Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ncountylee

The author is absolutely right.

All those involved in revealing this information should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Revealing national security information is a felony.

I also read, that President Bush met with the Chief editor and other high level of executives of the NYT, imploring them to NOT publish this information, because of its impact on National Security, and they did it anyway.

They should all be tried for treason.


4 posted on 12/24/2005 8:30:35 AM PST by FairOpinion (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
I also read, that President Bush met with the Chief editor and other high level of executives of the NYT, imploring them to NOT publish this information, because of its impact on National Security, and they did it anyway.

They did it anyway because they have only one agenda - the deposing of President Bush before his term is over. We are going to hear a constant increase in the MSM about impeachment until by late summer '06 it will be so shrill you will not be able to turn on your TV let alone read a newspaper. The RATS are going to run advertisement stating "Here is our articles of impeachment - vote DEMONRAT for the house and we promise you impeachment" Mark my words the stage is being set, MSM is a major player and the NYT cares much more about restoring DEMONRAT power than they do about the safety of America. Hope the next islamofacist plane plows into the NYT building.

28 posted on 12/24/2005 3:52:03 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson