Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Wilson: The End of an Error [Ann Coulter]
Human events online ^ | 7 September 2006 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/06/2006 3:54:01 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

As National Public Radio described the story behind Joe Wilson's amusingly titled book, "The Politics of Truth" (available on the $1 table in fine bookstores everywhere), in May 2004:

"Last July Wilson wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times saying that this particular intelligence regarding Iraq was false. A week later, columnist Robert Novak revealed that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, was a CIA operative."

This is like saying: "John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan; Reagan later died." Every word of that is true, but what it implies -- that Hinckley killed Reagan -- is false.

In the exact same way, the grand White House conspiracy promoted by Wilson and the mainstream media cites chronological events to prove causation.

The media's conspiracy theory is:

Wilson said Bush's famed "16 words" in his 2003 State of the Union address -- "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" -- were a lie.

Wilson's wife was then revealed to be an "undercover" spy at the CIA, exposing Wilson and his family to danger.

Therefore, she was "outed" by the White House as retaliation against Wilson for calling Bush a liar. Point No. 1 of liberals' conspiracy theory has been proved false since Britain's Butler Commission reviewed its government's pre-war intelligence on Iraq and concluded that "the British government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium."

It was again proved false when our own Senate Intelligence Committee also concluded, in July 2004, that Saddam Hussein had sought uranium from Niger.

So there went the White House's motive for muddying up Wilson: Government fact-finding commissions, here and in the United Kingdom, were muddying up Wilson on their own simply by finding facts.

Point No. 2, that Wilson's wife was an undercover agent, has been proved false even to the willfully blind since Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald announced the conclusion to his pointless investigation last year, saying that Plame's employment with the CIA was not undercover, but merely "classified."

Everything is "classified" at the CIA. They have no idea when 19 terrorists are about to hijack commercial aircraft and slaughter 3,000 Americans, but the CIA is very good at play-acting James Bond spy games.

How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame."

All this should have been enough to end conspiracy theories of White House skullduggery. But the nation's newsrooms simply continued asserting that someone in the Bush White House had "outed" Valerie Plame, despite the fact that revealing her employment with the CIA was not illegal.

Thus, as recently as January of this year, a New York Times editorial said the issue of the "leak" about Wilson's wife, whom the Times called "a covert CIA operative whose identity was leaked" (two strikes already), concerned "whether the White House was using this information in an attempt to silence Mrs. Wilson's husband, a critic of the Iraq invasion."

Wilson was more precise about the White House "leaker," variously naming Karl Rove, Lewis Libby and Dick Cheney as the source. He even described "a meeting in the suite of offices that the vice president occupies, chaired by either the vice president or Mr. Libby," where, Wilson said, the decision was made to destroy him.

(If the secret plan hatched in the vice president's office was to send evil spirits to enter Wilson's body and make him act like a fool, the plan worked brilliantly.)

Now it turns out, even point No. 3 of liberals' conspiracy theory was false: The original "leaker" of Plame's name to columnist Bob Novak -- not a crime -- was not in the White House at all. It was Richard Armitage, a State Department official and opponent of the Iraq war.

The information that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA had nothing to do with harming Wilson. It did not come from the White House. It did not even come from someone who supported the war in Iraq.

The rest of the world found out Armitage was Novak's source last week, something Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald knew from the first week of his investigation. So what was Fitzgerald investigating?

Even people who think the president should not be subject to civil suits in office do not deny that Bill Clinton had an affair with Monica Lewinsky and lied about it in a civil suit brought by Paula Jones. However irritating it is to liberals that lying about sex under oath is a crime, there was a crime that Ken Starr was investigating.

What was Fitzgerald investigating? Not only was there no underlying crime, there was not even -- as the Times put it -- "an attempt to silence Mrs. Wilson's husband" (or an attempt "to respond to people calling you a liar in the New York Times," as normal people put it).

Fitzgerald's entire investigation was nothing but a perjury trap from beginning to end for anyone who misremembered anything about who told whom what about a low-level nobody at the CIA who happened to be married to a Walter Mitty fantasist.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; cia; cialeak; coulter; joewilson; plame; spies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2006 3:54:02 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

What a great headline. For one the headline says it all.


2 posted on 09/06/2006 3:56:08 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

You beat me to it.


3 posted on 09/06/2006 3:56:40 PM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

It was no error on Joe and Val's part. They did everything they could to screw the Bush Administration. They had plenty of more-than-willing helpers.


4 posted on 09/06/2006 3:56:47 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Joe Wilson's amusingly titled book, "The Politics of Truth" (available on the $1 table in fine bookstores everywhere)

That's no exaggeration. I've seen it at used book sales for $2 and still no one would buy it.

5 posted on 09/06/2006 3:59:49 PM PDT by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Aussie Dasher

Thanks Ann Coulter. What did Joe Wilson's buttboy, Schmucky Schumer, know and when did he know it?


7 posted on 09/06/2006 4:00:24 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

When Ann doesn't have to rely on her biting wit to make a point....

must mean the facts are inflamatory enough on their own


8 posted on 09/06/2006 4:01:11 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Coulter ping.


9 posted on 09/06/2006 4:01:17 PM PDT by RobFromGa (The FairTax cult is like Scientology, but without the movie stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well, they weren't successful in destroying the administration, but they were able to set up a web site asking people to send them money. My guess is plenty of dems/libs are writing them checks.


10 posted on 09/06/2006 4:01:35 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Bumpitttt.


11 posted on 09/06/2006 4:01:42 PM PDT by Rocko ("'Fore you call me any dirty names, you better think twice." -- Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
What a great headline.

I concur.

12 posted on 09/06/2006 4:02:02 PM PDT by scott7278 (The War on Terror includes defending the homefront from the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I think Libby should sue the Wilsons, Armitage, Colin Powell, Fitzgerald, Novak, and a bunch of others for his troubles. He should be compensated for all of his legal bills and lost salary.
That investigation, and all of the press about it, is an outrage.


13 posted on 09/06/2006 4:03:11 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Quick and the dead 'round here, isn't it? :-)


14 posted on 09/06/2006 4:03:12 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Rulez.


15 posted on 09/06/2006 4:03:14 PM PDT by MrEdd (The easiest way to LIE with statistics is to use the average instead of the Median.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame."

lol!


16 posted on 09/06/2006 4:04:23 PM PDT by daku ("Behold this creature that walks like a man. It wants ketchup on its hot dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Aussie Dasher
How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame."

Egads..how dastardly clever..

18 posted on 09/06/2006 4:05:30 PM PDT by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I thought I couldn't read one more Plame/Wilson wrap-up, didn't need one, didn't care. I was wrong.

Ms. Coulter, I am a blind man having your columns read to me by a child. I understand people say you are somewhat attractive but that matters not at all to me. Will you marry me?
19 posted on 09/06/2006 4:06:21 PM PDT by SoCalRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daku

My favorite line, too. LOL!


20 posted on 09/06/2006 4:07:18 PM PDT by ShandaLear (So there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson