You already specifically challenged someone on the contents of the report. Hearsay is admissible in civil courts. Getting a copy of a police report is no crime, AFAIK. TMZ is showing a copy, and the same news company probably has hardcopy.
* I am not an attorney. If readers of this message want legal advice, they should seek properly licensed attorneys.
But I appears that you are an attorney (and if so, one I would not hire).
BS. The crap out there on the net about this supposed police report is 100% impeachable and worthless. No competent judge would allow it and, if they did, they would be reversed on appeal in about 10 seconds.
This would 100% require the original police report. If this went to court that would be made available under court order. If the report provided by the police matched what is on the web then we're in business, but that is hardly a foregone conclusion, or are you that dumb? If you are then I have this bridge I want to sell you in Brooklyn.
Again, I'm not challenging the conclusion, if evidence can be provided. I'm challenging both the evidence and THE INTELLIGENCE AND HONESTY of the folks pushing rumor as if it were fact.
Now I'm beginning to question what the agenda is of those who are so invested in proving that Mel Gibson is "the son of Satan." Might there be a Moby in the mix? Maybe a Pelosi warrior? It's clear that some in the DBM are serving that agenda. Are folks here? What is the motive of those who are so anxious to trash someone without verifiable proof? Could it be political? Could it be associated with trying to trash the Christian voters, particularly those associated with embracing Mel Gibson's movie The Passion of the Christ? Particularly in the two and one half weeks before the election? Enguiring minds want to know. What, pray tell, is your motivation here?
Is that you, Moby?