Here is his white horse:
Posted on 01/18/2007 7:47:15 AM PST by neverdem
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has told conservative activists that he will vote to strip a key provision on grassroots lobbying from the reform package he previously supported.
The provision would require grassroots organizations to report on their fundraising activities and is strongly opposed by groups such as the National Right to Life Committee, Gun Owners of America, and the American Civil Liberties Union.
While grassroots groups on both sides of the political spectrum oppose the proposal, social conservative leaders such as Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, who broadcasts a radio program to hundreds of thousands of evangelical Christians, have been its most vehement critics.
McCain sponsored legislation last Congress that included an even broader requirement for grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. But now he will vote to defeat a similar measure.
It would be politically dangerous for McCain to support disclosure because it would anger many conservative activists, including those who advocate against abortion rights or for gun ownership rights. He is courting many of them for his 2008 presidential campaign. McCain’s presidential exploratory committee announced yesterday that Maxine Sieleman, a socially conservative leader who founded the Iowa chapter of Concerned Women for America, had joined its camp.
In letters circulated on Capitol Hill this week, the National Right to Life Committee and Gun Owners of America warned senators that votes on the grassroots lobbying provision would affect legislative scorecards they tabulate for each lawmaker.
Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah) has sponsored the amendment to the lobbying reform package that would strip the provision. His amendment is expected to come to the floor for a vote today, said advocates opposing it.
Bennett said he was “a little” surprised to hear that McCain would support him but was “delighted.” McCain is considered one of the most authoritative voices on ethics- and lobbying-related issues in the Senate.
“It’s a very high priority,” said Douglas Johnson, director of legislative affairs for the National Right to Life Committee. Johnson said ordinary grassroots activists from Arizona who had called McCain’s office were told by aides that he would support Bennett’s amendment.
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the conservative American Center for Law and Justice, told The Hill that he had received confirmation from McCain’s staff yesterday that he would oppose the disclosure proposal.
“It’s huge,” Sekulow said of the issue’s importance. “It’s the most significant restriction on grassroots activity in recent history. I’d put it up there with the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.”
McCain was the chief sponsor of the landmark 2002 campaign finance bill, a history that still angers many conservatives. They cite McCain’s sponsorship of that legislation as something that makes them wary about supporting his presidential bid. But McCain’s recent action could redefine him.
“He’ll do everything he can to appeal to conservatives he has already tried to silence,” said John Velleco, director of federal affairs at Gun Owners of America, referring to McCain’s support of campaign finance reform. “I think he’s trying to gain the support of conservatives as much as he can.”
“Romney’s doing the same thing,” Velleco added, explaining that McCain’s rival for the nomination, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, is re-evaluating his past positions on gun ownership rights.
While McCain has privately told conservative groups that he will side with them, he was not ready to reveal his position yesterday. He opened yesterday’s floor debate with a 15-minute speech on the lobbying reforms under consideration. While he urged his colleagues to support the creation of an office of public integrity, he made no mention of grassroots lobbying.
Immediately afterward he declined to state his position on grassroots disclosure.
“I’ll address it when it comes up,” he told The Hill.
But McCain’s spokeswoman, Eileen McMenamin, confirmed that he would support the Bennett amendment.
“Initially when Sen. McCain introduced legislation last year it had a grassroots provision,” she said. “Subsequent to that that he got a lot of feedback from groups that the requirements would be too onerous on them because of the reporting requirements.”
McMenamin added that a grassroots lobbying disclosure requirement was not included in reform legislation McCain introduced at the beginning of this month.
Johnson, of the National Right to Life Committee, said that there is confusion about which groups would be affected by the pending regulation.
“Under Section 220, anyone who is paid anything by an organization that spends any money at all to encourage more than 500 members of the general public to communicate with members of Congress, if he or she also has contacted congressional offices directly as few as two times, and has spent as little as 20 percent of his or her time on such direct lobbying and grassroots-motivating activities, would be required to register with Congress as a ‘lobbyist’ and file detailed quarterly reports,” wrote Johnson in a letter to Senate offices, adding, “If enacted, it will disrupt the constitutionally protected activities of thousands of issue-oriented citizen groups from coast to coast. …”
McCain’s past allies in battles to reform government strongly support disclosure and were surprised to discover his position had changed.
“We saw him supporting it last year,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Public Citizen.
“It surprises me and it will surprise the rest of the reform community. I was really expecting him not to get involved in that provision and I had received no indication from his office that he was leaning against it.”
I don't say this often but... Good for McCain.
He was for the provision before he was against it.
This is too funny! McCain wanted to stifle the Christian Right, but now that James Dobson is opposing him, McCain is changing his mind. What a spineless, two-faced typical politician. McCain should be rejected by anyone who has a sense of self respect.
Can you say 2008??
Of course.
it's rare that a nypolitician does anything for any reason other than an election
I'll believe it when it happens.
McCain/Kerry F the POWS/MIAS
McCain/Feingold F Free Speech
McCain/Kennedy F American Sovereignty
McCain/Keating Money theft
Enough said.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
He only does it as a matter of momentary expediency.
Once president, he'd probably require bootlicking by everyone not named McCain.
I don't trust him.
Probably.
Hmmm ... seems to be a politician without principles ... who'da thunk?
I'm glad he will oppose this, but it doesn't change my mind about him. He wants the provision, but doesn't find it politically expedient at this time.
He is also still in favor of yet another bureacracy with this ridiculous and pointless Office of Public Integrity (LOL, things are almost always the opposite of what they are named), increased cost to the taxpayer with no benefit at all.
McLame is beginning to see that Conservatives are serious about not supporting him because of his liberal views.
The illusion of grassroots politics (on the left)
Leftists in Search of Permanent Democrat Majority (IMPORTANT Read -- Soros and leftists org)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1769370/posts?page=43#43
To call McCain a whore would be an insult... to whores!!
I think you read that wrong - Dobson and McCain are on the same side. However, reading the article is very hard because its written cryptic, as if they author is trying to portray conservatives as being bad for being against this bill which crushes free speech.
Court the conservatives to win the election, then vote against them constantly while in office.
Hmmm. . . what current president does this sound like?
This provision affected all groups: left, right and center.
There appears to be unity across the political spectrum on this. Senator Ethics will lead the charge for Truth, Justice and the American Way as soon as his white horse is prepared.
"Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has told conservative activists that he will vote to strip a key provision on grassroots lobbying from the reform package he previously supported."
When McCain first supported it, Dobson turned against McCain. When McCain found the 800 pound gorilla of the Christian Right was opposing him, he changed his position. McCain is a snake.
From straight talk to shameless, who cares about what? The Constitution that he swore to uphold, or statists at Common Cause, which is the question? IMHO, he's toast & good riddance, even if he belatedly recognizes the First Amendment.
McNut just started the old Flip-Flop,Flip-Flop.No one should should vote for this nut.
Hillary?
Says who?!
I guess they forgot Keating 5. I wonder how they THINK McCain gets his campaign cash?!
But is the GOP beginning to see it? McCain has been the annointed one of the party. Perhaps the message of the people is starting to sink in. One can only hope.
McCain sees his poll numbers slipping and is trying to head off disaster by placating the base......now that he needs them.
McCain brought us Soros, Soros anti-American money, and the extreme left wing 527's (Busted numerous times for turning in thousands of bogus absentee ballots).
Sure, I'll vote for McCain - NOT!!! Maybe ACORN can print him up a few new "extra" voters.
Wait till he puts the spurs to that baby.
McCain voted FOR the provision before he voted against it....good move, Kerry Lite.
'Course he wants the provision. He sponsered the bill. This is a jackbooted step to the left of his baby CFR, but now that he knows it'll cost him VOTES, John "I Have a Mandate" McStain is flip flopping. But only with his mouth.
Good one!
> I don't say this often but... Good for McCain.
Don't go thinking warm, fuzzy thoughts just yet. McCain is campaigning like crazy for your conservative vote. If he ever gets in power, expect the "new" McCain to disappear like smoke.
This guy is not genuinely changing his mind.
"He [Michael Graham] also mentioned my abridgement of First Amendment rights, i.e. talking about campaign finance reform .. I know that money corrupts .. I would rather have a clean government than one where quote First Amendment rights are being respected, that has become corrupt. If I had my choice, I'd rather have the clean government."
According to him we have "quote" rights. The nut bag is UNFIT to be a senator dog catcher, let alone POTUS.
I'm still waiting for the cable TV rate control he was getting for us...
TOM TANCREDO for President '08
This guy McCain should pick up a copy of the Constitution AND READ IT. What a jerk.
I never said he did and I didn't say I supported him in the priamry, either.
I'm just one to praise what is good and condemn that which is bad, regardless of motivation.
Funny thing about self-interest, it brings about the best results, albeit quite often unintentionally.
Oooh, I'm sorry. You are incorrect.
The answer was: Who is President George W. Bush?
Don't get too excited -- McInsane temporarily pulled his head out of his ass to get a breath of fresh air..
He will resume his normal anal fixation.
Semper Fi
I don't think that was his motivation. McCain-Feingold was older than his presidential run. McCain doesn't like to think of himself as having flaws. Hence, his getting caught in the Keating 5 isn't a flaw on his part, it's a flaw in the system.
This was not in reference to McCain-Feingold.
From the article:
"McCain sponsored legislation last Congress that included an even broader requirement for grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors."
He was for the provision before he was against it.
McCane could be President if only he'd run as a Democrat.
I was refuting this:
McCain wanted to stifle the Christian Right
The fact that McCain wants all of these restrictions have nothing to do with some idea that he wants to repress the Christian Right. It's psychological with him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.