Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/24/2005 8:25:40 AM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ncountylee
""We're seeing clearly now that [President] Bush thought 9/11 gave him license to act like a dictator," wrote Newsweek's Jonathan Alter.

Newsweek should be forced to put a donkey on their cover. First to show that they are the communications arm of the Democrat party and second to show that most of their writers and editors are jackasses.

2 posted on 12/24/2005 8:29:52 AM PST by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Alberto "What's Immigration Law?" Gonzales won't have the stones to do what is right, so don't get your hopes up. We will continue to bear this endless stream of left-wing treason until a US city gets nuked.


3 posted on 12/24/2005 8:30:26 AM PST by thoughtomator (Congrats Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

The author is absolutely right.

All those involved in revealing this information should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Revealing national security information is a felony.

I also read, that President Bush met with the Chief editor and other high level of executives of the NYT, imploring them to NOT publish this information, because of its impact on National Security, and they did it anyway.

They should all be tried for treason.


4 posted on 12/24/2005 8:30:35 AM PST by FairOpinion (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

In a real war, these traitor/saboteurs could be dealt with appropriately.


6 posted on 12/24/2005 8:31:42 AM PST by Lexington Green (JOURNALIST - What a propagandist calls himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

A good start would be to subpoena the reporters and editors concerned and jail them until they reveal their sources.

The sources should be fired and tried for violating the oaths they took when they got their security clearances.

I doubt whether it's practicable to try anyone for treason at this point, but they can still lose their jobs and spend a few years in jail for breaking the law.

This article makes exactly the point I have been making. The entire press has been saying that people must be punished for the minor crime of leaking about Plame. Or perhaps no crime at all, since she was outed many years before, and didn't have the right job description to make it a crime to reveal it.

Now that a major crime has been committed, it should be punished. If the administration fails to do it, they will as good as say that they will not enforce our secrecy laws. These leakers are not stupid. They see repeatedly that they can get away with it without any consequences, so they will continue to do it.

For the sake of our country's security if not to protect the administration from more similar attacks, Bush must act. It is his duty to do so, and there has never been a better time.


10 posted on 12/24/2005 8:38:11 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I think a firing squad would fix the leak problem right up.


12 posted on 12/24/2005 8:47:30 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

While President Bush is Protecting America, the DNC is Protecting Al Queda!

The Risen and Leaktbaugh should answer two questions: Cigarette? Blindfold?

Merry Christmas to Our Victorious Troops


17 posted on 12/24/2005 9:16:07 AM PST by bray (Merry Christmas Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
The more they harp on this, the more the media will boost the president's poll numbers. The story broke last week, and his approval rating hit 50% at Rasmussen.

Americans - even the majority who do not use blogs or other web news and opinion sources as part of their current events information - will eventually understand the reality of Article II of the Constitution. They will understand the presidential duty to defend the nation by gathering foreign intelligence even if it involves citizens. They will learn about Carter, Reagan, and Clinton and how those presidents tapped communications links and how Clinton even broke into a citizen's residence to seize documents and other proof of spying, without a warrant!

Congress has approval ratings half that of the president (heh!). People do not want Congress to control foreign affairs (it's too slow and leaky) and will resent its interference in the Constituionally-mandated duties of the president. The more vocal Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi become, the more the citizens will realize their criticisms are not made to protect our rights. More and more Americans will see that Democrats simply want to gain power and are willing to do anything to get it, even weakening the country and exposing it to more attacks!

Another Rovian Storm, swamping the contemporary liberal-leftist dinghy of the Democrat Party. Yes.

18 posted on 12/24/2005 9:18:11 AM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I am about ready to hand over national security to the NYT since they are sooo good at it.--with the provision that a with every terrorist attack, another employee with the times be electrocuted, starting at the top with the head loonies.


19 posted on 12/24/2005 9:24:47 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

A hypothetical for you. Imagine there has been wrongdoing by people in power in this country, imagine there are witnesses to that crime who wish to report it to the FBI. The wrongdoers, having knowledge of this, proceed to call out the agency under discussion and interecept their communications, all in the name of national security. Smacks of tyrany to me. Lest we forget Richard Nixon.


29 posted on 12/25/2005 4:40:42 PM PST by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Until someone is brought up on charges of treason, the leaks will never cease.


36 posted on 12/27/2005 4:51:44 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
Where in the heck are the subpoenas for James Risen and Eric Lichtblau. Where is the JD. Why so long! Is this another blow over?
41 posted on 01/05/2006 6:41:36 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson