The Cult of the Amateur

The Titanics of world media crashed, full speed ahead, into these new media options years ago. These people STILL don't realize that half of the world population that will ever buy cell phones already have done so; nor are their realizations of the world view in touch with the effects of such a change from one-way media to two-way media, but are still in shock that the Internet provided media coverage to bloggers that toppled "The Great and Powerful Oz" in the form of Dan Rather, while their news reports tried and failed, to make a fake story about toppling the statue of Saddam Hussein.

The fact that "The Emperor Has No Clothes" is becoming obvious for half the world population directly via their cell phones, they can see it for themselves, and can no longer be fooled quite so easily as the United States Congress was fooled by the faked "Tonkin Gulf Incident" that led to "The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" that created The Viet Nam War" in a true homage to "You supply the pictures and I'll provide the war" of the height of Yellow Journalism.

If you've been paying attention to the professional media pundits, then you've probably heard at least some of their complaining from their professional pulpits that their monopolies on information in the new world of communication are waning, and that this informing of the public is increasingly being done more on the order of that "of the people, by the people, for the people," that was the ideal of the founding fathers of modern democracy.

According to the professionally paid punditry, they have done what anyone would have, could have, and should have done in the face of their admittedly "situational ethics" of their various times, but, in face of all that, I just wonder if perhaps these pundits should not have had more to say about many issues if not for bosses up an already crowded ladder of mostly prevention of stories going out.

Just ask anyone on the political beat at any media level, and they will likely tell, off the record, and some even on the record, the number of important investigative journalism results that actually get refused for publication are DOUBLE the number they published.

Twice as many political revelations get withheld as published. Mr. Jack Anderson, perhaps the most powerful political reporter of the last century, says his work output was only 1/3 what it should be, mostly as a result of political and professional pressures, put on him in no uncertain terms, that such-and-so political figures were NOT to be discussed in light of what he had uncovered.

The Encyclopedia Britannica is often cited as an example of a best result of the professional system, usually in contradistinction to the amateur efforts of Wikipedia.

However, Britannica's spectacular failures to report on Einstein's 1905 writings that fundamentally changed our understanding of this entire universe, along with their simultaneous refusal to change a centuries old attitude towards racism, the roots of World War One, just to name a few instances of brittle Britannica bias, should be enough reason alone to encourage other sources of information.

Marvin Minsky, arguably, "The smartest man in the world," at least by the standards of Isaac Asimov, says that, "You don't understand anything until you learn it more than one way."

How can you learn anything more than one way if the professionals' attention span is that of a myopic gnat?

Paid professional pundits predict the future based on the past and they make this mistake time and time and time again simply because they know it is the safe thing to do.

He was on the front page of newspapers around the world for years, so what was the idea of not putting him in the Britannica?

Well, the truth may just be that the venerable Britannica was just too invested in the world of Isaac Newton.

Then again there are the questions of Darwin, evolution. Piltdown, and a host of other political pressures on pundits at Britannica's desks, and others, including "The Monkey Trial" which was do blown out of proportion that most people forgot that Clarence Darrow was NOT the winner in that spectacular court case, to which thousands, even millions, of people paid more attention than we to Watergate.

Speaking of Watergate, do we have to be reminded that Bob Woodward was the lowliest of nobodies at The Washington Post, and how lucky we are [or unlucky, to those millions who would still prefer Nixon to have been re-elected for a third and fourth term, the law about such re-elections not withstanding]. . .how lucky we were that the story, like so many others in Washington Post history was not just killed outright by professional edict from above.

The first thing you have to realize about the professional pundits is that they are not independent.

They start their jobs the same as all of us with layer after layer of bosses, bosses' bosses, middle management, top management and a whole layer of executive suites and owners above all that, meaning that every one of the layers must agree to get a story published.

Every One of the Layers Above Must Agree to Get a Story Published! How much can actually get done when every one above you has to say "Yes" to every story you do, either implicitly or explicitly?

How much can actually get done when every one above you CAN SAY NO and kill your story.

Let's just say you are such a good reporter than 90% of your ideas get the green light from your boss, and 90% of his recommendations get the green light from the next boss, in line, and so on.

90% of your stories get approved by your #1 chain of command boss 81% of your stories get approved by your #2 chain of command boss 73% of your stories get approved by your #3 chain of command boss 66% of your stories get approved by your #4 chain of command boss 59% of your stories get approved by your #5 chain of command boss 53% of your stories get approved by your #6 chain of command boss

48% of your stories get approved by your #7 chain of command boss 43% of your stories get approved by your #8 chain of command boss 38% of your stories get approved by your #9 chain of command boss 35% of your stories get approved by your #10 chain of command boss 31% of your stories get approved by your #11 chain of command boss 28% of your stories get approved by your #12 chain of command boss

Obviously the bigger the media giant you work for [and doesn't the majority still want to work for the Big Boys], the higher the odds are that there will be more levels of bosses you must appease.

That would mean that just about half of the stories written by the reporters that have a 90% batting average, and whose bosses have a 90% batting average, etc. actually ever get published in your local media.

Obviously the higher up the food chain, the more likely your story is to be eaten by a higher level predator.

So, if you get your news from CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, BBC, CBC, etc. the odds are that you rarely, if ever, hear much of anything on an order of competition. They all answer to the same kind of plain and obvious system. They usually give the same sound bytes more or less. More and more, even in the case of the BBC who used to be the flagship for saying what the others would not, could not or should not say.

However, since the BBC got into the money business with a reversal of cash flow that would have made "Scrooge McDuck" quite proud, it has limited itself to the more mundane in the world of news as has PBS when it also repositioned itself as a commercial network, and, I should add that, technicalities notwithstanding, it should be an awful lot more than obvious that both the BBC and PBS headed in an awful lot more of a commercial direction in the Bush II Era.

The end result, as with all new media technologies, is first a new wave of publication. "The Powers-That-Be" just cannot move fast enough, really don't WANT to pay attention to "New Wave" stuff and the result is that they are like "The Titanic" for the first years of any new trend, running "full speed ahead" in a direction that's no longer the direction they really want to go.

It's not as if there is a "vacuum" in the "New Wave" of publishing via the Internet, Podcasting, cell phones, etc. The rest of the world is just ignoring "The Olde Boye Networke" and moving on from a world that just barely exists for them any longer, the world for which "The Olde Boye Networke" is boss. Level after lever as we saw above. To a world in which they can get a true first-person report from a variety of someones who do not have to say a pledge-of-allegiance to their megacorporate kieretsus before work each of their workdays until that dreaded day when they are "downsized" to a new location 6 feet under the ground on which they walked a walk precribed by their bosses, never the walks proscribed by bosses of bosses of bosses."

Perhaps, if we, the people, are lucky, these people will write the record of all they were forbidden to write. In their last days, and we will finally have, albeit on their death beds. Reporting from their own perspective rather than that of Big Brother.

Michael S. Hart [http://hart.pglaf.org], inventor of eBooks, founder of Project Gutenberg, a cofounder of The World eBook Fair [http://www.worldebookfair.com], is credited with the cofounding of the Open Source movement as well as being a pioneer by example of how the Internet should be. He may be reached at hart@pglaf.org

So, Bob Woodward could've leaked his story to Drudge Report today, and Drudge would've forced them to publish it after 7 bosses 'spiked' it.

Leaks work both ways.

But for every smalltown reporter that's fired, called a 'victory' against the MSM, it's actually a victory for AP/Al-Reuters since the paper's editors will outsource more stories, from an anonymous, leftist, American-hating writer at the news wires, and it will be identical to the story in Atlanta, Oklahoma City and Minneapolis and Riyadh.

Funny how people are upset about outsourcing offshore, and yet conservatives "cheer" when the First Amendment is outsourced.

The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech for all--for everyone; it does not guarantee employment for journalists,

Read it again, you missed a clause! "The Press" is the only private industry explicitly protected in the Constitution.

I'd agree with you, though, that nobody is guaranteed a job of any sort.

But why is it that conservatives who decry outsourcing manufacturing jobs to China cheer when investigative reporting jobs are outsourced to AP and Reuters?

"The Press" is the only private industry explicitly protected in the Constitution.
The industry is not protected any more than any other industry. Property is protected (all industry). And speech is protected (all industry, all activity, but especially the press whose business is speech). I'd agree with you, though, that nobody is guaranteed a job of any sort.

But why is it that conservatives who decry outsourcing manufacturing jobs to China cheer when investigative reporting jobs are outsourced to AP and Reuters?
First, because the Press in our generation has seldom been our friend. Second, because the result has been better news coverage. Third, because we are comparing apples and oranges. Those who argue for protectionism--and I am not one of them--I favour free tradee--generally argue for the protection of only certain kinds of jobs, e.g. manufacturing jobs. Whether journalists can find jobs or not concerns them not in the least.

Sir: To answer your question it’s a problem that is fairly simple to answer. But extremely difficult to fix. lets together attempt to answer it first then lets fix it.
The answer is that most conservatives think that msm drives the evil liberals. Hence they cheer when it looses a tentacle. The problem is we have been lulled into a world of all is good.Meanwhile the "wizard of oz" has been busy sidestepping the disaster and looking for a way to continuously win at any cost. They figure out who is the brains behind each and every Republican Leader who looks like he/she is semi-smart. Then the attack dogs go after them. IE Scooter at Dick Cheneys house. Newt in the House etc etc etc. So we need to destroy there front faces. Hillary will self-destruct thats a no brainer. Just keep her record in everyones face . We Americans tend to forget the nasty things our elected fools do. Thats how they stay in office. Now for the cure. It's called Home Schooling, the existing system is a total wash out period. private schooling is the only answer. Husbands clue in your wives stop being a know it all. Share your knowledge, share your views. Join a organization and participate like your life depends on it. Cause our kids lives do. Look at the-mess both parties are in. Lets try something radical in government. Lets put some Mommy's in office. We have dominated the offices to the point of stupidity. Katherine Harris hands down has more knowledge of whats right and wrong than both jerks from Florida. Both Nelson and Martinez are products of the damn machines that got us into this mess. We are Americans we are a product of the greatest, grandest experiment in the history of mankind. It's time to step out into a more grander huger experiment. Did Maggie Thatcher do well running the UK? Hell yes! Maybe we ought to step out of the box big time. Perhaps we should look around and then push like hell to get someone like a non full time professional politician into our offices. Number 1 change the rules on Senators and make them a 3 year term of office. Make all of there salary increases passed/failed on by The Supreme Court. That stops the KK boys from taxachusetts. Next rule change all Senators to have a maximum of 4 tours in office then they are out. That prevents The Arlen Spectors and the jerks like Leaky Leahy. That should just about finish except for one last thing lets have major Tort Changes on Lawsuits making lawyer's able to collect only if they win. All trials to be by Jury of 6 people 3 male 3 female. At the city and county level no one can run for office who has not held at least a single office that they were elected to such as a Condo Board a HOA etc. Thats my ideas,I know they are radical but at least look and think prior to shooting down the entire concept. Next item back your picks. Nobody's perfect. If they don't do what you want email them to death. That scares the shitz out of the Beltway Crowd. IE the immegration bill scared them. Remember they depend on us being to busy to care.Time to take our country back!!!!!!!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.