Posted on 06/28/2007 4:42:34 PM PDT by Kitten Festival
Leadership: Rudy Giuliani makes it clear that if he and Hillary Clinton are the nominees in 2008, she will have to answer why co-president Bill didn't treat the 1993 WTC bombing as al-Qaida's Pearl Harbor.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
So, Rudy is right on this, doesn’t change the fact that Rudy is a hopeless butthole! Rudy is in no position to criticize anyone!
She would not even let herself get near a question about that issue. She would not show up for the debate, unless her handlers were assured she would not get the question. The Clinton reality is nothing like ours....terminal narcissism.
They havent answered yet ,why would they now.
As much as I think Hillary Presidency is about the worst thing that can happen to this country, laying at her feet, the feeble inaction of her POTUS husband is a bit disingenuous.
Bottom line, it is the POTUS job, the country elected Bubba, not Hillary to defend the country.
It's a fair question to ask her what she would have done differently, if she had the oval office officially.
Rooty is grasping at straws
I thought they were co-potus? ;-)
This IMHO, is the real legacy of the Clinton administration. However, Hillary will not have to answer for it. That is dreaming Rudy.
That was the bill of goods pushed for consumption for the soccer moms
Bottom line is the First Lady has no power to do anything except force her spouse thought persuasion or blackmail to her will.
Bill is FULLY responsible for 9/11
Maybe, but I appreciate anyone bringing up the Clintons' fault in this matter...even if it's Rudy.
His statement that Clinton erred tremendously in making the first bombing a criminal matter rather than an act of war is spot on.
Doesn't hurt for him to say it. I'd be willing to hear it again and again.
Did you happen to notice the smiley face?
I agree with you, just having a little fun.
Does he suggest any particular country we should have invaded then? Rudy is all tough talk, but the terrorism problem is best handled by FBI, CIA, etc. That is what should have happened in 1993. It failed, in part due to the Clinton admin keeping the CIA and FBI from sharing info and from that administration’s general lack of interest in anything other than having a good time in the oval office.
I do think it odd for a person to care about the lives of only those Americans who have made it safely out of the womb.
I wasn't upset or mad, just pointing out the lameness of blaming Hillary for her POS husband feckless bahavior
Read post 9. Got all these people who have been part of the problem, for all these years, and, all of sudden, they are the solution? I don’t think so!
My bad …
Love that phrase!
Understand, and agree 100%.
Sure he does. It’s called the First Amendment. The DNC (Dean aNd Company) hates it.
She might have been 10%, 50% or 120% involved in the decisions of the President. She might have held a gun to his head, put a bomb under his oval office seat or blackmailed him. Doesn’t matter, he was President and was totally responsible. Just like the captain of a ship is totally responsible for everything that happens on his ship.
Addendum:
Not supporting her in anyway … just making a point.
You are right. What we had during “their presidency” was an irresponsible person who should never have been given the trust. Has BJ Blythe ever admitted responsibility for anything?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.