Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does America Want a Clinton Monarchy?
RealClearPolitics ^ | September 14, 2007 | Steven Stark

Posted on 09/14/2007 8:14:34 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

There's a strange debate dominating the Democratic campaign so far. Hillary Clinton's calling card seems to be the experience that she possesses and that Barack Obama lacks. " 'Change' is just a word if you don't have the strength and experience to make it happen," she told an audience this past week, before promptly making the line the centerpiece of a new ad in New Hampshire and Iowa. "Hillary is the best-prepared to be president of any non-incumbent I have ever had a chance to vote for," the clearly biased Bill Clinton has said repeatedly on the trail this summer.

The contrast with the "inexperienced" Obama is meant to be obvious. But is it true? Mrs. Clinton has only been in the Senate for one term, not much more than Obama has. And Obama served in the state legislature before that, which Hillary never did. The only experience she has that Obama lacks is that she married a guy who was elected president and, as a result, got to live and work in the White House.

And that's the difficulty.

The idea that spouses gain qualifications through their partners' jobs is a radically new idea in this country. And no one seems to be debating it -- at least not publicly. It's not really about Hillary per se. We don't name CEO spouses the next head of the company when their partner steps down, any more than we let the wives or husbands of doctors perform brain surgery because they happen to be married to someone who does.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: aristocracy; billclinton; clintons; copresident; democrats; election2008; electionpresident; elections; elites; elitism; feminism; firstladdie; gop; hillaryclinton; media; monarchy; msm; presidentbush; privilige; republicans; royalty; scandals; twoforone; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Didn't we have a little war in the 1700's about this?
1 posted on 09/14/2007 8:14:36 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh yes.... A Monarchy of Criminals.


3 posted on 09/14/2007 8:20:48 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

We already had the Roosevelts and the Bush’s. Please no more repeats. Not good for the country.


4 posted on 09/14/2007 8:22:46 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If they are royalty, then I will invoke my Royal Irish rights to stand and sneer.


5 posted on 09/14/2007 8:24:49 AM PDT by RightWhale (Snow above 2000')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does America Want a Clinton Monarchy?

That's the question, isn't it?

6 posted on 09/14/2007 8:27:34 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aren’t we still in a Bush monarchy?


7 posted on 09/14/2007 8:36:23 AM PDT by gcruse (...now I have to feed the dog as if nothing has happened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Yes, in a country of 300 million people, there must be at least 100 million who meet the constitutional requirements to be elected President who are better qualified for the job than Hillary, and at least 297 million who are more ethical and honest.

The Roosevelts are not quite comparable since Theodore and Franklin were distant cousins. It would be more like Eleanor being elected in 1952 because she had been first lady during the FDR years.

8 posted on 09/14/2007 8:36:48 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

If you can stack the country with enough Peons, then they will accept that royalty is the way to go. Thus, the new royals open the borders and fight those who want the borders closed.


9 posted on 09/14/2007 8:37:21 AM PDT by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
We already had the Roosevelts and the Bush’s. Please no more repeats. Not good for the country.

...and Adams, Harrison, Roosevelt, and Bush


John Adams=outstanding
(son) John Quincy=mediocre

William Henry Harrison=died month after oath.
(grandson) Benjamin=so-so (ex-Yank Gen. after Civil War)

Theodore Roosevelt=outstanding
(cousin) Franklin D.=rated excellent until 3d/4th terms

Geo. H.W. Bush=poor act following Ronald Maximus
(son) Duh-pee-eeew=*&@##%

10 posted on 09/14/2007 8:39:16 AM PDT by meandog (I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
'Change' is just a word if you don't have the strength and experience to make it happen,"

If you don't break eggs, you'll never get an omlette.

11 posted on 09/14/2007 8:39:21 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Aren't we still in a Bush monarchy?

It's amazing that some people still haven't gotten the word. Bush is just a figurehead. Cheney and the neo-cons are running the country.

12 posted on 09/14/2007 8:39:41 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Hee-hawww... hee-hawwww!”


13 posted on 09/14/2007 8:39:58 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; johnny7

14 posted on 09/14/2007 8:44:50 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does America Want a Clinton Monarchy?

Heck no! Jeb Bush for President!

15 posted on 09/14/2007 8:45:41 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Take the wheel, Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; johnny7

"You may now kiss Our hand, Wretch!"

16 posted on 09/14/2007 8:46:05 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ditto!

i’ve been saying this for years.

i’m not voting for any candidate who is the son, daughter, wife of a politician.

i don’t care if it’s a pubie.


17 posted on 09/14/2007 8:48:50 AM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Bush is a -head alright, but I wasn’t thinking figure-.


18 posted on 09/14/2007 8:55:45 AM PDT by gcruse (...now I have to feed the dog as if nothing has happened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It certainly is extremely strange.

What, exactly, is hillary’s work experience?

She was only elected to the senate because she knocked Giuliani out of the race at a moment when he was screwing up his life big time. And, of course, because her name was mrs. president clinton. No carpet bagger without ANY political experience could have come into NY and won without her connection with bill clinton.

While she has been junior senator from New York, what has she accomplished? What significant bills has she sponsored, what great speeches has she given to turn the nation in a new direction? I can’t think of one.

Her two moments of fame as co-president were the failed universal health care bill and the defense of her husband’s womanizing. Great accomplishments?

The only actual work she has ever done in her life was working for a corrupt lawfirm in Little Rock; her best known achievement there was Whitewater.

Some record.


19 posted on 09/14/2007 9:11:09 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Monarchy? More like Stalinist dictatorship. And Obama Islama Ramadana In Pajamas wouldn’t be any better.


20 posted on 09/14/2007 9:19:50 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson