Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

"Then there will be expanded sanctions on Chinese banking institutions as well as N. Korean overseas accounts. S. Korea may be also hit by this expanded financial sanction, unless it ceases all economic ties with N. Korea."

Yeah, well, pass me that soju when you're done with it, you must have the good stuff.

The U.S. will never have the balls to sanction China again. If we didn't do shit when they shot down our plane, we sure won't do anything over them propping up a tinpot like Kim.


3 posted on 07/09/2006 4:14:02 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile
Re #3

I don't know. Time passes and things change. Financial institutions are weak spots of China, too, not just N. Korea. BDA of Macau was slapped with sanctions by U.S., whether China liked it or not at the time. U.S. can certainly target more Chinese banks.

Recently, some CFR types are advocating preemptive strikes to N. Korea, who are not Clintonoids. You would not imagine such a talk a few years ago. They are spouting only global free trade happy talk, and their theme has always been talk, negotiation, and appeasement.

4 posted on 07/09/2006 4:40:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianInExile
You are right about never placing sanctions on China. I wanted to punish the hell out of China for Tienanmen Square.

But now frankly we have partnered with the devil to such an extent that sanctions against them would be sanctions against ourselves.
14 posted on 07/09/2006 9:12:02 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson