Posted on 07/13/2006 2:04:42 PM PDT by Paul Ross
Finally some straight talk on the Valerie Plame case, thanks to Robert Novak, the conservative columnist who first revealed the identity of the not-so-covert CIA officer three years ago.
Novak’s July 14, 2003, column on the much-disputed trip to Niger by Plame’s husband, former U.S. ambassador Joseph Wilson, triggered an FBI investigation, a federal grand jury, and eventually the appointment of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who indicted top White House aid Scooter Libby for perjury along the way.
At issue was whether Saddam Hussein ever sent a buying team to Niger looking for uranium yellowcake in the 1999-2000 period. After tea and crumpets with former friends in the Nigerian government, Wilson concluded that it never happened. At least, that’s what he says today.
(The definitive Senate Select Intelligence Committee report on pre-war intelligence on Iraq, released in November 2004, asserts unequivocally that Wilson lied in public about the conclusions he sent to the CIA about his Niger trip).
Despite all the sturm und drang over the past three years, Novak kept silent about who said what regarding Wilson’s trip. The Left has imputed all kinds of scurrilous motives to Novak’s silence. They have accused him of cutting a special deal with the special prosecutor. They have accused him of fingering Libby and Rove. They have accused him of total disregard of the First Amendment, preferring to violate the “sanctity” of anonymous sources in favor of going to jail.
They have compared unfavorably to former New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who went to jail instead of revealing her sources in the same case.
But when the Left realized that Judy Miller had been close to Scooter Libby and actually reported on the facts of Saddam Hussein’s weapons programs, rather than the creampuff version being put out by the anti-Bush crowd at the CIA, they dropped her instantly. She was fired by the NY Times almost the minute she was released from jail.
Fitzgerald finally has closed the leak case in so far as Novak is concerned. “That frees me to reveal my role in the federal inquiry that, at the request of Fitzgerald, I have kept secret,” Novak wrote yesterday in an account he published in Human Events.
“Joe Wilson's wife's role in instituting her husband's mission was revealed to me in the middle of a long interview with an official who I have previously said was not a political gunslinger,” Novak revealed. “After the federal investigation was announced, he told me through a third party that the disclosure was inadvertent on his part.”
The official who was Novak’s primary source did not even know the name of Wilson’s wife. But it wasn’t a very close-held secret. “I learned Valerie Plame's name from Joe Wilson's entry in ‘Who's Who in America,’” Novak wrote.
I have asked a number of former CIA clandestine operators about Valerie Plame.
One former senior clandestine officer scoffed at the claim that Valerie Plame had ever been truly covert. “How can you be [covert] when you are married to an ex-U.S. ambassador and work for the State Department overseas?” Somebody looking at her from a hostile power (say, Iran) would have to have a brain the size of a pea to miss her connection to the U.S. government, he added.
And yet, former CIA officers who vigorously oppose this administration have signed public letters and gone on network television to protest the exposure of her identity as the greatest national security breach of the century.
Larry Johnson, a former CIA officer who became a deputy director of the State Department’s counter-terrorism bureau, has launched an internet witchhunt against Karl Rove for allegedly “outing” his former Camp Perry classmate, Valerie Plame. (Gee, Larry: Guess everybody must have known about Val’s Camp Perry date with you, so it’s okay to talk about that, right?)
Novak’s column takes the wind out of their sails. Not only was Karl Rove not Novak’s primary source, but Valerie Plame’s role at CIA was so well-known that a CIA spokesman, Bill Harlowe, was able to confirm to Novak that Plame had suggested Wilson for the Niger trip.
Like Novak and hundreds of others of reporters, I have had dealings with Harlowe over the years. Even if you had nailed down the identity of a covert CIA operator who had worked for the agency 20 years earlier, Harlowe would never confirm that person’s existence. The standard line was to neither confirm nor deny.
But if you asked if so-and-so who was posted overseas to a U.S. embassy, and was now working as an analyst, could give you a background briefing on their subject of expertise, he would at least get back to you with a yes or a no.
And that is exactly what he provided to Novak. The CIA public affairs office was his third source.
Larry Johnson and others had kvetched that Novak blew Valerie Plame’s cover at her “top secret” CIA proprietary, Brewster Jennings, in Boston.They allege that Plame was working undercover as an energy industry analyst to penetrate Iranian nuclear procurement networks.
But guess what? It wasn’t Bob Novak who revealed that Valerie Plame may have been working undercover (with an alleged tie to the alleged Brewster Jennings in Boston, which now hosts an Internet game similar to “Where in the World is Carmen SanDiego”?)
It was left-wing columnist David Corn, writing in The Nation, just two days after Novak’s first column.
It turns out that Corn is a close friend of the Wilson/Plame couple, and knew all about their various foreign outings. Unlike Robert Novak, he didn’t need to consult “Who’s Who in America” to learn Valerie Plame’s name.
If any security breach occurred with the disclosure of Valerie Plame’s name, look toward Joe Wilson, who posted his wife’s name to “Who’s Who,” and to their circle of political and professional friends.
My hunch: it was all part of a carefully orchestrated public relations scheme, that netted lying Joe Wilson prime time television appearances, a best-selling book, and a $2.5 million contract for the memoirs of Madame.
Even worse than the lying Wilsons, Fitz is the guy who is really out on limb here in terms of credibility...
Nearly all the political commentators miss what this was really all about.
Novak's original article and others mentioned that Joe Wilson's visit actually bolstered the Bush administration's claim that Iraq was trying to purchase uranium.
Privately, Wilson admitted that Iraq WAS trying to buy uranium. Publicly, he lied.
The Bipartisan Senate Report about this matter so discredited Wilson that Kerry dropped him from his presidential campaign staff.
That report stated that Wilson had to actually bolstered the Bush administration's case about Iraq trying to buy uranium. Privately, Wilson confirmed what Bush said.
But publicly, Wilson told another story altogether.
Clearly, Wilson is a liar and the entire reason for this made up outrage about Valerie was to take away attention to the fact that Wilson was caught lying about a very important reason why we went to war in Iraq.
I hope we have CIA employees who are working this hard to overthrow the government in Iran.
Which was why they kept his "report" unwritten...and unrecorded apparently. Surprised they didn't try to erase their notes that confounded his later public contentions...
Expect yet another of Corn's "It wasn't me! I'm being victimized! Thank You God someone is reading me!" columns within a day.
Unlikely.
The new head of the CIA who replaced Porter Goss, who was trying to clean house, is rehiring one of the scum-sucking liberals...Steve Kappes...who covered for these guys.
I've never understood what the photographer was looking for with this picture. Are they trying to show that the happy little wilson home was thrown into disarray by the "outing" of valerie plame? to me it looks like valerie has a severe drinking problem and that joe is impotent to do anything about it but sit around and twiddle his thumbs. like, "honey, we have to talk about last night..."
Fitz's credibility is safe, because he is shielded by the the fact that he is harming a Republican. The Drive-by Media will write the story on him. He will be toasted along the beltway and in the salons of Europe. If his case against Libby is tried in D.C., he will even win a celebrated conviction. Fitz'z loss upon appeal will be a minor side note in the newspapers and network news, and Libby will be labeled as a convict and evidence of the Culture of Corruption.
Long term, however, history will not be kind to Fitz.
what is it with these staged photo sessions anyway? have we veered so far away from straight news that news producers think citizens can be swayed by drmatic photos ... what am i missing?
Coming up on Fox right in a minute or so is a discussion about this new Valerie Plame lawsuit against Cheney and Libby. Let's hear what The Judge has to say about it!
I don't have TV so give us a one- or two-line summing up if you can.
Wilson (CIA leaker and braggart):
"I will sue anyone and everyone for not stopping ME
from telling Novak, 'Who's who', the French Embassy,
and anyone else who might have been remotely interested
about my wife. They should have stopped me. And now
I need the money for her Armani dresses."
Then why did Plame list Brewster Jennings as her employer in her Democrat Party donation?
Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING
" Fitz's credibility is safe, because he is shielded by the the fact that he is harming a Republican. The Drive-by Media will write the story on him. He will be toasted along the beltway and in the salons of Europe. If his case against Libby is tried in D.C., he will even win a celebrated conviction. Fitz'z loss upon appeal will be a minor side note in the newspapers and network news, and Libby will be labeled as a convict and evidence of the Culture of Corruption."
Long term, however, history will not be kind to Fitz.
Unlike Ken Starr, he won't be taking pro bono liberal cases in the futile hope of earning the love of the american media.
Valerie (groggily): "Wow...I just...um...had this awful dream...that I was married to this nasty lying scumbag who was using me for his phoney political shenanigans to attack President Bush and suck up to John Kerry of all people....
"Hey wait a minute - that was no dream!"
Don't get me started on that helpless lamb. A tough prosecutor would have put pressure on Lewinsky to reveal the source of the talking points memo. The talking points memo was the key to exposing the Clinton strong arm tactics, and Starr didn't even pursue it.
ping
Haha, the first time I saw that photo I thought it was a still out of "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?".
Lewinski was only a sideshow that Starr blundered into. He should have left that alone and continued with the Whitewater case, in which they had indictable evidence. They would not have been able to get a conviction because of the politically charged atmosphere, which Starr himself was to blame for. He should have brought the hammer down at the earliest sign of tampering and challenges to his authority. Carville going on Sunday Talk shown threatening to break his knees should hae resulted in immediate charges against Carville and any other Clinton Operative.
Oh, you said something about don't get me started.
Not to mention that, by way of providing fodder for countless fundraising letters to the moonbat base, Joe and Val can expect to be invited to the best Rat parties from now to eternity.
I think it's just a hat-tip to the film noir genre---you know, the dark, dangerous, somewhat edgy world of spies.
I mean: "spies."
You got it!
And it wasn't "awful," from Val's perspective!
"That report stated that Wilson had to actually bolstered the Bush administration's case about Iraq trying to buy uranium. Privately, Wilson confirmed what Bush said."
You wouldn't have any choice lines from that report that you could post, do you? Or any direct quotes in the report of what Wilson said privately?
I've got a couple people I'd love to send such to.
Thanks.
I think you're right -- about plan b and all of it.
Here you go Paul:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/fiore/050717
Back up to links that Wilson lied about whether Iraq was trying to purchase uranium (they were).
hehehehe
Don't let liar Joe see that - he'll sue you.
After hearing on Brit Humme's program that Valerie Plame is suing Cheney, Rove and Libby, I'm wondering if there will be a counter suit. Obviously Plame's legal bills are gratis as this is nothing but legal extortion.
It's a cheap shot way of further crippling Rove and Libby financially until they say, "No mas." Cheney is the only one who can well afford the legal bills. I hope he'll be generous and get an ethical law firm to represent all three for the price of one(?).
I'd really, really, really like to see them nail that SOB.
I wish we could organize a freep campaign of Simon and Schuster and let them know they are buying the words of a proven liar.
They wouldn't be pleased to know that the Senate Bipartisan Intelligence Committee determined that what Joe Wilson discovered in Niger actually bolstered the Bush administration's position that Iraq was trying to purchase yellowcake. Wilson told the Congress in closed session one thing and then left those meetings and lied to the American public.
Lots of links to that and more here:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/fiore/050717
They miss it in both the micro and the macro. I have a few dozen questions, including, if Novak says the Feds knew his sources almost immediately (and that they had signed waivers), then who was Woodward's source? That would be the source who made his first appearance in front of Fitzgerald late last year.
That's 2 sources we know of that Fitzgerald all but gave a pass. And then there is Corn, who, as far as I can remember, was never called before the Grand Jury. Fitzgerald kept the investigation open for months and months, knowing almost immediately that no crime had been committed, looking only at the WH.
I don't think either of them were that smart. He wasn't working and she suggested he go to Niger for the money. When he got there he couldn't figure out what to do and came back. But he figured out later that he could use the trip as a propaganda campaign against Bush. Then, when her name was mentioned, they stumbled on this phony scandal giving him even more press attention.
This guy is a real idiot, and she isn't much smarter. I just don't buy the idea that they cooked all this up ahead of time.
No lefty will believe anything Robert Novak says, so I doubt this will end any of their speculation.
Exactly, there's that boozy Virginia Wolfe / Stepford Wives vibe to the photo---but the Rats don't even notice. They think it's wonderful.
Agree, completely.
This remark, and the earlier, "if the CIA worked half this hard to overthrow the iranians" comment, bring home the painful truth - that our premier foreign intelligence agency is infested with COWARDS who would sooner bring down our government (because they know nothing will happen to them, just the opposite; book deals and fame for speaking "truth to power"... author sidenote: how I HATE the way that phrase has been twisted by these leftist scum!)
Bingo! Covert my eye!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.