Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Face-saving Dubai Deal in the Works? (Frist Barf Alert)
Time ^ | 02/25/06 | TIMOTHY J. BURGER, MIKE ALLEN AND MATTHEW COOPER

Posted on 02/26/2006 4:14:04 AM PST by peyton randolph

Moving toward a deal that could allow President Bush and congressional GOP leaders to save face and avert a prolonged confrontation, GOP officials said today that they were discussing the idea of having Dubai Ports World seek a new review of its acquisition of a British company's operation that runs several key U.S. ports.

-snip- 

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; dubai; frist; msmspin; ports; trop; uae; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
This has Frist for President spin written all over it.
1 posted on 02/26/2006 4:14:07 AM PST by peyton randolph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
BS. Face saving for the Repbo Congress critters who fell all over themselves to freak out about the Senate Democrat-Unions Port PR ploy. Just like the Patriot Act, they will mug for the cameras and then accept the deal just as President Bush purposed it. What a bunch of idiots are the current crop Republican Congresscritters. Amazing how they even got elected as utterly PR stupid as they all are.
2 posted on 02/26/2006 4:17:43 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Reading the last paragraphs of the article, it is clear that this was leaked by Frist's office to make him look good on foreign policy and national security, areas in which he has absolutely no experience.

The Frist-Saves-The-Day spin is why I included the Frist Barf Alert. It is a very lame attempt to show that he is more adept at the War on Terror than the sitting president.


3 posted on 02/26/2006 4:23:23 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

NO yesterday. NO today. NO tomorrow. What part don't they understand?


4 posted on 02/26/2006 4:25:25 AM PST by Rapscallion (Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion
NO yesterday. NO today. NO tomorrow.

There's an article at The New Republic (linked at RealClear Politics) by John Judis that makes the case that the port deal has Bush support because Dubai pulled Boeing's @ss out of the fire with a very large order for planes last year. 

I've linked to it above...but for some reason the link is not working right now.

 

5 posted on 02/26/2006 4:34:28 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Face-saving for Congress critters in general, I'm afraid. For critters from both parties. 43's being merciful. Again. Sigh.
6 posted on 02/26/2006 4:37:12 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
FWIW


For further information purposes ...


The CFIUS Process And The DP World Transaction

From The U.S. Department of State

Fact Sheet

White House Office of the Press Secretary






7 posted on 02/26/2006 4:45:05 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Thanks for the link. If the Dubai deal gets killed, we should insist that the Chicoms lose their ports sold to them for Clinton campaign contributions.


8 posted on 02/26/2006 4:48:19 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

It has Democrat spelled all over front of it.Why does it say save face for the GOP. The Democrats started the ranting and raving and of course the Republicans jumped in. It seems to me neither side of the isle does their job beforehand and they all are just politicking. I still dont like the deal but lets not forget back in 1999 a lot of these Senators stood by when Clinton turned the Panama Canal over to the Chinese.They stood by as Clinton gave the Chinese all the computer technology and encryption they need to pit America in their cross hairs. We in America do not have leaders,we have kings,queens and stars. None of them spend a huge amount of time doing their homework nor do their Billion dollar staffs. They are like the Hollywood crowd seeking the cameras.Like Alan Simpson said,"confusion,crap and controversy" and all the while it is their own selfish ass they are looking out for while America burns. With this kind of leadership America is doomed.


9 posted on 02/26/2006 5:08:33 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

"Frist for President" -- the younger generation should pay attention: Bill Frist is a walking, talking example of what NOT TO DO if you have aspirations of running for president.


10 posted on 02/26/2006 5:10:13 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
"If the Dubai deal gets killed, we should insist that the Chicoms lose their ports sold to them for Clinton campaign contributions."


This "deal" was out in the open and above board.

"The announcement of DP World's bid for P&O was made in November 2005, and the news was widely reported in the press and international financial trade publications. "


Schumer's political posturing, along with the weak-in-the-knees (head?) Rino's, though expected, is pathetic.

Even more pathetic is the thinking [?] of the American public, that we are now a democracy, and no longer a representative republic.

People that haven't a clue (I am addmittedly one) about ports, how they are operated and by whom, have become stampeeded into believing we are being sold down the proverbial river by President Bush.


While I understand he (GWB) is a "lame duck", that there are those (like Frist) that wish to upstage him for political profit, and the enemy Democrat Party will do anything to bring him and the country down, this has become insane.


To watch the usual suspects, here on Free Republic, wail and castigate, while expected, has become obscene.

These same detractors would undoubtably pee their pants should they even get in close proximity to a longshoreman, never mind having an ability to understand the workings of CFIUS.






11 posted on 02/26/2006 5:14:18 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

We don't have to act desperate about this port deal. Too many here are jumping fearing we won't be liked. There's much about the UAE that's not understood. As to who needs who the most?
The UAE isn't a charitable organization that's giving us the right to dock there for free. We pay them. But that's not why were important to them. We're important because if we weren't there the Iranians would swoop over and take their oil fields. And if we said "dock our ships for free or we're pulling out, they would dock our ships for free. Now, the relationship is equal. When the war is over, it will be unequal in our favor.

My suggestion to the scardy cats who are afraid the UAE won't like them? They should stop acting so desperate. It's not attractive.


12 posted on 02/26/2006 5:17:47 AM PST by GOPJ (Hollywood has jumped the shark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph; All

It's a shame that we come to the realization... we've totally sold our country out. All the work of the past shipping magnates is decades gone... and we can't do it ourselves.

I have a question or two.

What would happen (or what other staging areas do we have for the WOT), if because of the uproar Dubai wouldn't stage our fighter planes and military equipment anymore?
Whether this deal is blackmail, tit-fo-tat or whatever, where would that put the WOT? I know they are protected by us being there but have too much access to our military equipment. Why didn't anyone scream about that these past years?

Also, would P&O (if the buyout of terminals deal didn't work), be obligated to finish their contract?

Who else on the list of bidders can do it?

I know China wouldn't touch it and I don't know about Singapore.


13 posted on 02/26/2006 5:20:34 AM PST by AliVeritas (Vlad Crusade Crew... Radicals please come to NY to protest. Will travel, have bond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Frist is working feverishly to guarantee a Dem Senate come November.
14 posted on 02/26/2006 5:20:59 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

re: Chicoms

Exactly


15 posted on 02/26/2006 5:21:03 AM PST by AliVeritas (Vlad Crusade Crew... Radicals please come to NY to protest. Will travel, have bond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah

Well said!!


16 posted on 02/26/2006 5:33:13 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't! --FReeper airborne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

If the deal was good enough for clintoon and china, what has changed?


17 posted on 02/26/2006 5:45:45 AM PST by hotshotpilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hotshotpilot

Exactly! A British company is acquired by a UAE company and all hell breaks loose. Stop the Arabs, visions of mosques at our our ports, secret deals, etc...

The paranoia is just unbelievable.


18 posted on 02/26/2006 5:50:29 AM PST by baltoga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

I don't like being blackmailed.


19 posted on 02/26/2006 6:05:07 AM PST by i_dont_chat (I defend the right to offend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

FYI, Andrew Wilkow's on at 10 on WABC radio, thought you might be interested to hear his take on the ports... people waited all week to hear it.

Thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1585833/posts

Station Link (in case you're on the Sunday shows or another thread:
http:/www.wabcradio.com


20 posted on 02/26/2006 7:07:21 AM PST by AliVeritas (Vlad Crusade Crew... Radicals please come to NY to protest. Will travel, have bond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson