Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

For those that claim that the interviews are hearsay- "In the tape-recorded interview," http://www.yahoo.com/s/469817

Listen to the tape.

1 posted on 12/28/2006 9:36:05 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: ARealMothersSonForever

Words of wisdom from the guy who couldn't beat Carter.


2 posted on 12/28/2006 9:38:16 AM PST by samtheman (The Democrats are the DhimmiGods of the New Religion of PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Hmmm, butter pecan ice cream!


3 posted on 12/28/2006 9:39:13 AM PST by Dutchguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

So, ignoring the messenger, what will the opinion mean in the next 2-4 years?


4 posted on 12/28/2006 9:39:34 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Woodward proves himself to be scum once again.


5 posted on 12/28/2006 9:39:42 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Ford was considered a dunce by the left. Now he will be their hero.


6 posted on 12/28/2006 9:39:50 AM PST by grb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
The number of Ford boosters who have appeared on FR is mindboggling.

He was a terrible President who continued Nixon's ridiculous and socialist domestic policies.

He was an abortionist's dream President.

He was the epitome of the Rockefeller wing of the GOP that almost consigned the party to oblivion.

He stood for the diametric opposite of everything Ronald Reagan stood for.

It does not surprise me in the least that he badmouthed our efforts in Iraq.

Please let the ceaseless hagiography end.

9 posted on 12/28/2006 9:41:42 AM PST by wideawake (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Gerry may have been a nice guy, but he was afflicted with the same appeasement/spineless gene that has de-balled countless Americans over the last 4 decades.

It is certainly no surprise that the MSM would trot this out asap after his passing.
10 posted on 12/28/2006 9:42:01 AM PST by Pox (If it's a Coward you are searching for, you need look no further than the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
"I don't think I would have gone to war," Ford told Woodward a little more than a year after President Bush launched the invasion.

I wouldn't be surprised if Bob has a few posthumous interviews with Gerald coming up in his next book.

It wouldn't be the first time he spoke to dead people.

11 posted on 12/28/2006 9:43:07 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

I am ARealMedicfortheAF........bottom line..... WHO CARES!!


14 posted on 12/28/2006 9:44:30 AM PST by marmar (Get over it!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Nobody beats Ford in the categories of knowing what the country needed. Nobody but Grover Cleveland beats him in using the veto to stop anti-Constitutional shenanigans.

But he was largely useless on national security and foreign policy. The only reason he isn't remembered as one of the worst ever in those categories is because he was followed by the absolute worst possible President in those categories.

I would also submit that if war against Iraq was not justified--even without the WMDs--then there is no justification for war by American forces anywhere at any time.

19 posted on 12/28/2006 9:48:38 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (The people walking in darkness have seen a great light...Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Listen to the tape.

The interview conducted and edited by the completely unbiased Woodward, and only made public when Ford is dead and can't respond?

22 posted on 12/28/2006 9:49:32 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
From this link, from 1995

Transcript of Live Chat with Gerald Ford

To my knowledge, every sitting president has, whenever he thought it was necessary, called on former presidents to be helpful. President Carter, when he was in the White House, asked for my help on at least four foreign policy issues. For example, I supported him and helped to get some votes in the U.S. Senate at the time of the Panama Canal Treaty and the recognition of the People's Republic of China. I respect former President Carter's desire to help President Clinton in foreign policy, but I think it mandatory that Carter carry out the Clinton policies. Former President Carter should not in any way whatsoever undercut the foreign policies of President Clinton or his Secretary of State. Any deviation from White House foreign policy would be harmful, not helpful.

FWIW.

24 posted on 12/28/2006 9:50:01 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
But we shouldn't have put the basis on weapons of destruction.

We did not go into Iraq because we thought he had weapons of mass destruction, we went in because he had violated UN resolution after UN resolution and to enforce the 1991 Gulf War cease fire agreement. I am so sick of the MSM and other liberals re-writing history.

Saddam was blocking inspectors, he was firing on US and British aircraft trying to enforce the no-fly zone, and would not account for know weapons and weapon materials. After 9/11 the entire country (including Dave Letterman and Dan Rather) were in agreement that we could not risk another known enemy of the US to defy our sovereignty and risk our security.

28 posted on 12/28/2006 9:51:24 AM PST by txroadkill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Thomas DeFrank of the NY Daily News says differently. Ford told Bush he supported the war:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1759333/posts


29 posted on 12/28/2006 9:52:08 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Uh, I don't see any criticism by Ford against the war. The MSM is spinning it that way, but if you read closely, he is pretty much saying that there was plenty of justification for whacking Saddam besides the WMD reason.

Nor did Bush evr say that WMD was the ONLY reason for ridding Saddam.


38 posted on 12/28/2006 9:57:55 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

Related.....

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2006/12/debunking-woodward.html


41 posted on 12/28/2006 9:59:43 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Woodward wrote in the Post that his interview took place for a future book project

Oh, brother. Another Woodward book. Well, let's see, he's written one essentially saying the Iraq war was brilliantly handled, followed by one claiming it was incompetently handled. So what's left for book number three? Woodward flip-flops as bad as John Kerry, and is even more likely to attribute key claims to unidentified or unconfirmable sources.

48 posted on 12/28/2006 10:05:26 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
"Rumsfeld and Cheney and the president made a big mistake in justifying going into the war in Iraq. They put the emphasis on weapons of mass destruction," Ford said. "And now, I've never publicly said I thought they made a mistake, but I felt very strongly it was an error in how they should justify what they were going to do."

Key words bolded.

It seems to me that President Ford did not oppose the war in Iraq, as much as he opposed the reasoning behind it that was presented to the American people. It looks like his words are being twisted.

}:-)4

53 posted on 12/28/2006 10:09:38 AM PST by Moose4 ("Your attitude's the reason the triggers keep squeezin'...the hunt is on and it's open season")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
" Saddam Hussein was an evil person and there was justification to get rid of him," he observed to the Daily News. "But we shouldn't have put the basis on weapons of destruction. That was a bad mistake. Where does (Bush) get his advice?"

Whats wrong with this? I could come to agree with it myself. Ford isn't saying it was wrong to invade, but that too much emphasis was placed on the WMD. You know what? In retrospect, he might be right, and I could, as a good conservative, potentially agree.

So much knee jerking going around these days, FR needs an in house orthopedist..

55 posted on 12/28/2006 10:09:52 AM PST by Paradox (Let's really defeat Global Warming, build 100 new Nuclear Powerplants! {crickets....})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
So, Son.........now you are joining with Bob Woodward and using him as a weapon to attack our mission in Iraq.

Tell me how you sleep at night.

57 posted on 12/28/2006 10:12:17 AM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson