Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man On Trial Attacks Own Lawyer
DavesDaily ^ | 07/19/06 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/21/2006 8:51:52 AM PDT by Froufrou

Attorney Mark Groettum was blindsided last week by an onslaught of punches from an unexpected foe -- the client he was defending in a Hibbing courtroom.

William Edwin Lehman Jr., 56, pummeled Groettum's face in front of the judge and jury, giving the lawyer a black eye and busted lip before courtroom security intervened.

Lehman, of Chisholm, was standing trial in St. Louis County District Court after being accused of stabbing two men in the apartment next door to his. Lehman had complained that the music they were playing was too loud, according to the criminal complaint.

The courtroom incident occurred after Lehman had made a motion -- when the jury was not present -- for a mistrial, saying his lawyer's counsel had not been effective. Judge James Florey denied Lehman's motion.

Groettum, 48, said his client requested a mistrial because Lehman claimed Groettum wouldn't ask witnesses questions Lehman wanted asked.

Florey ruled that the attack was an attempt to manipulate the system and that Lehman shouldn't be able to benefit from it. Another motion for a mistrial was denied.

The trial resumed Thursday with Lehman representing himself. On Friday, jurors found Lehman guilty of all six charges against him involving the attack on his Chisholm neighbors, St. Louis County prosecutor Brian Simonson said.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: agoodstart; humor
Talk about blind justice...
1 posted on 07/21/2006 8:51:52 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I have this humorous image in my mind of the judge denying the attorney's request to cancel his representation of the client.


2 posted on 07/21/2006 8:53:14 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Makes you wonder what the lawyer ever did to the judge...


3 posted on 07/21/2006 8:54:23 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

"Bill, listen, the trial is not going well. I'm going to request a mistrial, but the odds are not good that we'll get that. So, I have a backup plan. When I request the mistrial, if they turn me down, I want you to start hitting me. Now, ya gotta really give it to me. Blackeye, busted lip, the works. After that, I'll take another stab at requesting a mistrial, OK? That may not work either, but it's all I can think of."


4 posted on 07/21/2006 8:56:07 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("He hits me, he cries, he runs to the court and sues me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
The trial resumed Thursday with Lehman representing himself.

LOL..I can see him before the jury.."I know where you all live"...while his fists are flying in the air...

5 posted on 07/21/2006 8:58:39 AM PDT by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Sounds a little like 'Liar Liar', although in that movie Jim Carrey provides a self-infliceted a** kicking.


6 posted on 07/21/2006 9:00:47 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

My exact thought ... insanity plea, perhaps


7 posted on 07/21/2006 9:00:56 AM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"I have this humorous image in my mind of the judge denying the attorney's request to cancel his representation of the client."

I was forced to sue a building contractor about 10 years ago because he screwed up my house and refused to fix it.

It took 3 years to get the damn case into court because the guy kept changing lawyers. ( I think they were all telling him he would lose the case).

When the trial started his lawyer ask the judge to remove him from the case because he didn't want to represent the guy, the judge refused, told him he was stuck with it...lol

He had no defense prepared at all, the contractor lost big time, owed me over 100k at the end of the day.
8 posted on 07/21/2006 9:09:15 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; BerniesFriend

There very well could be some duplicity there.


9 posted on 07/21/2006 9:11:15 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
When the trial started his lawyer ask the judge to remove him from the case because he didn't want to represent the guy, the judge refused, told him he was stuck with it...lol

I've been told that, in criminal cases (but not this one, obviously), if the lawyer asks to be removed from the case it's a signal to the judge that the client is asking the lawyer to acquiece or engage in unethical behavior. Funny thing is that the judge usually denies the request, but the formality saves the lawyer's license from being yanked if something bad happens.

10 posted on 07/21/2006 9:15:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

This was a civil case, but the jury did find the contractor guilty of fraud.


11 posted on 07/21/2006 9:21:30 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
I feel for this guy, I'm currently dealing with several lawyers right now, (a civil matter), who are supposed to be on my side and I must admit, I'm starting to have fantasies of murder, torturous painful murder at that.
12 posted on 07/21/2006 9:38:44 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

BTDT. Best wishes to you.


13 posted on 07/21/2006 9:48:28 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
I love your tag line, and I'm appropriating that word.

Thanks!

14 posted on 07/21/2006 11:14:57 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

I have a whole list, Maybe someday someone will create a freeper dictionary, freeptionary?, and we could add some submissions to go along with "series", "hugh", "beeber", etc..


15 posted on 07/21/2006 11:20:05 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson