[familyop]

" Now I'm beginning to question what the agenda is of those who are so invested in proving that Mel Gibson is "the son of Satan." Might there be a Moby in the mix? Maybe a Pelosi warrior? It's clear that some in the DBM are serving that agenda. Are folks here? What is the motive of those who are so anxious to trash someone without verifiable proof? Could it be political? Could it be associated with trying to trash the Christian voters, particularly those associated with embracing Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ? Particularly in the two and one half weeks before the election? Enguiring minds want to know. What, pray tell, is your motivation here?

Is that you, Moby? "

Circular arguments are fun. Photocopies and witnesses can be more fun than that.

"four pages of the original report prepared by the arresting officer in the case" (TMZ)
http://cdn.digitalcity.com/tmz_documents/gibson_wm_docs_072806.pdf

[Phsstpok]

photocopies of illegally obtained "evidence" are 100% valueless.

Are you that stupid?

Do you think this is admissible? If so you are a complete moron. If it's not admissible then it doesn't exist. I can photocopy a police report where you bugger the Queen of England and post it on the web. Should we all believe that?

This is not rocket science folks. I'm beginning to think that I'm involved with Al Gores chromosome deficient morons.

Think! This is simple. I don't care what you think about this. I don't care what you believe about this. I care what you can prove about this. TMZ, "leaked documents" and other fantasies are 100% worthless. Do you get it?