Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Permanent Republican Majority? Think Again (Barf alert!)
Washington Post ^ | 8/19/07 | Andrew Kohut and Carroll Doherty

Posted on 08/19/2007 9:18:12 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist

Karl Rove dreamed of creating a "permanent Republican majority." But as President Bush's longtime adviser exits the Washington scene, the political landscape he helped chart is already shifting beneath his feet: The era of conservative values -- a tight-fisted approach toward government aid to the poor, traditional positions on social issues and a belief in a muscular foreign policy -- that emerged in the 1990s is coming to a close.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservativewaning; democrats; leftistgarbage; mediabias; republicanmajority; republicans
Rove bashing, Bush bashing, Republican bashing, and conservative bashing, all rolled into one grand enterprise. From a liberal's standpoint, what could possibly be more joyous?

Note that the authors do not compare the prevailing sentiments today with those of ten, twenty, or thirty years ago--neutral numbers that would give some reasonable perspective--but with numbers from 2002, 2003, or even 1994 (the high-water mark of American conservatism--so far, anyway) in order to make a point. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of statistics knows that this is not the proper way to examine suspected trends.

As for the comment that only "49 percent [of Americans] think that military strength is the best way to ensure peace," it is doubtful that the entire remainder of 51 percent think otherwise. There are almost certainly enough people in the "Don't Know" category to ensure that the 49 percent still represents a plurality of Americans on this issue--just don't expect that the authors of this highly tendentious piece will point that out.

1 posted on 08/19/2007 9:18:13 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
"a tight-fisted approach toward government aid to the poor" Obviously they are referring to a redistribution of wealth from those that earned it to those who didn't. Tight fisted or prevention of theft through government?
2 posted on 08/19/2007 9:23:20 AM PDT by Mumbles (Because we disagree doesn't make you or me right. Treat each other with respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
a tight-fisted approach toward government aid to the poor,

Could someone show me where jorge hasn't been spending like there was no tomorrow for years. Are better yet show me a spending bill he vetoed.

3 posted on 08/19/2007 9:26:05 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist

The only thing that is permanent is “We the people”....as long as we enforce that idea. But....I guess some of our Congressmen/women could be considered permanent also. Like Kennedy. We need term limits to get these people out of office.


4 posted on 08/19/2007 9:28:14 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Left out the fact that he wants to put 30 million illegals on public hand outs and then bring in all their families. Tight fisted on aide to the poor, bullshit, only if you were actually born in this country of American citizens, then you need to pay your own bills.
5 posted on 08/19/2007 9:29:45 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
The era of conservative values -- a tight-fisted approach toward government aid to the poor, traditional positions on social issues and a belief in a muscular foreign policy -- that emerged in the 1990s is coming to a close.,p> Don't they say this everytime they are ahead in a poll? I have never seen a MSM story about the death of liberalism. Hundreds of stories though on how the conservative movement is dying.
6 posted on 08/19/2007 9:30:57 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
The only thing Rove created permanently was a ‘war time President’.
7 posted on 08/19/2007 9:31:56 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I have never seen a MSM story about the death of liberalism. Hundreds of stories though on how the conservative movement is dying.

We conservatives are the living death...

8 posted on 08/19/2007 9:35:07 AM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RC2

As long as the Liberal progressives are promising everything to the do nothings with no strings attached just a vote for their favorite compassionate candidate, WE THE PEOPLE, HAVE TO WAKE UP, AND THROW THESE BUMS OUT OF OFFICE! Keep your eyes and ears open, when we sleep the rats are at play!


9 posted on 08/19/2007 9:38:55 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (I'd rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist

Permanent Republican Majority?

could have happened except too many republicans (holier than thou) sat out the last election and gave the lib/dems both houses of congress!!!!

in the 2008 election...although some might not be in accord with Rudy/Mitt/Fred, etc....standing on principle and not voting will let the the bee-atch...the piaps waltz into the white house!!!!!


10 posted on 08/19/2007 9:40:41 AM PDT by nyyankeefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Could someone show me where jorge hasn't been spending like there was no tomorrow for years. Are better yet show me a spending bill he vetoed.

I cannot disagree with the observation that George Bush has been a big-government conservative (if that is not a hopeless oxymoron)--in large measure, I suspect, to try to increase the GOP's client groups. (Of course, turning the GOP into a sort of Democrat-lite party is not likely to be a winning strategy, since those who prefer the policy of redistributionism will always fare better with the Democrats.)

11 posted on 08/19/2007 9:41:36 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist

And if you’re right Mr. Kohut and Mr. Doherty—what will you have then? Will you have a 50% (or higher) tax rate, a more confused judiciary, more criminals around the block waiting for you, a mess of a society as we bend for every element? Yes, masters in the media, you will, and you won’t like it very much.
Only after such desturction will you come to realize something different about politics but it will be too late. Once its in, its almost impossible to get out. You’ll be caught with the rest of us in a new kind of quagmire—within the country—the once free United States—all because you didn’t think during the years you wrote tripe like this.
Dummies.
Ignorance on free reign—our media. Stupidity on assignment—our media.


12 posted on 08/19/2007 9:49:50 AM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron; ISBN 1-4137-5397-3.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
The rumors of the demise of conservatives are greatly exaggerated.

From a liberal's standpoint, what could possibly be more joyous?

The coronation of Empress Hillary I of the United Socialist States of America?

13 posted on 08/19/2007 9:50:42 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

You bring up a good point.....however, our politicians are the ones that put the spending bills in front of the President. The President may not have vetoed the bills, but it was Congress that wanted to spend the money. We need to change Congress so these bills don’t get to the Presidents desk.


14 posted on 08/19/2007 9:54:23 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nyyankeefan
“could have happened except too many republicans (holier than thou) sat out the last election and gave the lib/dems both houses of congress!!!!”

Have you ever seen any studies that present any evidence this actually happened? As opposed to us losing the swing vote because of Iraq and corruption? Of course you dont.

15 posted on 08/19/2007 10:54:40 AM PDT by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mthom

Have the authors seen the federal budget in the last ? yrs. It shows federal spending on “social programs” is 5X that of nat’l defense.


16 posted on 08/19/2007 11:21:49 AM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist

http://tinyurl.com/2v6og7


17 posted on 08/19/2007 11:57:51 AM PDT by detch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanExceptionalist
In the run up to the last election the Washington Post demonstrated in the most convincing way that they've become the newspaper of record for their friends in the antisemitic fascist wing of the Democrat party.

They pray for a permanent majority ~ and ultimately they'll be sending people to the death camps.

Anything a "postie" says should be heavily discounted if you value your life and your children's future.

18 posted on 08/19/2007 2:43:22 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson