Listen to Rush on Line.
http://www.jasoncann.org/radio.htm
http://radio.findanisp.com/radio-shows-on-air.php
1 posted on
10/11/2006 8:49:04 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
To: HOYA97; ICFN(ICan'tFixNothing); StoneWall Brigade; ct_libertarian; TheRobb7; Collier; acsrp38; ...
Are these days getting longer? Seems like 24 hours is forever in the news cycle these days.
2 posted on
10/11/2006 8:49:49 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
To: MNJohnnie
golf discussing or foley again?
3 posted on
10/11/2006 8:50:06 AM PDT by
Kewlhand`tek
(Those that can't , Teach. Those that can't teach , Report)
To: MNJohnnie
Here ... work N lurk mode On.
Now playing, the techno version of "Hu Let The Norks Out ... Hu ... Hu"
6 posted on
10/11/2006 8:52:46 AM PDT by
sono
("Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards." Samuel Huntington)
To: MNJohnnie
7 posted on
10/11/2006 8:53:10 AM PDT by
CAWats
(Post to Free Republic without knowing HTML. Click my name.)
To: All
HI EVERYONE
We have a little fun homework
This is the link to the "too hot for TV" GOP commercial
and YES Madalin Albright DID give an autographed Michael Jordan basketball to Kim Yung Il as a gift during the Clinton's bilateral fiasco.
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/10/video-the-zucker-ad/
or
http://lonestartimes.com/2006/10/10/campaign-ad-you-will-never-see/
avoid the YouTube censorship attempt with above links. youTube slapped a controversial label on it ONLY because it was against democrats. The anti-republican stuff is still open to all
Somebody spent REAL MONEY on these commercials FOR THE GOP! (yes really!)
11 posted on
10/11/2006 9:00:42 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: MNJohnnie
15 posted on
10/11/2006 9:04:37 AM PDT by
Matchett-PI
(To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
To: MNJohnnie
Good afternoon Johnnie, The President was Spot on and ended just in time as Rush himself duly noted...Here in work, lurk, n'lunch mode...and yeah, the Press HAS been sophomoric for a while now...
24 posted on
10/11/2006 9:08:51 AM PDT by
LibertyLee
(George W. Bush a Great President--US out of the UN and UN out of the US!)
To: MNJohnnie
LOVED the Bush presser. He kicks their @$$. Press seemed really out of energy and asked WEAK questions.
26 posted on
10/11/2006 9:09:26 AM PDT by
MaestroLC
("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
To: MNJohnnie
Got the office computers back up after an hour of blessed silence (and non-working coffee break).
DID miss some FReeping/lurking, and back into Work n' Lurk mode.
29 posted on
10/11/2006 9:10:41 AM PDT by
Unrepentant VN Vet
(I can't really accept a welcome home until the last MIA does.)
To: MNJohnnie
33 posted on
10/11/2006 9:12:19 AM PDT by
Republican Red
("There’s God, then there’s the president and then there's my father.”- 6 yr old Jack Roberts)
To: MNJohnnie
Ellen Taucher loses it and insults a caller because he pointed out her hypocrisy. Dems are melting down.
92 posted on
10/11/2006 9:28:47 AM PDT by
hattend
(Carpe Macaca)
To: MNJohnnie
How can she possibly say the RATs were for missile defense? I'd think people would flee from her to get away from the lightning bolt. That is the most outrageous lie I've heard since Hillary last opened her mouth.
168 posted on
10/11/2006 9:50:00 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
To: All
That caller, Michael I think, from NY, the one who chewed up that Demcorat Congresswoman on C-SPAN, he's AWESOME!!! I'm sure glad he called in to Rush's show. He's awesome. Wish more NY'ers were like him. :) The idea that Democrats are now trying to say they want missile defense is beyond intellectually insulting. All my life, for the psat 20+ years, Democrats have loudly opposed anything to do with missile defense, they've voted against it, and just like Michael said, they vote down ANYTHING to do with it that ever comes to a vote on the floor of the House and Senate. This serious case of selective amnesia with them now saying they support it will TOTALLY fail. Most all voters will scratch their heads and recall Democrats opposing missile defense FOREVER!!! I especially love the stupid Congressbabe Tausher's comment that they want REAL missile defense, a better one, that works, not one that's testing constantly.
How does one make sure something works without testing it? The current military missile defense shield program has shot down every test missile fired for it to shoot down. It's been EXTREMELY effective and technicians and military personnel have said it's performing BETTER than they expected! How would this liberal babe improve on that? Democrats are just failed policies and programs looking for a place to happen. God willing America will vote its conscience and not let them happen in January. The GOP will gain seats, and will NOT lose the House or Senate. Period. Get stoked conservatives. :) The time to fight and win is coming.
279 posted on
10/11/2006 10:11:03 AM PDT by
TexasPatriot8
(The Democrats gave up trying to win elections on issues, they're now trying to win on fixed scandle.)
To: All
It's funny seeing how things are still falling apart for the liberals. Now the Foley scam is biting them in the butt. Everyone knows they sat on it for a year or more, and that it was just a hit piece to tamper with the election. So lame. And now Foley-Gate is a liability for Democrats as more and more comes out that they orchestrated this and planned it, taking away their argument that they were so concerned about the "chi-ren", like Rush said. :) If they were so concerned they would have jumped on it a year ago and not let him continue to talk to the Page's. All this, and gas prices continue to fall, at least until OPEC decides we're getting too good deal and cuts production like they reported this morning, and the economy is still improving, the stock market is the strongest ever, unemployment is down, GDP is up, the deficit is cut in half, and without the Republican majority in Congress, the most meaningful border, terrorist, and voter legislation in years wouldn't exist today, and they do because of the past month of GOP action in Congress. That's a fact.
Issues are what matters, and like Rush said, they can't win on issues because the Democrats are on the losing side of EVERY MAJOR issue. And there WILL be a Supreme Court vacancy in the next two years, either Ginsburg or Stevens probably. Does America want the kind of Supreme Court Justice to fill that vacancy that the Democrats want, like Souter or Breyer? Or the kind of Justice that Bush wants, like Alito and Roberts and Scalia and Thomas? I think MANY voters will be thinking about that also in four weeks. We can FINALLY have a REAL constructionist conservative Supreme Court, and rip away the Democrats auxiliary legislative branch from their clutches, and conservative voters won't flush that opportunity that we've wanted for DECADES, because they're frustrated with RINOs and gutless GOP leadership who won't fight hard. We have the Primaries to take care of that. The election is for defeating liberal Democrats, not sending messages to the GOP leadership.
299 posted on
10/11/2006 10:15:59 AM PDT by
TexasPatriot8
(The Democrats gave up trying to win elections on issues, they're now trying to win on fixed scandle.)
To: MNJohnnie
Hey John Boy...
Can't stay long, but I wanted someone to get Rush's
attention to remind him the MSM has worked the longest
on Nixon's legacy.
302 posted on
10/11/2006 10:17:07 AM PDT by
Jo Nuvark
(Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3)
To: MNJohnnie
HOLD ON NOW! Paraphrasing Fox News Radio from their 2 PM ET broadcast: the deficit is way down, even below WH [optimistic] estimates. That will give the GOP something to crow about for November.
The RATs say "no big deal, it will be going back up in 2010 as the Baby Boomers start hitting SocSec and Medicare." WTF in 10 foot high letters! Do they have the attention span of second graders??? Is that not a frank if inadvertent admission that SocSec is a nightmare waiting to happen??? Do they think that voters cannot string together their past statements and see the absolute contradictions and realize the RATs could care less about the country when they are in a quest for power? This is as bad at that idiot Congresswoman saying the RATs have always been for missile defense. This is unreal!!!
417 posted on
10/11/2006 11:07:21 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
To: devolve; MNJohnnie; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; dixiechick2000; bitt; Smartass; Grampa Dave; ...
Do you believe that Clinton administration was naive in dealing with Kim Jong ?
RamBubba VS Osama
511 posted on
10/11/2006 11:40:18 AM PDT by
potlatch
(Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson