Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Democratic Sweep -- and then what?
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | October 22, 2006 | Robert J. Caldwell

Posted on 10/22/2006 8:02:16 AM PDT by kellynla

The conventional wisdom (how often does it prove wrong?) is that the 2006 midterm elections will be 1994 in reverse. The Republican tsunami of that year will be replicated this year by a Democratic wave that will wrest control of the House of Representatives and perhaps the Senate, too, from the GOP.

That may happen. Certainly the polls suggest a dismal night Nov. 7 for the Republicans.

And yet, there is one especially startling difference between the 1994 GOP blowout and the apparently pending Democratic sweep this year.

In 1994, Republicans nationalized the midterm congressional elections by uniting around a national agenda, Newt Gingrich's Contract With America, endorsed by 370 Republican congressional candidates. In stark contrast, the Democrats this year have no agreed-upon national agenda.

The Democrats' strategy, to the extent they have one, is to make the 2006 midterms a referendum on an unpopular president and an unpopular war. That may be enough to get them elected, but then what?

Here is where the 1994 analogy breaks down completely. Gingrich and the new Republican majorities in the House and Senate went on to pull Bill Clinton's erratic presidency back toward the center from its liberal excesses of 1993-94. Welfare reform, spending restraint, and a balanced-budget compact followed by successive years of budget surpluses were all products of the Gingrich revolution in Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: democrats; election; elections; gop; republicans; votegop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
"The Democrats' lack of a governing agenda allows the Republicans an opening they can yet exploit. It's never a plus in politics if you can tell voters what you're against but not what you're for.

Beyond the Democrats' missing agenda, Bush strategist Karl Rove and Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman have one last ace to play. In the final 72 hours before this election, they will implement the most sophisticated and best-financed plan ever devised for mobilizing the GOP base and getting its voters to the polls. Democrats have nothing like it."

1 posted on 10/22/2006 8:02:16 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

if Democrats win the House...

John Conyers will take over the Judiciary Committee and he has promised to launch impeachment hearings.

Two years of impeachment hearings !


2 posted on 10/22/2006 8:05:20 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The Democrats don't know they are for. They will probably make sizeable gains but you can never bet the house against a GOP comeback at the last moment.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

3 posted on 10/22/2006 8:05:41 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
. Democrats have nothing like it."

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Wrong! the democrats have the contract with Al Queida. (smile)
4 posted on 10/22/2006 8:07:38 AM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I sort of think that two years of impeachment hearings may only help the GOP's chances in 08.


5 posted on 10/22/2006 8:07:52 AM PDT by zook (America going insane - "Do you read Sutter Caine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

"unpopular president and an unpopular war."

Saying it doesn't make it so.


6 posted on 10/22/2006 8:09:10 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Yawn more cheerleading for the democrats.

JMO, the drive by media is in for a surprise the morning of November 8th.

They will be proven fallible and will lose even more influence.

7 posted on 10/22/2006 8:12:12 AM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zook

You have a good point.

Many voted for Perot and against Bush 41...then we got Clinton.

Thus we should not make that same mistake.

IMHO


8 posted on 10/22/2006 8:12:18 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zook

I don't think they will actually have impeachment hearings. I think that is just a carrot dangling in front of the noses of liberals to get them to vote Democrat. Vote for us and we will make your dreams come true and impeach the President, but they know they can't possibly do that and when it gets right down to it they will come up with some line about there being more important things to concentrate on to 'fix' what the evil Republicans have done to our country.


9 posted on 10/22/2006 8:13:38 AM PDT by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

It really is lame. I watched the RI senate debates last night. The Dem talked about bringing troops home by December, raising FICA cap to reform Social Security and eliminating the donut hole in Medicare D Prescription drug plan. That was it. If elected, my guess is that he could not do any of these.


10 posted on 10/22/2006 8:16:30 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Welfare reform, spending restraint, and a balanced-budget compact followed by successive years of budget surpluses were all products of the Gingrich revolution in Congress.

Bill Clinton: "No they weren't. Those were all my ideas. The Republicans stole my ideas and then forced me to sign them into law."

11 posted on 10/22/2006 8:16:54 AM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Certainly the polls suggest a dismal night Nov. 7 for the Republicans.

The media have certainly have firmly set that meme. Of course, if the media's polling reports had been accurate in 2004, we would have President Kerry in office.

Their "polling" seems to be less about presenting some sort of reasonable guess about future events and more about trying to drive those events. Certainly with the lack of accuracy that these "polls" have shown, it seems ridiculous to actually use them as a news source --- paying a haruspex to create an "entrails" report would be about as credible based on polling's equally embarrassing track record.

12 posted on 10/22/2006 8:18:08 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

13 posted on 10/22/2006 8:18:19 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

“He wanted to be a haruspex, but didn’t have the guts.”


14 posted on 10/22/2006 8:23:09 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

The only polling I'm interested in is 11/7.
Every time I hear one of these polls I am reminded of the polls that stated that Gore would beat Bush in 2000 and Kerry would beat Bush in 2004...and we know how correct those polls were. LMAO


15 posted on 10/22/2006 8:25:37 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Well after they sweep the House, the grarage needs it, and so does the wood workshop floor, the front drive could use a good sweep too, .... oh! That's not the sweep you were talking about.

Still for most of the Dems doing that sort of sweep would shock their spouses. I'm sorry "Significant Other" < /--- pcism < phleeepppppp!

16 posted on 10/22/2006 8:29:17 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

If the democrats win you will see the following:

1. Stevens and maybe Ginsburgh will retire from the bench. The seats will stay vacant until 2008 in the hopes that a Democrat will be elected. Any Bush appointee to any bench will be immediately tied up in committee. Upon a Dem win in 08, the RATS will immediately go nuclear, pushing through their lib appointees.

2. Bush will veto everything and the RATS and the MSM will accuse Bush of obstruction.

3. Any comrimise bills that do make it to Bush's desk will be praised on day one then hammered by the RATS as Republican pandering.

4. Funds for the war will be cut off and a date for withdrawal tabled. Bush will be forced to sign it and then the RATS will label Republicans the party of cut and run.

5. Impeachment.

6. Tax cuts eliminated. Bush will try to make them permanent but without the majority, it won't happen.

7. Interest rates will rise, unemployment will rise, taxes will rise, inflation will rise and the RATS and the MSM will blame Bush.


17 posted on 10/22/2006 8:34:15 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Murtha is even cutting and running from a debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I simply dont believe and dont agree with the notion that only the GOP can do GOTV. Actually here in our county, the Dems are pretty welloiled on GOTV. It depends on the area.

GOVT btw doesnt happen out of thin air. It take *volunteer effort* to help make it happen* ... So if you want to help defend the GOP Congress, here is what you can do:
1. Write letter to editor.
2. Call GOP HQ and ask if you can do some calling
- calling just 50 people (takes one hour) can help remind enough people to increase voting by 5-10%. That is, of the 50 people, maybe 35 would vote anyway, 10 wont vote anyway, but there will be 5 of them who wouldnt have voted who now have a reminder that pushes them over the edge to vote...

3. Get your friends, neighbors, colleagues etc. to vote Republican.
Get the message in front of them about how screwed up the Democrats are.


18 posted on 10/22/2006 8:38:58 AM PDT by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Exactly


19 posted on 10/22/2006 8:41:10 AM PDT by Kaslin (No matter what the left says. G.W. Bush will be remembered as the best president of this century)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WOSG


20 posted on 10/22/2006 8:42:46 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson