Posted on 08/29/2006 4:59:24 PM PDT by Jay777
From the NY Times we learn that once again the ACLU either doesn't care or doesn't have a brain when it comes to keeping the country safe. Whichever is the case they are actively undermining our security on a daily basis. This is just the latest example.
Federal authorities have prevented two relatives of a father and son convicted recently in a terrorism-related case from returning home to California from Pakistan unless they agree to be interviewed by the F.B.I.It is unclear whether the men, Muhammad Ismail, 45, and his son Jaber, 18, have a direct connection to the terrorism case or if they have been caught up in circumstance.
The United States attorney’s office in Sacramento declined Monday to answer questions about the Ismails beyond confirming that the men had not been permitted to fly into the United States and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation wanted to question them.
The United States attorney, McGregor W. Scott, reiterated a comment he had made to The San Francisco Chronicle, which reported Saturday about the Ismails’ troubles.
“They’ve been given the opportunity to meet with the F.B.I. over there and answer a few questions, and they’ve declined to do that,” Mr. Scott said through a spokeswoman, Mary Wenger.
The Ismails live in Lodi, Calif., a small farming town south of Sacramento, where their relatives Umer Hayat and his son, Hamid, were arrested last summer as part of what federal prosecutors said was an investigation into terrorist links.
(Excerpt) Read more at stoptheaclu.com ...
Ping!
They would demand an absentee ballot for bin laden.
Oh I don't want to stop the ACLU, I think we all should enjoy being entertained by such bunch of clueless lawyers. What is scary though, there is too many judges who take their arguments seriously.
What I couldn't fit in the article is that the self admitted terrorist cousin told the FBI that this cousin had also attended terror camps in Pakistan. That and the fact they just took a four year vacation to the area is quite a good reason to be a little cautious before letting them come back to the U.S.
Probably their Annual Convention..Who would be the
speakers at their Convention? You can list only one...
so make it a good one. My Choice is: Micheal Savage,
but don't know if he would escape alive.. Jake
ACLU our home town terrorist organization.
WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET THIS ORGANIZATION CHARGED UNDER THE SEDITION AND TREASON CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION?!!
Get it right....it is feckless crapweasels!!!
"the ACLU either doesn't care or doesn't have a brain when it comes to keeping the country safe."
It's not that they don't care or have a brain, or that they are naive and clueless. They know exactly what they are doing, and that is to destroy the USA as we know it. And they've succeeded to a great degree.
"Communism is the Goal."
Communist ACLU just wants Islam to do their dirty work for them. Little do they know the Commies will be next!
Who the heck died and left the ACLU in charge … demanding this, demanding that … sheeeese! I find this group more and more disgusting everyday. If they don’t like our system why don’t they go somewhere else, somewhere that might appreciate them.
I do not understand how this anti-American group has gained so much power and WHY IT IS ALLOWED TO OPERATE IN THIS COUNTRY. Ask your Congressman, ask your Senator, ask the President!
mostley arab lawyers
It seems to me that ANY and ALL members of the aclu(ess) should be considered to be members of an organization that harbors and supports terrorism.
FACT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.