Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

I'm glad he will oppose this, but it doesn't change my mind about him. He wants the provision, but doesn't find it politically expedient at this time.

He is also still in favor of yet another bureacracy with this ridiculous and pointless Office of Public Integrity (LOL, things are almost always the opposite of what they are named), increased cost to the taxpayer with no benefit at all.


15 posted on 01/18/2007 8:03:40 AM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bahbah
"I'm glad he will oppose this, but it doesn't change my mind about him. He wants the provision, but doesn't find it politically expedient at this time"

'Course he wants the provision. He sponsered the bill. This is a jackbooted step to the left of his baby CFR, but now that he knows it'll cost him VOTES, John "I Have a Mandate" McStain is flip flopping. But only with his mouth.

35 posted on 01/18/2007 8:38:20 AM PST by cake_crumb (When "bipartisan study groups" prosecute wars, you get Another Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson