Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: ELECTIONS 2006

Posted on 11/07/2006 5:04:31 PM PST by Dog

Please Mods can we have one central Live thread ...its tough jumping from thread to thread to get results.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,641-7,6607,661-7,6807,681-7,700 ... 7,761-7,777 next last
To: olde north church

Why blame Evangelicals?

Of course nobody is "above reproach," but I'd argue that Evangelicals have done more to help the Republican party than any other group. My church, for example, made hundreds of phone calls encouraging conservative-leaning voters to get out and vote. Evangelicals poured millions of dollars into the campaigns.

I just don't understand your anti-Evangelical attitude, other than a simple bigotry against those who trust God.


7,661 posted on 11/08/2006 5:53:49 AM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6128 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
Great sarcasm

thing is ... it wasn't sarcasm

they want a change .... they will get it

7,662 posted on 11/08/2006 5:59:05 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6437 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Filibusters are usually a better threat than actual tactic, a desperate measure that shows one doesn't have the votes to defeat appointment and one that many "conservative" Dems up for reelection in 2008 wouldn't support.

Besides, since filibuster of SCOTUS appointment has never before occurred, how about a "recess appointment"? :~) That would force a filibuster wide open. Maybe Senate Dems can appeal to SCOTUS to rule on whether "recess appointment" of SCOTUS justice would be legal :~) Imagine the possibilities... and voters reaction to these Dems' hijinks.


7,663 posted on 11/08/2006 6:00:09 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7659 | View Replies]

To: Theo

You are so right; there is no sense in being angry with those who trust in God. Prayers for those who lost in yesterday's voting. May they and their wonderful families go forward in positive ways.


7,664 posted on 11/08/2006 6:01:18 AM PST by YepYep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7661 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

This country survived clintoon for 8 years. We'll survive this abomination as well. Maybe now the republicans will grow a spine.


7,665 posted on 11/08/2006 6:12:36 AM PST by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6460 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
The summer heat is pretty hard to take, which is why I'm either in my pool or in my house from May to September...but I absolutely cannot stand snow so I guess I'm limited when it comes to places to live!

Good luck in Colorado!

7,666 posted on 11/08/2006 6:21:25 AM PST by IrishRainy (The only way BJ Clinton would have nailed bin Laden is if Ossama had been a White House intern.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7621 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Wait until they see their 40K's tank.

Yep.

7,667 posted on 11/08/2006 6:25:58 AM PST by beyond the sea ( If it were ever going to happen, no drilling in Anwar now, kids. Congrats voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7660 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
DeWine is a REAL Conservative? LOL

I was listing DeWine as a RINO. The guy asked me to name a RINO who lost. That was thousands of posts ago.

7,668 posted on 11/08/2006 6:26:43 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ("Thanks, Tom DeLay, for practically giving me your seat"-Nick Lampson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6051 | View Replies]

To: Theo; All
Why blame Evangelicals?

Of course nobody is "above reproach," but I'd argue that Evangelicals have done more to help the Republican party than any other group. My church, for example, made hundreds of phone calls encouraging conservative-leaning voters to get out and vote. Evangelicals poured millions of dollars into the campaigns.

I just don't understand your anti-Evangelical attitude, other than a simple bigotry against those who trust God.

I'm not giving Evangelicals any larger percentage of blame than any other group involved in this catastrophe but facts are facts. This group abandoned the first President Bush and were the mid-wives of the first Clinton victory. In plain English, they forget to "render unto Caesar, what is Caesar's", how many innocent babies have they condemned to death before take their first breath outside the womb because their noses were put out of joint over Schiavo?

A telling comment from Cal Thomas on News Watch some time ago, Conservative Christians, Catholics, Evangelicals should no longer feel obligated to President Bush 43 because of the Stem Cell Bill he signed. Getting back to Caeser, now, they have as much an obligation to their fellow citizens in maintaining a "good and just" government as another other aspect of their religious life. Are they that foolish they can now live their lives in peace?

Perhaps, I shouldn't use the term "Evangelicals" as a synonym for Christians/Catholics, I know religion well enough to know they are but one part of the Religous Right who have let us down once again.

7,669 posted on 11/08/2006 6:33:00 AM PST by olde north church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7661 | View Replies]

To: ReyDM

I went to the Arizona secretary of state board for the official election results. Prop 107, the defense of marriage initiative, lost 48.x to 51.x.


7,670 posted on 11/08/2006 6:35:08 AM PST by IrishRainy (The only way BJ Clinton would have nailed bin Laden is if Ossama had been a White House intern.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7619 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The President allowed the leftists and their media to define the war, as well as a whole host of other issues. As much as we sometimes hold the average politician with disdain for their seeking out the cameras, that's what we needed before this election. Unfortunately, some Republicans need their hand held and to be schmoozed.


7,671 posted on 11/08/2006 6:41:37 AM PST by kenth (There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7603 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
An aide to Sen. Conrad Burns (R) tells the Hotline this morning that Burns has no plans to concede the MT Senate race anytime soon. The aide said that 21K absentee ballots have yet to be counted and other counties still haven’t finished canvassing their regular returns. Democratic officials are confident that Jon Tester (D) will win.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1734746/posts

7,672 posted on 11/08/2006 6:47:30 AM PST by CedarDave ("O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." ~ Voltaire. "Will John Kerry do?" - Lord (courtesy catpuppy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7630 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Yellowstone County supposedly counted the absentee ballots before counting other ballots and is now 100% reporting per CNN. I'm not sure how it worked in other places, but unless Burns' people are correct, he ain't winning.

There also seems to be some turnout discrepancy in certain areas - Gallatin, Lake and Yellowstone Counties have higher turnout than in 2000, yet many other counties do not, and the vote tally statewide lags. Whether this is because they haven't counted absentees or simply because more people voted in those areas is not clear.

I've yo-yoed on this race all day - at one point, it looked impossible for Burns win. Then, the extrapolations were looking good. Now, it looks downright impossible that he'd win unless the absentee votes are actually out and are from Republican-leaning areas. I'm NOT optimistic.
7,673 posted on 11/08/2006 6:53:02 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7672 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
As long as Rick concedes with grace, he stands in good stead for another post.

And he did. I watched as much as I could stand. It was surreal. Casey is a shell of a man compared to Santorum. I never knew until last night that Casey is pro-life, I'd never heard that. Seems like he kept that on the backburner just in case running on his daddy's coattails or the war weren't enough. Well, I hope we see more of Rick. PA has taken a turn for the worse last night, and we will need Rick and more like him to pull us out in the future.

7,674 posted on 11/08/2006 6:55:05 AM PST by fortunecookie (My computer is fried, but I'm back with a temporary set up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5584 | View Replies]

To: Dog
**** Okay this is my FIRST and ONLY Commentary on Election Eve/The Day After 06' ****

My 2cents on Election 2006 (08 Nov 2006)

This election is a HUGE blow to the Republican Party.. make no mistake about it.. this election is all about IRAQ.... Many if not MOST of the "Republican" seats that went to the Democrats were taken by "moderate" Democrats.. however Watch for the FAR LEFT (Kennedy et al) to try and tout this victory as an endorsement of the FAR LEFT agenda...

Having said that.. When the votes are counted in Virgina and Montana.. no matter how close the vote is.. I suggest that the Republicans stand united and ACCEPT the results and not pull any Democrat stunts (ie Bush/Gore) if that means handing the gavels (committee chaires) to the Democrats, than so be it.... we need to keep the focus on 08' and not forget what brought us to this point.. keep your head up... and lets motivate our conservative base to come out in 08'......

That's all I got to say about that....

Toward victory in 08' !!!

David
www.DavidOsborne.net

7,675 posted on 11/08/2006 6:56:27 AM PST by davidosborne (DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

Cool. Enjoy!!!!


7,676 posted on 11/08/2006 6:57:00 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7614 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

I don't know man.. I have a hard time explaining how these democrats who took over the republican seats could be actually not far far to the left.

Best hope which is very little would be pressure these new democrats to not vote for any of these amnesty bill.


7,677 posted on 11/08/2006 7:02:19 AM PST by BoogieEyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7675 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Toward victory in 08' !!!

It's hard to imagine the public loving the Dems two years from now.

7,678 posted on 11/08/2006 7:23:01 AM PST by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7675 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

All the Democrats see in rise in the stock market is what money it can take away from stockholders and investers.


7,679 posted on 11/08/2006 7:30:03 AM PST by oyez (Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7133 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

"The problem in Iraq isn't the casulaties, it's a sense of a lack of forward motion."


Sad but true.


7,680 posted on 11/08/2006 7:30:17 AM PST by BLS (If it breathes, tax it, and if it stops breathing, find its children and tax them (DNC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7143 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 7,641-7,6607,661-7,6807,681-7,700 ... 7,761-7,777 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson