Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

E-mail to soldier spurs outrage (barf alert, sympathy piece for mat company)
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ^ | 1-22-07 | ANNYSA JOHNSON

Posted on 01/23/2007 12:39:23 AM PST by atomic conspiracy

Edited on 01/23/2007 8:09:47 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
My e-mail to the author of this piece:

"....an international incident that has pitted military supporters against free speech advocates and threatens to shut down the local company."

Do those who disagree with the company's e-mail not also have the right of free speech? No reasonable person would countenance death threats but your wording does not make this distinction. Somehow, any statement disagreeing with the anti-war e-mail is in opposition to free speech. In placing "military supporters" on one side and diametrically opposing them with "free speech advocates" your own words leave no room for any other conclusion.

Contrary to leftist dogma and the invited inference in your article, the Constitution does not grant immunity to criticism or disagreement. To pretend otherwise does not support free speech, it supports fascism.

Take a look at the "quotables" box at the link if there is any remaining doubt about the MJS's bias

1 posted on 01/23/2007 12:39:24 AM PST by atomic conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
"Vice president Sajid Nasir...."

Well, we know who works there.

2 posted on 01/23/2007 12:48:27 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
"This is a matter of free speech," said Julie Enslow, an organizer with Peace Action Wisconsin in Milwaukee. "It is totally irresponsible for radio stations and bloggers to attack a person for his personal political views."

These leftists are nuts. They attack conservatives from Pres. Bush on down for their political views every day.

3 posted on 01/23/2007 12:56:12 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

You reap what you sow. No pity here.


4 posted on 01/23/2007 12:57:54 AM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

BINGO! The same, tired old screed. Hey, the left says, you can't attack free speech, so shut up! Apparently, most of the left thinks free speech means leftist propoganda, free of criticism.


5 posted on 01/23/2007 1:00:14 AM PST by jim35 ("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
"This is a matter of free speech," said Julie Enslow, an organizer with Peace Action Wisconsin in Milwaukee. "It is totally irresponsible for radio stations and bloggers to attack a person for his personal political views."

Someone at the company made this political, and now bloggers and radio aren't supposed to comment on it? I guess that "free speech" doesn't apply to them.

6 posted on 01/23/2007 1:07:36 AM PST by SIDENET (Everybody was kung-fu fighting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim35; SIDENET

This Orwellian interpretation of free speech is the absolute essense of totalitarian activism. The idea that leftists are immune to criticism is bizarre but 40 years of media indoctrination have ensured that it reaches every nook and cranny of American society. It is the default response to criticism for all leftists, implying that their rights are somehow violated when someone disagrees with them. We heard it from the Dixie Chicks, we hear it from rank-and-file liberals on person in the street interviews. Millions are intimidated by it, because they do not know what their own rights are.


7 posted on 01/23/2007 1:12:57 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy; All
John Gibson of the 'Big Story' covered this on Fox News earlier today. At the Fox News website they have posted the story with video link here -

Web Site Kicks Sand in Faces of GIs in Iraq Asking for Mats to Ease Hardship of Sleeping on Ground

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,245718,00.html
(video link called 'Request denied' about half way down.

8 posted on 01/23/2007 1:19:21 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
"Some people will look for any excuse to target people from the Middle East," I sent them a nasty note and I didn't even know their nationality or religious leanings. Some people will play the 'oppressed muslim' card every chance they get.
9 posted on 01/23/2007 1:30:26 AM PST by Reform4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

"This is a matter of free speech," said Julie Enslow, an organizer with Peace Action Wisconsin in Milwaukee. "It is totally irresponsible for radio stations and bloggers to attack a person for his personal political views."

It always amazes me how little people understand how freedom of speech works in America - the give and take. Let's see how Alexis De Tocqueville described it back in 1835:

"In America, the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion: within these barriers, an author may write what he pleases; but woe to him if he goes beyond them."


10 posted on 01/23/2007 1:35:21 AM PST by roscommon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

up this company's River Wazoo on a rusty meathook...well fouled with salt...
A classic example of poor screening by personnel...
Better known as "Poison L"...and lack of defined SOP's...



11 posted on 01/23/2007 1:36:53 AM PST by Gunny P (Gunny P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

up this company's River Wazoo on a rusty meathook...well fouled with salt...
A classic example of poor screening by personnel...
Better known as "Poison L"...and lack of defined SOP's...



12 posted on 01/23/2007 1:36:57 AM PST by Gunny P (Gunny P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
As I like to say, "Actions have consequences". If you are going to express your "views" as a representative of a company, you have to accept the potential fallout. If you are going to insult potential customers, then you deserve to have no customers. To whine about the negative impact is the height of hypocrisy. My advice...just stick to selling mats. Leave your views to the social scene. Good luck trying to save your business.

Ah...ain't the free market great?
13 posted on 01/23/2007 1:37:46 AM PST by mesoman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunny P
Wisconsin Company Nasty To Soldier Serving in Iraq

It looks like the mat company is middle eastern owned and operated. It is no big surprise that one of the employees acted out in this way.

14 posted on 01/23/2007 1:45:25 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gunny P

Please add their hypocritical leftist allies to that. Without the support of the left and the leftist media, the Islamic terrorists would be less than nothing. Make no mistake, free speech is the left's ultimate target. That is where we get this weird idea of pretending that disagreement with the left somehow violates their rights. Two generations of Americans are so heavily indoctrinated by left-media that they don't realize they do have the right to disagree with lefties in public. Stalin made it a crime to criticize his regime, America's left is well on its way to doing the same.


15 posted on 01/23/2007 1:51:27 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

The 'left' in this country will not succeed. They'll be wiped out in a civil war if in the end that is what it takes to stop them.


16 posted on 01/23/2007 2:15:25 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Oh. comeon now, It was John Kerry that answered that e-mail, and he was trying to make a joke. The problem is that conservatives don't understand liberal jokes. /sarc


17 posted on 01/23/2007 2:21:51 AM PST by Lokibob (Greatest snow on earth. www.utahweatherlinks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

It gives me no joy to say so, but I think that is exactly what it will take.


18 posted on 01/23/2007 2:23:47 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roscommon

Wonderful post!


19 posted on 01/23/2007 2:32:11 AM PST by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Ditto.


20 posted on 01/23/2007 2:33:58 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson