Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. candidate won't quit if charged [Tan Nguyen vows to fight]
Associated Press ^ | October 24, 2006 | GILLIAN FLACCUS

Posted on 10/24/2006 7:17:41 PM PDT by freedomdefender

A Republican congressional candidate whose campaign was linked to an intimidating letter sent to Hispanic voters said Tuesday he would not quit the race if he is charged with a crime.

ADVERTISEMENT

"If you're innocent and somebody charges you, would you give up? No, you've got to fight," said Tan Nguyen, who is seeking to unseat five-term Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez (news, bio, voting record) in California's 47th Congressional District.

"Innocent people can be persecuted," he told The Associated Press.

The state Department of Justice has opened a voting rights investigation into the letter sent to certain Democratic voters in Orange County.

The letter, written in Spanish, warned: "You are advised that if your residence in this country is illegal or you are an immigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that could result in jail time."

Immigrants who have become naturalized U.S. citizens are eligible to vote.

Nguyen, a Vietnamese immigrant who has made illegal immigration a centerpiece of his campaign, was interviewed at his campaign office. It was open for the first time since being raided last week by investigators who seized computers, political signs and other items.

Nguyen said he purchased a database of 14,000 Hispanic voters from a Burbank company called Political Data Inc. so he could send Spanish-language fliers to voters. He said his campaign sent four fliers using the database before his office manager forwarded the names to an outside party.

Nguyen refused to identify the office manager or the third party who he said mailed the letters.

He said last week that he believed an employee in his office might have used his campaign's voter database to send the letter without his knowledge.

He reiterated that he did not authorize or approve the intimidating letter and said neither he nor any of his three paid campaign staff members wrote or funded the mailing.

"It has to be clear: I didn't authorize it, I didn't approve it, we didn't send it out from the campaign. People who are saying that it's coming from the campaign is a fat lie," he said.

Asked whether any campaign volunteers were responsible for the mailing, Nguyen referred questions to his attorney.

William Braniff, his campaign attorney, said a volunteer drafted an English version of the letter and e-mailed it to a volunteer who translated it into Spanish. The office manager forwarded the database of Hispanic voters to a volunteer, said Braniff, who declined to give the name of the office manager.

Nathan Barankin, spokesman for the state Department of Justice, had no immediate comment on Nguyen's account. Sanchez's campaign has said it would not comment until after the investigation is complete.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 47thdistrict; demdirtytricks; immigrantlist; intimidatingletter; lorettasanchez; nathanbarankin; orangecounty; politicaldatainc; tannguyen; theoc; williambraniff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: muawiyah
The Democrats tried this down in Cunningham's old district. The Dem candidate, a woman again, just like in Tan's district, actually went out in public and solicited illegal aliens to vote for her.

Francine Busby. It's a good thing she lost in the special election, and she ought to lose again next month.

81 posted on 10/25/2006 12:10:03 AM PDT by heleny (NO on all bonds/taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Squeako
You are always waiting for what you call the "race card" to be dropped. Sometimes racism pops up in these campaigns, but you are there to call it the "race card".

Get a clue yourself ~ racism is alive and well in California, and it has its own cheerleading squad who get out there every single time to distract folks from it.

Mr. Nguyen did nothing wrong ~ he's the Republican candidate. He commands our support.

82 posted on 10/25/2006 4:05:57 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Yes, the Orange County Republican Committee and Herr Schwarzenegger attacked Tan without first getting any facts.

That's usually a sign of raw racism at work, and it's not surprising at all.

83 posted on 10/25/2006 4:41:03 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VxH
Hardly ~ earlier posts refer to earlier Nguyen statements that he had already undertaken a thorough investigation of the matter and had answers for every serious question ~ which were then provided.

Are you sure you have read this thread or did you just read the news piece and then jump to the end with material we've chewed up, digested, and disposed of already?

84 posted on 10/25/2006 4:46:41 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: old republic

I think we can all agree that the wording in the letter is not the best.


85 posted on 10/25/2006 5:20:50 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Like someone noted, we are having difficulty convincing some FReepers that "emigrate" and "immigrate" mean different things in English.

"E" prefixing a verb usually means "EX" or "OUT OF". "I" prefixing a verb usually means "IN" or "INTO".

There, with that satisfied, notice that in Spanish we have the exact same structure.

Could it be we are both drawing on the same fundamental Latin/Ladino usage? Or is there a mystery here unfathomable by RINOs and Democratic party hacks?

Ah, yes, now I see ~ "EX" and "IN" are all same thing to RINO/DEMhack people ~ ah, so! Resume place in line awaiting scraps from the table of our betters.

86 posted on 10/25/2006 5:48:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Sounds like a plan to me.


87 posted on 10/25/2006 10:46:45 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000

READ the letter it says if you are here ILLEGALLY you cannot vote. I don't understand how anyone can make an issue of the letter, even if you are a legal resident you still cannot vote unless you are a citizen. I always tell folks words mean things, read the words.


88 posted on 10/25/2006 10:51:53 AM PDT by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000

Sorry before hand for losing my patience:
NO you idiot, naturalized citizens can vote, legal residents CANNOT vote.


89 posted on 10/25/2006 10:54:45 AM PDT by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
If "scare tactics", namely a recitation of the law, deters people from unlawfully voting or attempting to vote, seems to me that's to the good.

Unless you are planning on using a bunch of unlawful voters yourself to win the election. You aren't are you?

90 posted on 10/25/2006 2:17:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thinkthenpost
Tan Nguyen being interviewed NOW by John and Ken, FKI radio

http://2005.kfi640.com/pages/streaming.html

91 posted on 10/25/2006 5:19:14 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Well, since some here love to point fingers and label people the enemy for an opposing opinion I'll just leave my comments as is.


92 posted on 10/25/2006 7:24:03 PM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: thinkthenpost

I never resorted to calling names. My contention is the letter is poorly worded. This may be due to translation but even naturalized citizens are referred to as immigrants these days by themselves and others. I would never call you an idiot sir, can you refrain?


93 posted on 10/25/2006 7:27:48 PM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
>>did you just read the news piece
 
Nope. 
 
I Heard / saw the words come straight out his mouth in a videotaped interview.
 
He said he knew nothing and it was all somebody else's fault.
 
I stand by my post.
 
>>earlier posts refer to earlier Nguyen statements that he had already undertaken a thorough investigation
 
Oh lookie - another backpeddling politician.
 
I saw what I saw and heard what I heard.   He can't take it back.
 
Next candidate please...

94 posted on 10/25/2006 7:45:01 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: bboop

>>He was shifty and would not answer the most straight-forward questions

Quack quack waddle waddle... politician.


95 posted on 10/25/2006 7:51:48 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: VxH

ROFL


96 posted on 10/25/2006 7:53:47 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
 
>>The crux of this discussion revolves around the meaning of words and the intentions of the authors.
 
The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all.
 
He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

97 posted on 10/25/2006 8:18:10 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: VxH
The crux is that he's not taking responsibility for the letter being written at all. He'd better be able to prove that his enemies created this document - otherwise his political career is a non-starter.

Here's the latest:

1) Defendant admits prior knowledge of the original letter.
2) Defendant asserts he did not compose or authorize distribution of the letter reviewed
3) Defendant asserts that his campaign has been effectively ended by the AG who confiscated his resources.
4) Defendant's antagonists have now switched to his recent residential change, a sign that defendant will prevail in the hate crime investigation.

98 posted on 10/25/2006 8:35:48 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
>>Tan said he has rehired the staffer he fired over this
 
Why would he have fired a staffer if this was true:
 
"It has to be clear: I didn't authorize it, I didn't approve it, we didn't send it out from the campaign. People who are saying that it's coming from the campaign is a fat lie[emphasis added]"
 
?????
 
It didn't come from the campaign, but he fired one of his staff.  Hmmmmm.
 
Not an impressive example of judgement and / or integrity any way you slice it.
 
 

99 posted on 10/25/2006 8:38:41 PM PDT by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VxH

I heard him on the radio this evening. Thought he did pretty well. The hosts, John and Ken, seemed to think so, too.


100 posted on 10/25/2006 8:42:16 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson