Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Speaker Pelosi should, of course, be rebuked for offending a bedrock separation-of-powers principle. But for the administration, the politics of her trip couldn’t be better. The Syrian regime is in the midst of executing a murderous coup to keep its hooks in Lebanon while abetting the terrorists who kill Americans and Israelis. The Speaker’s ham-handed diplomatic foray is proof positive of the folly of negotiating with such thugs. In addition, as Pelosi spoke preposterously of the Assad regime’s openness to peace, and had to be corrected on the international stage after misrepresenting Israel’s position, she confirmed the perception of many Americans that the Left is not up to the task of safeguarding our national security. -Andrew C. McCarthy

Excellent piece.

1 posted on 04/09/2007 7:13:59 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: NutCrackerBoy

So: she breaks the law buit we give her a pass because, well, we’re Republicans and we’re NICE, and we want people to like us, and....

BULLSHIT!


2 posted on 04/09/2007 7:27:28 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
Good read. I saw this at the American Spectator:

Pardon Pelosi!

3 posted on 04/09/2007 7:28:05 PM PDT by smoothsailing ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction"--President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

She needs to be removed from office.


4 posted on 04/09/2007 7:29:22 PM PDT by airborne (Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
She went there to tell the IslamoNazis to wait a few more years until the US has another Democrat President, then they could continue negotiations.
6 posted on 04/09/2007 7:31:35 PM PDT by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

I am a big fan of Andrew McCarthy..and as “right” as he may be on this...

Why is is that Prs. Bush has to “let the people decide”...and go high-minded and not go after Pelosi legally??

All the Libs/Dems/MSM have tried to do for 6 years is find some legal and not so legal loophole to get Bush out of the White House...now, you have not one, but several US Representatives breaking the LAW...

Not jay-walking...or not paying the income tax...they are messing with foreign policy during the time of WAR..

and Andrew McCarthy wants Bush to use it as an “example”????

PUH-Leeeeeeeeze

It sure as heck won’t stop the DEMS from trying to impeach Bush..and and find Rove and Gonzo and Cheney guilty of anything it takes to get them out of the Bush Admin.

just damn


7 posted on 04/09/2007 7:31:38 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Dorky Gigglelips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

I agree with McCarthy. If she is criminally investigated, indicted, and charged with a violation of the Logan Act, she will play the strings of victimization to the fullest degree. Why she would conjer up the vison of herself becoming a moder day Joan of Arc. We all know that would be laughable, but the driveby media would certainly aid her in the spin, and give Pelosi all the smoke screen she would need to obsure the debate about her behavior. Instead, use her blunders to hammer home the whole confirmed political theory that the Dimocrats can NOT be allowed to have access to the executive powers of the Presidency. We can correctly point out that utter failures of the Clinton years and the obvious failure of the Dimocrats to have learned even one thing from the fiasco of the Clintons.

Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Gore, Durbin, Kennedy, and all the other Dims that hold high esteem within the Dimocratic Party are NOT strengths to ensure their success. If we can take the debate TO them and hammer them with their own ineptitude we can clearly use the Dimocratic leadership as a massive wrecking ball to demolish the 2008 hopes of their party. President Bush is the leader of the Republican Party and MUST set a “new tone” that clearly shines a clear and brilliant light on the failure that WILL come with Dimocratic leadership. If he is unwilling on unable to do so, then the conservative leadership of the Republican Party MUST break free of their party loyalty and engage their own political version of “shock and awe” to defeat the possibility of the Dims ruining our great naiton.


8 posted on 04/09/2007 7:32:14 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; Bahbah; Mo1; Howlin; STARWISE; onyx; BigSkyFreeper

PING


9 posted on 04/09/2007 7:32:21 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Dorky Gigglelips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
"Speaker Pelosi should, of course, be rebuked for offending a bedrock separation-of-powers principle."

Number one, how does he suggest we "rebuke" her - say 'bad girl, no-no, now promise not to do it again or we'll say 'bad girl, no-no' again'?

Number two, why not do both - make her into an example of how not to be a House Speaker, and prosecute her for violation of the Logan Act, among other things?

10 posted on 04/09/2007 7:32:35 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
But is this really a law-enforcement issue? Federal statutory and regulatory books now burst into the thousands upon thousands of pages. Must the fact that a statute is inevitably implicated always mean we should delegate our political and national security issues — our policy disputes — to the federal courts for resolution?

In a perfect world, no. But in the real world, the Democrats are going to keep doing this to the Republicans until the Republicans make the Democrats taste their own blood.

Reagan had it right: Peace through strength. Here, the Dems will perceive the aggressive pursuit of criminal charges as strength, and the course of action recommended by the author as weakness--which will only incite the Democrats further.

11 posted on 04/09/2007 7:34:02 PM PDT by TheConservator (Confutatis maledictis flammis acribus addictis. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
But is this really a law-enforcement issue?

Once she broke the law, it became one.

Open a file, please.

13 posted on 04/09/2007 7:34:25 PM PDT by RichInOC (Stupidity is its own punishment...but sometimes it causes collateral damage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

bttt


16 posted on 04/09/2007 7:40:59 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Dennis Miller said it best “Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

All of this is stupid noise that will go NO WHERE.

I’d love to see Pelosi get her deserved judgement under Logan. She won’t. Stop Fantasizing that she will.

Bush could have cut her off at the pass had he not been asleep at the wheel. He could have simply held a 5 minute press conference and said the following “Speaker Pelosi may have some issues worthy of dealing with with the USA, but she isn’t speaking for the US or Isreal at this time. No state should consider her words as those of the United States Government.


17 posted on 04/09/2007 7:41:54 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy; Bahbah; Phsstpok
Nope. Pelosi and Hoyer staged an attempted coup d'etat on the world stage, and this should be dealt with as such.

I'm no engaging in hyperbole, either.


18 posted on 04/09/2007 7:44:32 PM PDT by rdb3 (SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0 (Get well Snowman!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

But, Bush is a Republician, and she is a Democrat, Therefore she has the BALLS, And he doesn’t.

Enough said! Maybe, some time way in the future, as a nuc is lighting off, a pubbie will be able to confront at RAT, and slap him across the face, and say, “I told you so”!

I can hope, I can wish!


21 posted on 04/09/2007 7:46:35 PM PDT by aShepard (Oh little Mohammad, kouchy, kouchy, koo, Your momma is so proud,you'll be the cutest suicide bomber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

BUMP


27 posted on 04/09/2007 8:19:25 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
Speaker Pelosi should, of course, be rebuked for offending a bedrock separation-of-powers principle. But for the administration, the politics of her trip couldn't’t be better. The Syrian regime is in the midst of executing a murderous coup to keep its hooks in Lebanon while abetting the terrorists who kill Americans and Israelis. The Speaker’s ham-handed diplomatic foray is proof positive of the folly of negotiating with such thugs. In addition, as Pelosi spoke preposterously of the Assad regime’s openness to peace, and had to be corrected on the international stage after misrepresenting Israel’s position, she confirmed the perception of many Americans that the Left is not up to the task of safeguarding our national security. That she also violated the Logan Act

Hear, hear Mr. President, how about stepping down from your high horse and handle the recalcitrant Congress overstepping their boundaries of separations of powers!
Mr.President, I voted twice for your election thinking, you will do the people's will, but as it is right now, it looks like you will cater once again for the sake of general appeasement to the Democrat controlled Congress and Senate!

How disappointing, Mr. President, how disapointing, I am speechless that you can not find a backbone to stand up to the likes of Pelosi, Reid and such and put them were they belong!

How sad, indeed How sad...

28 posted on 04/09/2007 8:27:19 PM PDT by danmar (Tomorrow's life is too late. Live today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Treason is treason. Bush has completely lost control of the Justice Department and the rule of law in this country.

Without the rule of law, our country will continue to go down the tubes.

I agree, Pelosi is an awkward place to start. He should have started years ago, with the series of treasonous leaks of top secret information, for instance. Or what about the vandalization of the White House when clinton’s goons left?

The result of this is that we have one law for Democrats and another law for everyone else. Not a good situation.


31 posted on 04/09/2007 8:37:52 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Arrest her. Two felony counts. Title 18 Chapter 45 Section 953 and 954. Never happen, but it would make for riveting political theater:

As the Speakers jet is returning to the United States, the President schedules an unannounced address to the nation. Pelosi’s jet arrives in Washington D.C. to an awaiting throng of media cameras. She emerges from the boarding ramp ready to give her statement. Before she reaches the podium she is confronted by a large group of waiting federal marshals, who serve her with an arrest warrant citing her violation of the Logan Act and order her to accompany them. In front of the clicking cameras she attempts to claim congressional immunity. The marshals remind her that Congress is in adjournment and therefore she is not immune from arrest, but more importantly, under Article I, Section 6 of the United States Constitution the immunity does not extend to “Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace” and because she violated the Logan Act she has committed a felony. They then inform her that in deference to her position that she will not be placed in handcuffs, unless she resists arrest. She looks to her aides for help. The marshals politely inform them that anyone attempting to stop them in their official duties will be placed under arrest as well. No help is forthcoming for now totally befuddled Speaker. She is read her rights and she is led away, doing the prep walk in front of the world. At that moment, President Bush addresses the nation,”

“My fellow Americans, it is with a heavy and sad heart that I have come before you today to announce that the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, has been arrested by federal marshals under my orders for her violation of the Logan Act. This Act is one our nation’s oldest laws and goes to the very heart of our Constitutional system. Under our Constitution the Executive branch, not the Legislative branch, has the sole responsibility for foreign policy. The Logan Act was specifically enacted to prevent public officials and private citizens for speaking for the United States when they had no authority to do so. It was enacted so that our nation speaks with one voice to friend and foe alike.

Enacted in 1799, this act was amended by Congress in 1994. Speaker Pelosi was a member of that Congress and is well aware of the Logan Act’s provisions. Despite this Speaker Pelosi, against the advice and wishes of this Administration, chose to engage in talks with the leader of Syria and made statements and promises that she was acting as a representative of the United States. She did so in clear violation of both the Logan Act and the United States Constitution. She even went so far as to misrepresent the position of Israel, forcing the Prime Minister of that country to insist that the Speaker was not authorized to negotiate on their behalf. For too long members of Congress and the Senate have believed that they should be allowed to meet with foreign leaders and make statements and promises that go against the interests of the United States, in clear violation of the Logan Act. Under my clear Constitutional authority to enforce the laws of the United States I have decided to arrest Speaker Pelosi under Title 18 Chapter 45 Sections 953 and 954 of the US Code. I have named Patrick Fitzgerald as Special Prosecutor for this case. Speaker Pelosi will be accorded the same treatment as any United States citizen under arrest for suspicion of a felony crime and will have the right to bail so that she may resume her Congressional duties while this matter is under investigation. This arrest is to remind members of Congress and Senate that they are subject to the laws enacted by Congress, and that as President I will faithful enforce them. Thank you, and God bless.”

Of course, the Democrats would instantly start impeachment proceedings as soon as Pelosi was released on bail, but what fun we would all have


36 posted on 04/09/2007 8:56:35 PM PDT by Tarnsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

Investigate and debate. The throw her in the slammer, and destroy her publicly.


37 posted on 04/09/2007 9:04:53 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy

The democrats would sure be attacking any republican who did what she did.


38 posted on 04/09/2007 9:12:56 PM PDT by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson