1 posted on
04/30/2006 4:25:59 PM PDT by
DBeers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: DBeers
Danforth was always wishy-washy on some things but he's become a full-fledged liberal, it seems.
2 posted on
04/30/2006 4:29:20 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
To: DBeers
Do the majority of Episcopals even believe in the Bible anymore!?
Anyways, Danforth is a RINO, he was a RINO in the senate, and he hasn't worked a day in his life, he is spoiled, he comes from a rich family, and was rarely a practicing pastor, he was in elected office almost all of his life. I resent everyone like him.
To: DBeers
Log Cabin Republicans Ah yes. Christians who support traditional marriage are hurting the GOP, but butt-packers disguised as Republicans aren't.
To: DBeers
Opposition to "homosexual marriage" wins over more Democrats and Independents to the Republican cause that any other issue.
If we lose a few enemies from within as a result, that's a good thing.
5 posted on
04/30/2006 4:31:55 PM PDT by
FormerLib
("...the past ten years in Kosovo will be replayed here in what some call Aztlan.")
To: DBeers
I have to agree here, this is a state issue and should not be molested by the federal government like abortion was.
6 posted on
04/30/2006 4:32:28 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: DBeers
####Former Sen. John Danforth says a conservative push to ban gay marriage through a constitutional amendment is silly, calling it the latest example of how the political influence of evangelical Christians is hurting the GOP.####
Oh sure! It's political suicide for the GOP to back a proposal that has won every time it's been placed on a referendum ballot, always by at least a comfortable margin and usually by a huge margin. GOP support for traditional marriage must be the cause of the current low polling numbers for President Bush and the Republican congress. It surely has nothing to do with their embrace of amnesty for illegal aliens, an idea Danforth would not doubt endorse.
7 posted on
04/30/2006 4:32:54 PM PDT by
puroresu
(Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
To: DBeers
Danforth will get to be among the first in line explaining himself according to IIPeter 4:17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God???
To: DBeers
I've never heard of them, but is there a list of members of the Log Cabin Republicans?
9 posted on
04/30/2006 4:33:38 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: DBeers
Danforth is why I left Missouri
11 posted on
04/30/2006 4:35:15 PM PDT by
Pit1
To: DBeers
More mushy RINO crap.
What fire?
Where's Waco?
What's a few burned up women and children when someone has violated ATF regs?
13 posted on
04/30/2006 4:35:50 PM PDT by
wardaddy
(MALDEF and LULAC have infested this forum....as if RINOS weren't bad enough)
To: DBeers
I bet I know which mountain the log cabin is on.
16 posted on
04/30/2006 4:39:39 PM PDT by
badpacifist
(heavy sarcasm)
To: DBeers
John Danforth is practicing heresy when he says that. He must be pandering to the homosexuals because he has got to know better. Why would he want to mock marriage? Or does he not know what is going on here in this attempt to dissolve traditional marriage? He is playing into the Marxist playbook and our country slips into socialism.
17 posted on
04/30/2006 4:40:52 PM PDT by
olezip
To: DBeers
Danforth also supports embryonic stem cell research. His is an odd theology.
19 posted on
04/30/2006 4:41:42 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(God bless Tony Snow)
To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!
If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!
To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.
Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Danforth: Ban on Gay Marriage a Silly Idea
American Public: Gay Marriage a Silly Idea; Ban Rogue Judges from Legislating it from the Bench
20 posted on
04/30/2006 4:42:12 PM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: DBeers
Danforth you nitwit...this is fundamental to who we are as a people.
21 posted on
04/30/2006 4:46:21 PM PDT by
Drango
(No electrons were harmed in this posting. Several however, were inconvenienced.)
To: DBeers
Genuine issues facing the US, US Security, US Sovereignty, Energy Independence, Securing the Borders, Drilling ANWR, Drilling off of Florida, Drilling off of California, Alternative Fuels, Windmills, Nuclear Plants, Excessive Taxation etc etc etc and this CLOWN attaches his name to Gay Marriage!
Question.... is this Selective Media Reporting or is it a Selective Political Endorsement?
Leadership usually means "not" having to guess!
TT
To: DBeers
But Danforth said he is opposed. "The basic concept of the Republican Party is to interpret the Constitution narrowly, not expansively, so that legislatures, and especially state legislatures, can work out over a period of time the social issues in our country," he said.I don't know what rock he just crawled out from under but the whole reason this amendment is necessary is for the judges, not the people. In fact the amendment does precisely what Danforth says he favors: It returns the issue to state legislatures. If we are going to allow some states to redefine marriage and other states to not redefine it (an impossiblilty I think), then we are going to have to call these things by different names. That's why marriage is the word for the definition held throughout history, and "civil union" is the term for the new progressive definition. If states want that, then let their legislators who must be reelected by the people vote for it. Ultimately, the way our Constitution reads, there is no real way to allow one state to have it without forcing another state to recognize it. The DOMA supposedly protects other states. But it does nothing to protect us from the judges, who will overturn DOMA first chance they get.
25 posted on
04/30/2006 4:54:19 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: DBeers
Wonder if he thinks laws against having sex with animals are silly.
27 posted on
04/30/2006 4:58:10 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: DBeers
We have more rules on what constitutes a new mattress than we have have on what constitutes one's gayness; I think we need to suspend the process until we have a definition.
31 posted on
04/30/2006 5:01:40 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: DBeers
Its silly to defend traditional values but its reasonable to promote the liberal agenda. Now I get it.
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
33 posted on
04/30/2006 5:03:20 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson