PLEASE HIT THIS POLL~

Sun Sentinel ^ | March 19,2007 | Sun Sentinel

[Fawn]

Four years after President Bush launched the U.S. attack on Iraq, the fighting continues with no end in sight. Would you support a presidential candidate who backs continued U.S. military involvement?

[mainepatsfan]

Gee that's not a question designed to get a certain response is it? /s

[Fawn]

Here's the link:

SUN-SENTINEL

[Fawn]

Usually I ignore their liberal leaning polls.....but this one ticked me off.

[chesley]

Done! We're losing.


26.8%
Yes. (386 responses)

65.2%
No. (938 responses)

7.9%
I'm not sure. (114 responses)

1438 total responses

[KeyLargo]

The Flori-DUH geezers just want their free cheeze and no govt money spent anywhere but on them.

You do know that they have to survive by driving their luxury car to the store to by dog food to feed themselves don't you?

[Lady Jag]

Voted. Didn't get a result to report, but I'm in there as YES.

[dubie]

29.6%
Yes. (458 responses)

62.7%
No. (971 responses)

7.7%
I'm not sure. (119 responses)

1548 total responses

[Lucky9teen]

Here's a poll to ping...

[ncpatriot]

btt

[A message]

Four years after President Roosevelt launched the U.S. attack on Germany, Japan and Italy, the fighting continues with no end in sight. Would you support a presidential candidate who backs continued U.S. military involvement?

To all the seriously stooopid liberals who are socialists and communists I say freedom is not free.

[Fawn]

Thanks.

WE NEED 1000 MORE VOTES!!!!!!

[A message]

And God Bless our soldiers!!

[American Quilter]

FReeped it. Out of 1731 responses, 32.9% Yes (would support a presidential candidate who backs continued U.S. military involvement in Iraq); 60.4% No; 7.3% Not Sure.

[CDHart]

33 YES, 59 NO.

Carolyn

[APStyle7]

If this tells you how BS this poll is...the number of yes votes (not the %..the actual raw number) is going DOWN. Seems a bit impossible unless they are manipulating the #s. What a rag.

[Fawn]

BTT PLEASE VOTE

[trimom]

The numbers are improving, but not by much.

36.4%
Yes. (774 responses)

56.8%
No. (1207 responses)

6.8%
I'm not sure. (144 responses)

2125 total responses

[CDHart]

Actually, I think the "yes" vote has gone up since FR got ahold of the poll. It was 29% yes and when I voted it had gone to 33%.

Carolyn

[Tarantulas]

Slowly getting better...

37.1%
Yes. (846 responses)

56.3%
No. (1285 responses)

6.6%
I'm not sure. (150 responses)

2281 total responses

[Yo-Yo]

Four years after President Bush launched the U.S. attack on Iraq, the fighting continues with no end in sight. Would you support a presidential candidate who backs continued U.S. military involvement?

37.6%
Yes. (910 responses)

55.9%
No. (1354 responses)

6.6%
I'm not sure. (159 responses)

2423 total responses

[SaxxonWoods]

Done, twice.

[beeber]

I support president Bush and the war on terror! The Iraq war is a daily reminder that we were attacked on 9/11! In our 'throw away' society, people soon forget the daily events which lead us here. Never forget!

[Fawn]

:) THanks.

PLEASE VOTE

[popdonnelly]

"Would you support a presidential candidate who backs continued U.S. military involvement?"

You mean like Hillary Clinton? In Hillary's case, no.

[Joe Boucher]

From the Sun Sentinel?
You are kidding right?
It is a liberal rag like so many others.

[rbmillerjr]

freepvote

[dynachrome]

Definitely need some industrial freepin'! Thanks to lucky9teen for da ping!

34.6% Yes. (1608 responses) 59.4% No. (2755 responses) 6.0% I'm not sure. (278 responses)

FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)

[pandoraou812]

voted yes

[BykrBayb]

33.9%
Yes. (1821 responses)

60.2%
No. (3236 responses)

5.9%
I'm not sure. (316 responses)

5373 total responses

[DaveLoneRanger]

Well it's NICE that they are so OBJECTIVE about it.