Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop
Hearsay is admissible in civil courts.

BS.  The crap out there on the net about this supposed police report is 100% impeachable and worthless.  No competent judge would allow it and, if they did, they would be reversed on appeal in about 10 seconds.

This would 100% require the original police report.  If this went to court that would be made available under court order.  If the report provided by the police matched what is on the web then we're in business, but that is hardly a foregone conclusion, or are you that dumb?  If you are then I have this bridge I want to sell you in Brooklyn.

Again, I'm not challenging the conclusion, if evidence can be provided.  I'm challenging both the evidence and THE INTELLIGENCE AND HONESTY of the folks pushing rumor as if it were fact. 

Now I'm beginning to question what the agenda is of those who are so invested in proving that Mel Gibson is "the son of Satan."  Might there be a Moby in the mix?  Maybe a Pelosi warrior?  It's clear that some in the DBM are serving that agenda.  Are folks here?  What is the motive of those who are so anxious to trash someone without verifiable proof?   Could it be political?  Could it be associated with trying to trash the Christian voters, particularly those associated with embracing Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ?  Particularly in the two and one half weeks before the election?  Enguiring minds want to know.  What, pray tell, is your motivation here?

Is that you, Moby? 

70 posted on 10/19/2006 6:10:53 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
" Now I'm beginning to question what the agenda is of those who are so invested in proving that Mel Gibson is "the son of Satan." Might there be a Moby in the mix? Maybe a Pelosi warrior? It's clear that some in the DBM are serving that agenda. Are folks here? What is the motive of those who are so anxious to trash someone without verifiable proof? Could it be political? Could it be associated with trying to trash the Christian voters, particularly those associated with embracing Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ? Particularly in the two and one half weeks before the election? Enguiring minds want to know. What, pray tell, is your motivation here?

Is that you, Moby?
"

Circular arguments are fun. Photocopies and witnesses can be more fun than that.

"four pages of the original report prepared by the arresting officer in the case" (TMZ)
http://cdn.digitalcity.com/tmz_documents/gibson_wm_docs_072806.pdf
76 posted on 10/19/2006 6:25:42 PM PDT by familyop (Roma est perdita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok
"Now I'm beginning to question what the agenda is of those who are so invested in proving that Mel Gibson is "the son of Satan." Might there be a Moby in the mix? Maybe a Pelosi warrior? It's clear that some in the DBM are serving that agenda. Are folks here? What is the motive of those who are so anxious to trash someone without verifiable proof? Could it be political? Could it be associated with trying to trash the Christian voters, particularly those associated with embracing Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ? Particularly in the two and one half weeks before the election? Enguiring minds want to know. What, pray tell, is your motivation here?

Is that you, Moby?
"

LOL! [Note to myself to avoid hiring this person to represent me.]
83 posted on 10/19/2006 6:43:29 PM PDT by familyop (Roma est perdita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson