Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I do not mind Chinese vetoing the resolution. That will show China what it ultimately is, the enabler of N. Korea, even if China in fact has no love for N. Korea. It will show that China views N. Korea more as its leverage against U.S. than as a cancer growing on its butt.

Then there will be expanded sanctions on Chinese banking institutions as well as N. Korean overseas accounts. S. Korea may be also hit by this expanded financial sanction, unless it ceases all economic ties with N. Korea.

To get rid of Kim Jong-il regime, first its protective layer, made up of Chinese regime and S. Korean pinko goverment, should be stripped. We will hear stepped-up howling and screaming from various entities aiding and abetting N. Korean regime in the days ahead, with or witout passage of this security council resolution. I think we are going into the end game soon.

1 posted on 07/09/2006 4:01:40 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/09/2006 4:02:56 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"Then there will be expanded sanctions on Chinese banking institutions as well as N. Korean overseas accounts. S. Korea may be also hit by this expanded financial sanction, unless it ceases all economic ties with N. Korea."

Yeah, well, pass me that soju when you're done with it, you must have the good stuff.

The U.S. will never have the balls to sanction China again. If we didn't do shit when they shot down our plane, we sure won't do anything over them propping up a tinpot like Kim.


3 posted on 07/09/2006 4:14:02 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Foreign Minister Taro Aso expressed the view Sunday that Russia and China may abstain from a U.N. Security Council vote on a resolution calling for sanctions against North Korea over its missile launches, rather than exercising their veto powers.

Apparently the only think the U.N. is good for is that it allows one to properly identify some of their enemies. One Dummy. Two Ventriloquist. So far.

5 posted on 07/09/2006 4:42:35 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China should know we have an old American saying: Curb your dog.


7 posted on 07/09/2006 5:20:32 AM PDT by Graymatter ("Put only Americans on guard tonight." -- George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
S. Korea may be also hit by this expanded financial sanction,

Good. The Taiwan question has this element of it, too. Taiwanese limpwristers are not nearly as bad as their SoKo counterparts, but there is a large group in Taiwan that would give in to China the same way that the SK appeasers want to give in to Kimmy.

What amazes me is how Americans (esp Freepers) go nutz about WalMart, and then buy Hyundais, Samsung TVs and LG phones from a marginal "ally" like South Korea. Why not by French, too!?

9 posted on 07/09/2006 7:01:28 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

in Chins's view it's all about choosing the lesser of the two evils


12 posted on 07/09/2006 8:52:26 AM PDT by mfnorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The only thing that Russia and China get from backing North Korea is the pleasure of watching NK be a pain to the United States.

They certainly don't have any mutually beneficial economic relationship with NK. They don't need the ports.

In the end (when the "end" will be I don't know) it's all going to come down to a business decision: Do China and Russia benefit more from propping up a White Elephant like North Korea or do they pal up more (in an economic sense) to the West where everything they want and need is available?

It's a tide they know they cannot, nor particularly want to, turn back.


13 posted on 07/09/2006 9:01:17 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Going on record with this makes me wonder whether Japan hasn't communicated by back channels a threat to rescind Article 9, and possibly even declare itself as a nuclear weapons state, if they don't let the resolution pass. (The comment from the Defense Minster a while back about a decision for nuclear weapons on Monday sufficing for acquisition by Friday suggests that such a threat would not be vacuous.)


17 posted on 07/09/2006 8:11:00 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson