Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill didn't have an 'exit strategy'
National Post ^ | 2006-09-09 | Father Raymond J. de Souza

Posted on 09/09/2006 5:00:04 PM PDT by Clive

Five years is not so very long in the life of nations, but there is a sense that the attacks of Sept. 11 and their aftermath have been too long with us. On Monday, as is right, there will be solemn commemorations and strong statements of resolve.

I was in New York for the first anniversary commemorations and, amidst the still raw emotions, the attitude was resolute. Neither in Canada nor the United States, nor in the West in general, is that the case today. It is an ominous development, because resolve on the home front is the indispensable requirement for vanquishing any enemy abroad. Martial victories are credited to brilliant generals, brave soldiers and advanced weaponry, but behind all that lies the spirit of the people. And the spirit is flagging.

Given the damage inflicted by Islamist terrorists in New York, Washington, Madrid and London -- to say nothing of the ongoing carnage inflicted in Muslim countries -- there is no denying that a serious and violent enemy is being faced. And while every life lost in battle is a cause for grieving, the casualties, measured against history, have not been overwhelming.

And yet, one increasingly hears the view, perhaps shared by majorities in both Canada and the United States, and certainly in Europe, that it would be better just to withdraw, sooner or later, from the whole affair: Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Iran, wherever. Maybe the Islamists would then leave us alone; maybe they wouldn't. But there is a weariness in the air. The price is too high for us, the outcome not sufficiently clear.

It bears remembering that it was during the very bleak days of June, 1940, that Winston Churchill rallied the British people, pledging that "we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." And at the height of the Cold War, it was JFK who was able to promise "that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty." Any leader who tried that today would likely earn not admiration, but derisive laughter. Today commitments must come with conditions, modifications and exit strategies.

Or course it is possible to disagree about this or that policy, this or that war -- as was the case in the great wars of the past. Yet I fear that there is something more profound afoot, a desire simply not to remain in the fight any longer.

"Weariness, Bill -- you cannot yet know literally what it means. I wish no time would come when you do know, but the balance of experience is against it. One day, long hence, you will know true weariness," wrote the old anti-communist Whittaker Chambers, who died in 1961, in his final letter to the young anti-communist William F. Buckley, Jr.

"History hit us with a freight train," he wrote. "But we (my general breed) tried to put ourselves together again. Since this meant outwitting dismemberment, as well as resynthesizing a new lifeview, the sequel might seem rather remarkable, rather more remarkable than what went before. But at a price -- weariness."

Chambers, the communist defector who nailed Alger Hiss, had earned his weariness, though he never lost his resolve. Canada and her allies today appear weary, but it is not clear that we have earned it. The Nazis and the communists counted on the decadent democracies (in their view) proving irresolute and soft in the face of a long, sustained fight. They were wrong. The Islamist terrorists are surely making the same calculation; five years after 9/11, it is not obvious that they too will be wrong.

Chambers' freight train of history went airborne five years ago Monday, and its spectacular brutality requires, now as then, that we put ourselves back together again, outwit the enemy and resynthesize our own world-view. The price is the same -- the toil, and blood and sacrifice that makes men and nations weary.

Weariness is, one supposes, inevitable. The discomfort of the fifth anniversary of 9/11 is that is has come so soon.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: exitstrategy; gwot; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2006 5:00:06 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


2 posted on 09/09/2006 5:00:23 PM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Sure he did, it was victory.
3 posted on 09/09/2006 5:01:09 PM PDT by Vision (God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, love and self-discipline 2Timothy1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Exactly. We did not start this war the Islamo Facist did. So there cannot be an exit strategy until we win.


4 posted on 09/09/2006 5:02:31 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Eeeeeeeeeexxxxxxxxxaaaaaaaaaccccccccttttttllllllllyyyyyy!


5 posted on 09/09/2006 5:02:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

This is going to be a special Anniversary. I can feel it in the air.


6 posted on 09/09/2006 5:03:19 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("Let's Roll!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Great minds...


7 posted on 09/09/2006 5:04:42 PM PDT by RichInOC ("...at all costs...in spite of all terror...however long and hard the road may be...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vision

note the quotation marks in the title


8 posted on 09/09/2006 5:09:46 PM PDT by Murtyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Exit strategy? To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, "Here's my exit strategy: We win, they lose."


9 posted on 09/09/2006 5:13:18 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
Canada ping.

Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.

10 posted on 09/09/2006 5:21:02 PM PDT by fanfan (Trust everybody, but cut the cards yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vision; All
Sure he did, it was victory.

Click to listen.

11 posted on 09/09/2006 5:30:52 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

He didn't need one: It was either Do or DIE.


12 posted on 09/09/2006 5:31:46 PM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

LOL that is the best kind of exit strategy, next to kill them all and let God sort out the mess.


13 posted on 09/09/2006 5:33:03 PM PDT by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clive

"Chambers' freight train of history went airborne five years ago Monday"

LOL
The metaphor isn't tortured, but it is a form of abuse.

I am reminded of the American governments pressuring MLW Worthington Studebaker (yes, that Studebaker) to force MLW's Canadian subsidiary to terminate the planned sale of diesel locomotives to Castro's Cuba. Canadians were upset at this exercise of extranational power by the US.

The question was what the US had to fear from Cuban locomotives. That question conjured up mental images of a Cuban rail borne invasion of the US, with wailing diesel engines roaring up onto the beaches of Miami.

If freight trains can fly, pace the article, then surely they can float.


14 posted on 09/09/2006 5:37:05 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive; fanfan
The title alone says it all - can one imagine what it would have been like during WWII if there were liberal asses running around (I know there were some anti-war leftists, but far fewer than today).
15 posted on 09/09/2006 5:37:31 PM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite (A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!|What if I lecture Americans about America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Right.. Is that why he said "We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." That sounds like a retreat to me. He is proposing to fight until England loses. That is not an exit strategy unless you consider defeat an exit strategy.

If victory was Churchills strategy he would have said. "We shall invade France and Belgium. We shall take Paris, then advance to the Rhine, and in the final battle we shall destroy Berlin."

But that isn't what he said. Is it....

You need to improve your vision .. even your hindsight is not very good.

16 posted on 09/09/2006 5:48:19 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clive

True, but he was prepared to fight on his own turf.


17 posted on 09/09/2006 6:15:37 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Right.. Is that why he said "We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." That sounds like a retreat to me. He is proposing to fight until England loses. That is not an exit strategy unless you consider defeat an exit strategy.

This is not a personal attack. You're an idiot. Good Luck!
18 posted on 09/09/2006 6:23:27 PM PDT by Vision (God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, love and self-discipline 2Timothy1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Ditto.

"Here's my exit strategy:

We win, they lose."

,


19 posted on 09/09/2006 6:26:46 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vision

He may not be an idiot ... more likely, he has not lived long enough to experience the reality of war and an enemy that has sworn to destroy your civilization by making you all convert to Islam.


20 posted on 09/09/2006 6:28:43 PM PDT by rollin (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson