Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ariz. Court Orders Lawmaker Out of Office
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/27/06 | Pal Davenport - ap

Posted on 01/27/2006 1:31:25 PM PST by NormsRevenge

PHOENIX - An Arizona legislator has been removed from office for overspending during his 2004 primary race, making him the first lawmaker in the country to be ousted for violating a state's public campaign financing system.

After a five-month court battle, the Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday ordered first-term Republican Rep. David Burnell Smith to leave office at midnight.

"I will no longer exercise any duties as a representative," the 64-year-old lawyer said Friday.

Under Arizon's 1998 Clean Elections Law, candidates who voluntarily participate must collect a set number of $5 contributions from voters to qualify for public funding. In return, they must adhere to certain spending limits.

The state Citizens Clean Elections Commission ruled in August that Smith exceeded his nearly $25,000 primary spending limit by about $6,000.

Smith had initially acknowledged spending too much because of sloppiness but later said that he did not overspend and that his records merely were in disarray.

Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico and North Carolina have similar public campaign finance systems.

___

On the Net:

Citizens Clean Elections Commission: http://www.ccec.state.az.us


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: ariz; cleanelections; court; lawmaker; orders; outofoffice

1 posted on 01/27/2006 1:31:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Odd... separation of powers usually requires the legislative body to impose such a penalty.


2 posted on 01/27/2006 1:35:09 PM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So now we have a Court deciding who can and cannot be a legislator? Most state constitutions model the US Constitution and give sole discretion as to who to set or not seat in the legislature.


3 posted on 01/27/2006 1:35:23 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

... or the voters...


4 posted on 01/27/2006 1:36:33 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

IOW nobody accept public funding and they can't touch you.


5 posted on 01/27/2006 1:40:16 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Under Arizon's 1998 Clean Elections Law, candidates who voluntarily participate...."

Maybe he should have opted out.

6 posted on 01/27/2006 1:41:14 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

he needs therapy. he's clearly addicted.


7 posted on 01/27/2006 2:03:38 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What a strange law.

Since the people voted him in, isn't it up to the people to remove him...either by recall now or voting booth later?


8 posted on 01/27/2006 2:45:23 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
So now we have a Court deciding who can and cannot be a legislator?

Constitution? We ABOLISAHED that antiquated document! WE are your MASTERS...WE decide what is "Law"!

9 posted on 01/27/2006 3:31:47 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
10 posted on 01/29/2006 5:56:03 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

We have to start somewhere with the illegal contributions. This is a great start now if all 50 states could clean up their acts. We would have a perfect election process.


11 posted on 01/29/2006 6:03:28 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Early on a Sunday morning, you should probably post a sarcasm tag.


12 posted on 01/29/2006 6:09:40 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iPod Shuffle
"Odd... separation of powers usually requires the legislative body to impose such a penalty."

The legislative body did so by enacting the legislation.
13 posted on 01/29/2006 9:56:17 AM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Since the people voted him in, isn't it up to the people to remove him...either by recall now or voting booth later?

I'm not really in favor of the law, but the "people" did remove him. The people elected the state legislature which in turn created the legislation.

This is actually a case of the courts applying the law rather than making it up. The only question would be if the court accurately tallied up his spending.

14 posted on 01/29/2006 10:16:27 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Your right. I forgot just kidding at the end.


15 posted on 01/29/2006 11:31:58 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson