Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Downgrades Man's Impact On The Climate
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12-10-2006 | Richard Gray

Posted on 12/09/2006 7:19:15 PM PST by blam

UN downgrades man's impact on the climate

Richard Gray, Science Correspondent, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 1:32am GMT 10/12/2006

Mankind has had less effect on global warming than previously supposed, a United Nations report on climate change will claim next year.

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says there can be little doubt that humans are responsible for warming the planet, but the organisation has reduced its overall estimate of this effect by 25 per cent.

In a final draft of its fourth assessment report, to be published in February, the panel reports that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has accelerated in the past five years. It also predicts that temperatures will rise by up to 4.5 C during the next 100 years, bringing more frequent heat waves and storms.

The panel, however, has lowered predictions of how much sea levels will rise in comparison with its last report in 2001.

Climate change sceptics are expected to seize on the revised figures as evidence that action to combat global warming is less urgent.

Scientists insist that the lower estimates for sea levels and the human impact on global warming are simply a refinement due to better data on how climate works rather than a reduction in the risk posed by global warming.

One leading UK climate scientist, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity surrounding the report before it is published, said: "The bottom line is that the climate is still warming while our greenhouse gas emissions have accelerated, so we are storing up problems for ourselves in the future."

The IPCC report, seen by The Sunday Telegraph, has been handed to the Government for review before publication.

It warns that carbon dioxide emissions have risen during the past five years by three per cent, well above the 0.4 per cent a year average of the previous two decades. The authors also state that the climate is almost certain to warm by at least 1.5 C during the next 100 years.

Such a rise would be enough to take average summer temperatures in Britain to those seen during the 2003 heatwave, when August temperatures reached a record-breaking 38 C. Unseasonable warmth this year has left many Alpine resorts without snow by the time the ski season started.

Britain can expect more storms of similar ferocity to those that wreaked havoc across the country last week, even bringing a tornado to north-west London.

The IPCC has been forced to halve its predictions for sea-level rise by 2100, one of the key threats from climate change. It says improved data have reduced the upper estimate from 34 in to 17 in.

It also says that the overall human effect on global warming since the industrial revolution is less than had been thought, due to the unexpected levels of cooling caused by aerosol sprays, which reflect heat from the sun.

Large amounts of heat have been absorbed by the oceans, masking the warming effect.

Prof Rick Battarbee, the director of the Environmental Change Research Centre at University College London, warned these masking effects had helped to delay global warming but would lead to larger changes in the future.

He said: "The oceans have been acting like giant storage heaters by trapping heat and carbon dioxide. They might be bit of a time-bomb as they have been masking the real effects of the carbon dioxide we have been releasing into the atmosphere.

"People are very worried about what will happen in 2030 to 2050, as we think that at that point the oceans will no longer be able to absorb the carbon dioxide being emitted. It will be a tipping point and that is why it is now critical to act to counter any acceleration that will occur when this happens."

The report paints a bleak picture for future generations unless greenhouse gas emissions are reduced. It predicts that the climate will warm by 0.2 C a decade for the next two decades if emissions continue at current levels.

The report states that snow cover in mountainous regions will contract and permafrost in polar regions will decline.

However, Julian Morris, executive director of the International Policy Network, urged governments to be cautious. "There needs to be better data before billions of pounds are spent on policy measures that may have little impact," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: change; climate; climatechange; environment; globalwarming; globalwarmingping; impact; ipcc; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2006 7:19:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Like I care.


2 posted on 12/09/2006 7:21:16 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It also says that the overall human effect on global warming since the industrial revolution is less than had been thought, due to the unexpected levels of cooling caused by aerosol sprays, which reflect heat from the sun.

I am sure there will be those here who will say the French have not been doing their part...

3 posted on 12/09/2006 7:22:25 PM PST by sionnsar (?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Gee Thanks UN

I don't know how I ever survived before the UN decided that it is the know all, be all World Government.

TT


4 posted on 12/09/2006 7:22:31 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hmmmmm?? Gore will not be happy with this.


5 posted on 12/09/2006 7:26:56 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It's the Sun, Stupid!


6 posted on 12/09/2006 7:28:45 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts ("So, I put on some tangerine lip gloss and answered the door.. I was one lucky woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

And Algore says …


7 posted on 12/09/2006 7:28:47 PM PST by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Somebody tell Fat Al!
His movie needs a rewrite.


8 posted on 12/09/2006 7:30:19 PM PST by Mr. Peabody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

Just watched Michael Crighton from the National Press club commenting on how one cannot predict the future and scientists have to reveal their data. Interesting. He would mock the scientist here who wants to be unnamed.


9 posted on 12/09/2006 7:32:15 PM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Funny, most of the supposed effects of "global warming" sound kinda nice.


10 posted on 12/09/2006 7:37:08 PM PST by xjcsa (Stop global climate stagnation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
the panel reports that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has accelerated in the past five years.

wow,it really is Bush

11 posted on 12/09/2006 7:37:32 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Mankind has had less effect on global warming than previously supposed, a United Nations report on climate change will claim next year.
-----
Ya think ??? Amazing how well trying to rewrite the history of the earth did not work ----- maybe there is some hope for mankind from those seeking fact over "convenient fiction"....


12 posted on 12/09/2006 7:38:42 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Mankind has had less effect on global warming than previously supposed, says The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Why! That's heresy! Stone'em!

This will cause Al Gore to cry!!!!

Oh the huge manatee!!!!
13 posted on 12/09/2006 7:38:49 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Al Gore is likely to have a massive stroke when he reads this.


14 posted on 12/09/2006 7:40:17 PM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
LOL, f* idiots.... I almost support dictatorships when I consider how reckless the current bunch of jerk-offs are leading the world.
15 posted on 12/09/2006 7:40:22 PM PST by Porterville (Fight without rules. Fight until only one side stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

One good belch from Mt. St. Helens can put more in the atmosphere than all of mankind has since mankind walked the planet.


16 posted on 12/09/2006 7:40:46 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

:)


17 posted on 12/09/2006 7:43:38 PM PST by xowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam

No doubt these scientists are in the pay of Big Oil, like anyone else who lessens the effect of mankind on global warming.

Right?


18 posted on 12/09/2006 7:45:52 PM PST by HarryCaul (www.whitehousepresscorps.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Interesting how, after the Democrats win an election, all these major problems seem to fade away.


19 posted on 12/09/2006 8:09:18 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Yay!!! They will be able to raise more crops (and certain plants) like they did in Roman times and in the Iron Age before it got colder.


Those 'scientists' are cowards who probably fear to lose their jobs because they KNOW that the Leftards and Libtards in charge dont care about facts/reason and logic -- only their dim socialist political agenda.


The fact that the UN would publish such a report is a sign that the counter evidence is too strong for them to lie about it. The truth is actually still far from what they allow themselves to admit.
20 posted on 12/09/2006 8:10:04 PM PST by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson