Declaration of war against Ron Paul

april15bendovr

[april15Bendovr]

Ron Paul refuses to declare war against Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.

We have made it clear here at Free Republic that there is irrefutable documentation showing Saddam's WMD program and links to Al Qaeda under this section on the website

PreWarDocs

Ron Paul continues to appease our enemy.

I am officially posting a declaration of war against Ron RuPaul here at Free Republic on behalf of patriotic Americans who support our troops mission in Iraq.

[jmeagan]

*****”We don’t have to resort to war every single time there’s a confrontation. They are not a threat to Israel. Israel has 200 to 300 nuclear missiles and they can take care of themselves. So you shouldn’t assume that we have to jump in and go to war, and we certainly shouldn’t do it without the consent of Congress.” - Ron Paul

Sounds like an antisemite to me.*****

Sounds like someone who knows what is going on over there. It has been an open secret, for a long time now, that Israel has nuclear weapons. The arab nations know that if push comes to shove, Israel will use its atomic weapons.

[april15Bendovr]

Jim

My gut feeling is that most Ron Paul supporters come into Free Republic just advertizing.

If they read through the different sections of collected data such as

CitizensReportonIraq

Terrorism

PreWarDocs

They would already know the documents that we stand by rather than explaining exhaustingly to them what we have learned.

Jveritas has been a true patriot and leader in translating Iraqi documents with the Docex Project.

These people have been going on what they feel rather than what they actually know. I'm tired of it.

[jmeagan]

***An enemy of the republic such as Ru is well deserving of such venom.*****

I take that as an admission that it is the RP haters putting out the venom.

****LOL! That’s why I love these Paul threads - the unintentional humor. If Pat had been the nominee, he wouldn’t have won a single state. Ron Paul can’t even get 5% in the polls and you sit there and criticize candidates who poll in the double digits. Get a clue.*****

Yeah, and no one thought he could win a primary either. I can’t remember a candidate that had more negative press from the MSM ever doing as well as Pat. In a general election, he would have pulled a lot from the Demo base.

****Ron Paul’s traitorous views on foreign policy trump any domestic policies he advocates (which aren’t all that consistent anyway).****

That is your opinion. It seems as though the regular people don’t agree with you considering his growing support among the electorate. He now has over 40,000 activist volunteers on Meetup willing to spend their own money and time to promote his candidacy.

[JTN]

9/11 Truther

Ron Paul, is not a 9/11 truther. He has repudiated them many times.

[april15Bendovr]

“I can get more information out of the new video from Bin Laden

Maybe you’ll enjoy the part where he brags about killing 3,000 Americans, got away with it, is enjoying life in Waziristan serving Allah, and urges his followers to kill even more of us soon.”

Bin Laden Quoted from Drudgereport

“You elected the Democratic Party... but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions to continue the killing and war”...

I'm sure in some sick way the Democrats, Ron Paul crowd and Al Qaeda can all agree on that statement.

[traviskicks]

LOL! Have fun in your war against him... why don’t you support your own candidate instead of tearing down one that would actually shrink the power of the federal government (what conservatism is supposed to be about)....

[traviskicks]

lol, or hung as said on another thread.. :)

[traviskicks]

“How do we weed through the adolescent commentary and get to a real discussion of ideology?”

unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be much of this sort of thing on Ron Paul threads anymore...

[JTN]

Sorry Freepers, but the old TH forum was the best forum ever on the Internet

What was the TH forum?

[JTN]

"We don't have to resort to war every single time there's a confrontation. They are not a threat to Israel. Israel has 200 to 300 nuclear missiles and they can take care of themselves. So you shouldn't assume that we have to jump in and go to war, and we certainly shouldn't do it without the consent of Congress." - Ron Paul Sounds like an antisemite to me.

Cover up tightly. There are anti-semites under your bed.

[traviskicks]

Well, I’ve always liked that frontpage statement. :)

However, as far as my understanding goes; there is only one part of that statement where Ron Paul arguably differs:

“...wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states...”

While the rest of the Republican candidates don’t meet a vast number of the listed criteria. Thompson and McCain on the 1st amendment (campaign finance), Romney and Guliani on the 2nd amendment, Guliani on abortion and immigration, Hunter on free trade, Huckbee on taxes and personal freedom (banning smoking), and of course we could go on and on.

So, the way I see it, it makes little sense to ‘declare war’ on a candidate (Paul) who is the best, IMO, in 9/10 areas... Unless the one area of contention is accorded greater weight than the others; something which isn’t clear in the front page statement and is, perhaps, what Nephi was alluding to in his post.

[383rr]

This has to be one of the most disgusting threads I’ve seen to date.

[roses of sharon]

OBL’s favorite author was just on CNN endorsing Ron Paul and Dennis Kusinich!

[april15Bendovr]

And? Whats is your point please?

Is the Ron Paul crowd disgusting or am I?

Are you with the fold the American tent crowd on fighting terrorism or are you patriotic FReeepers that want to see our troops & surge working with the support of America?

[383rr]

The contents of this thread are disgusting. Nothing but a bunch of attacks on other freepers.

Most folks I know that listen to what Paul has to say also like Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo.

I haven’t made up my mind entirely; I am looking at Tancredo, Paul and Hunter.

BTW, these kinds of threads aren’t going to win anyone over to your point of view. They just p!ss people off.

So, go ahead, and call me a “paulbearer”, or a “paulistinian”, or , hey how about something new; “Paulin”, you know, like “stalin”.

Some of us are trying to figure out what to do exactly with our votes. We want to read, and learn. It’s tough to do when all you see is this garabage.

Go ahead, now, and question my “patriotism”. I know you want to.

[april15Bendovr]

Do you think your going to get honest information from a gentleman's debate?

We have a candidate in the Republican party that would leave us vulnerable to international terrorism while simultaneously killing the honor of our troops mission in Iraq.

Sorry but that is more disgusting than worrying about what you think.

[ejonesie22]

Perhaps but I doubt it..

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

Ron Paul is just another Lyndon Larouch.

No not at all, here are the differences:

• Lyndon LaRouche never finished college.
• Ron Paul is an MD, (ob/gyn)
• Lyndon LaRouche is a convicted felon.
• Ron Paul has never committed a crime.
• Lyndon LaRouche has never held public office.
• Ron Paul has served twice in the US House of Representatives, from two separate districts in Texas.
• Lyndon LaRouche is a Trotskyite posing as a 'conservative' Democrat.
• Ron Paul is a Libertarian-leaning Republican. The two are about as far apart politically as it is possible for two people to be.
• Lyndon LaRouche believes that all evil in the world can be traced to the British Royal Family, and that those royals are the largest drug dealers in the world.
• Ron Paul could care less whether or not the British Royal Family is involved in the drug trade.

You really need to do your homework before making stupid statements.

The only things that they appear to have in common is that both have served in the US military.

[ATOMIC_PUNK]

(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)

LMAO