Dracula, “I don’t biiite.”


7 posted on 09/16/2007 7:48:56 PM PDT by Shelayne (NO running or relenting until the problem has been dealt with-decisively,systematically,permanently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

If you torture data long enough, it will confess to whatever you wish.


8 posted on 09/16/2007 7:49:02 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It was unintentional that, in looking for RedState’s poster, I googled the names Eisenhower and Petraeus together. You don’t even wanna see what the moonbats have cooked up with that combination.

They think Petraeus wants to be the next Eisenhower.


9 posted on 09/16/2007 7:50:43 PM PDT by JoanVarga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shelayne
Laura Ingraham’s sidekicks, Matt and Lee, were having a blast with that sound bite (no pun intended). When Lantos said, “I don’t buy it” it sounded as if he was saying, “I don’t bite”

Busted. I confess I stole it from Laura Ingraham.

10 posted on 09/16/2007 7:53:23 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“In the words of Barbara Boxer”

Hillary.


11 posted on 09/16/2007 8:05:28 PM PDT by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

Thanx for the assist.


12 posted on 09/16/2007 8:07:54 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To accept what Herry Reid says about anything would require, how did she say it, “a willing suspension of disbelief?”

They have such a way with words ;-)


13 posted on 09/16/2007 9:05:20 PM PDT by DakotaRed (Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Hillary basically accused Gen Petraeus of lying in the Senate hearings when she said.......to believe his report required a “ Willful suspension of disbelief”....


14 posted on 09/17/2007 11:04:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Give ‘em hooey Harry"!

I think "Give 'em hell Harry" works too...he gives sane conservatives a hell of a time with his ridiculous statements and press releases.
15 posted on 09/17/2007 12:57:34 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (If you can't say something intelligent, don't say anything at all. Congress goes silent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson