How can we take the war on terror seriously when they let an invasion go un-checked?
Posted on 09/04/2007 5:01:27 AM PDT by theothercheek
Mexico’s president Felipe Calderón used the occasion of his first state-of-the nation address to declare war on the United States (AKA Azatlan), proclaiming that, "Mexico does not end at its borders," and "[w]here there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."
El gato is out of the bag. The 400,000 illegal aliens who cross our southern border with Mexico each year – now 12 million strong - are not here to "do the jobs that Americans won’t do." They are an invading force waging Mexico’s protracted campaign to achieve "La Reconquista."
Calderón’s ambitions are being aided and abetted by a Fifth Column in this county that includes the ACLU, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – which have all joined forces to thwart all efforts to protect communities nationwide from being overrun - and even President George W. Bush, who has been stealthily laying plans for a European Union-style North American Union, with Calderón and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
What? You say you’ve never heard of the North American Union (NAU)? That’s because the negotiations between the U.S., Canada and Mexico have thus far been conducted in secret – without oversight by our elected representatives in Congress. Writing in Human Events, Jerome R. Corsi (co-author, with John O'Neill, of "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry") has been doggedly covering NAU-related developments for more than a year:
The Bush Administration is pushing to create a North American Union out of the work on-going in the Department of Commerce under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in the NAFTA office headed by Geri Word. A key part of the plan is to expand the NAFTA tribunals into a North American Union court system that would have supremacy over all U.S. law, even over the U.S. Supreme Court, in any matter related to the trilateral political and economic integration of the United States, Canada and Mexico. …
The executive branch under the Bush Administration is quietly putting in place a behind-the-scenes trilateral regulatory scheme, evidently without any direct congressional input, that should provide the rules by which any NAFTA or NAU court would examine when adjudicating NAU trade disputes. …
We wonder if the Bush Administration intends to present the Trilateral Regulatory Cooperative Framework now being constructed … to Congress for review in 2007, or will the administration simply continue along the path of knitting together the new NAU regional governmental structure behind closed doors by executive fiat?
Human Events details what Bush sees as the natural evolution of NAFTA – and how U.S. sovereignty could be affected:
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed. …
His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do.
According to Corsi, incremental movement towards creation of the NAU by 2010 is occurring through a series of regulatory actions by the U.S. Department of Commerce - like allowing hundreds of Mexican trucks to ply our roadways nationwide, despite the 411-3 House vote in May against entry of these trucks on safety concerns.
Unless Congress stops its partisan bickering long enough to start paying attention to what’s going on under their very noses, in three years our dinero is going to be called the Amero - and we won’t need to build a border fence, because we will no longer have borders. Then, Mexico will have achieved La Reconquista without firing a shot.
Note: The Stiletto writes about politics and other stuff at The Stiletto Blog.
bump for later
-bflr-
This is why Duncan Hunter MUST be the Republican choice for 2008.
Uh, Mr. President? Is Iraq simply a diversionary tactic to you?
bump to follow
How can we take the war on terror seriously when they let an invasion go un-checked?
Just let an “illegal” try to enter Mexico over its southern border. All hell breaks loose. Mexico will not tolerate illegal entry into its country.
This is infuriating. Let Mexico clean up its own act so its people won’t feel the need to escape from that hell hole!
I am starting to wonder ...
“This is why Duncan Hunter MUST be the Republican choice for 2008.”
I agree. Unfortunately IMO we are going to find ourselves in the same situation we had prior to the ‘06 elections. There are many here who still stand by Bush’s policy on illegal immigration/amnesty and border security. THEY will NOT be supporting Duncan Hunter and the party will remain deeply divided on the issue.
That’s just it - Bush doesn’t realize that the erosion of support for continuing the Iraq war is linked to his failure to secure our borders. Either we are protecting the homeland or we’re not. I hate to say it but all those crazy Kos people may be right - maybe we’re in Iraq for some other reason than what we’ve been told. Yes, a diversionary tactic to take everyone’s attention off this North American Union. Or am I getting paranoid?
I heard about this.
This is un-friggin-believable.
Not only do we need to worry about this and illegal issues, but part of this is a communist agenda. Do we want to be overtaken by terrorists and communists?
It gives me shivers thinking how Americans are sitting back on the laurels letting this happen.
Our elected officials better open their eyes before it’s too late.
I think we may be better off expatriating.
bttt for Duncan Hunter
Mexico can not claim the high ground as long as they do what thet do in the south.
This is infuriating. Let Mexico clean up its own act so its people won’t feel the need to escape from that hell hole!
If the Mexican power structure spent half as much effort in helping Mexicans instead of trying to win cheap points by attacking the Yankee, both countries would be better off,
I wish I knew how to do stuff like this! This made my day - though I still am scared and despressed over this North American Union thing.
You must be..... hey wait a minute!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.