Posted on 01/31/2007 12:04:28 PM PST by Tolik
Address at the National Review Institute
You can watch the video here
The following is the handout given at the speech:
As we look to the way forward as conservatives, one fact is paramount: American conservatism is about vastly more than the presidency. The history of the modern American conservative movement was written in states and communities and in citizen activism. Some of the highlights:
The history of the conservative movement offers us a clear way forward today: To renew, revitalize and relaunch the movement of Goldwater, Reagan and the Contract with America, we must concentrate our energies on all 511,000 elected offices in America, not just the presidency and Washington. We need a movement far beyond Washington. The oval office by itself is incapable of moving to a more conservative America.
Whats more, the current consultant and money dominated presidential campaign process is particularly ill-suited to moving conservatism forward. The consultant class requirement that presidential campaigns begin two years before the voting guarantees that by the time a candidate gets into office her or she is two years out of touch with reality and the American people. Promises in February 2007 cant accurately predict performance in February 2009.
In addition to focusing on more than the presidency and presidential politics, four other points are critical to the future of conservatism.
First, American conservatism at its best has historically been about shaping a future based on freedom. We should be the future oriented movement. Our responsibility is to define a better future, and not just for some Americans but for all Americans. We cannot ignore the moral challenge of those Americans who have been left out of the American dream.
Second, American conservatism at its best has always been focused on individuals, families and communities, not government. Conservatives have to relearn a core principle of politics the principle Ronald Reagan always understood that issues must be addressed in a personal context first and only later in the historical and lastly, in the political context. The first questions we must always ask ourselves are: What will we do to help the American citizen? How are our solutions relevant to your life? This is not a formula for bigger bureaucracy. It is a formula for better policies.
Third, we are on the verge of extraordinary opportunities to dramatically improve public policies. Below are the seven principles of creating American solutions to help win the future:
Fourth, American conservatism at its best has always understood that the American people have to force change on Washington. Washington will not change itself. The Washington environment is pro-government, pro-liberal, and pro-elite. The American people, on the other hand, are pro-God, pro-English, and instinctively anti-bureaucracy.
The organization we are launching, American Solutions, is a deliberate effort to renew, revitalize and relaunch the Goldwater-Reagan-Contract with America movement by going back to its source: the citizen activist, communities and states that built the American conservative movement.
The premise of American Solutions is that politics as usual focusing on what is wrong with the Left rather than what we can do for the country will not bring about change. We have to take the proven principles of conservatism Ronald Reagans banner of bold colors and translate them into bold solutions. We need to build a movement outside Washington based on these bold solutions. Then and only then will we force conservative change on Washington.
Bump for later!
BTTT
Truman's memoirs included an appreciation of the need for histororical appreciation in order to lead our great land.
Newt's a great thinker and philosopher -- a historian and intellectual. I don't think he'd make it in the general election. I'd like to see him sign up as Rudy's Karl Rove. I think they'd make a great team and a great administration.
That'll work too!
Wonder if Newt still thinks hilaryclinton is brilliant.
Well I think she's very shrewd. A shrewd shrew.
Newt can say what he likes, but I would never vote for the tubby little hall monitor.
I agree, I despise him
He is my choice too. He has some personal history/baggage that I have never seen a satisfactory explanation that he or anybody else gives (and he will be attacked on that for sure). My problem is that I can't expect ANY politician to be clean enough to be kosher. So, if I have to overlook somebodies problems anyway, I choose him.
LOL.....have you been listening to Hannity. There's Newt talking about his gal pal now!
Nope. I haven't heard Hannity in a while.
It's good that Newt takes Missus Clinton seriously. She's seriously dangerous and not to be underestimated
Guess he hasn't heard all her flip flopping statements. She makes jon carry seem absolutely decisive.
She has nothing to offer but change itself. As in changing her mind every other week.
I watched her Iowa event on CSPAN.
I'll sum up her platform as I've seen presented so far
1. I'm a woman, vote for me sisters
2. China and India are big threats - this goes straight to middleclass econmic concerns.
3. Experience. Eight years as co-president.
In short she hopes to capitalize on the woman vote, the blue collar vote, and those who warmly remember the Clinton fake economy.
Add these to the 90% of the black vote that is automatic and you are at atleast 48% of the vote.
I can't think of a single state she'll lose that Kerry won.
So ya, I agree with Newt in regards to the Clintonian threat. Wish I was listening to Hannity right now.
But at least things are consistent...Americans also now want a King, not a President. (Emperor Bush went too far, though. :-)
That's a great idea!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.