Posted on 11/30/2005 4:34:14 PM PST by smoothsailing
Republicans Are Cowards for Not Defending Rep. Jean Schmidt
Posted Nov 30, 2005
by Ann Coulter
When Democratic Rep. John Murtha called for the withdrawal of American troops in the middle of the war, Republicans immediately leapt to action by calling Murtha a war hero, a patriot and a great American.
I haven't heard Republicans issue this many encomiums to one man since Ronald Reagan died. By now, Murtha has been transformed into the greatest warrior since Alexander the Great and is probably dating Jennifer Aniston.
In response to Murtha's demand for the "immediate withdrawal of American troops" -- as the New York Times put it -- President Bush called Murtha a "fine man, a good man" who served with "honor and distinction," who "is a strong supporter of the United States military." He said he knew Murtha's "decision to call for an immediate withdrawal of our troops ... was done in a careful and thoughtful way."
Vice President Dick Cheney called Murtha "a good man, a Marine, a patriot."
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Murtha is "a fine man, I know him personally ... and it's perfectly proper to have a debate over these things, and have a public debate."
National Security Adviser Steve Hadley called in his praise for Murtha from South Korea, saying Murtha was "a veteran, a veteran congressman and a great leader in the Congress."
During the House debate on Murtha's insane proposal to withdraw troops in the middle of the war, Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., said Murtha deserved an "A-plus as a truly great American," and Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., said "none of us should think of questioning his motives or desires for American troops."
On the House floor, both Republicans and Democrats repeatedly gave Murtha rousing standing ovations. There was so much praise for Murtha that one of his Democratic colleagues asked him if he still had to attend Murtha's funeral.
What is this? Special Olympics for the Democrats? Can't Republicans disagree with a Democrat who demands that the U.S. surrender in the middle of a war without erecting monuments to him first? What would happen if a Democrat were to propose restoring Saddam Hussein to power? Is that Medal of Freedom territory?
I don't know what Republicans imagine they're getting out of all this love they keep throwing at Democrats. I've never heard a single liberal preface attacks on Oliver North with a recitation of North's magnificent service as a Marine. And unlike Murtha, who refuses to release his medical records showing he was entitled to his two Purple Hearts, we know what North did. (These Democrat military veterans are hardly shrinking violets when it comes to citing their medals, but they get awfully squeamish when pressed for details.)
We also know what Rep. Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., did to earn his medals. One of only two American Navy aces that the Vietnam War produced, Cunningham shot down five MiGs, three in one day, including a North Vietnamese pilot with 13 American kills. Cunningham never did something as insane as proposing that we withdraw troops in the middle of a war, but this week he did admit to taking bribes. And yet, no Democrat breathed a word of Cunningham's unquestioned heroism before rushing to denounce him as "the latest example of the culture of corruption" -- in the words of Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
Sen. Teddy Kennedy didn't issue a 20-minute soliloquy on what a wonderful man Judge Robert Bork was as a human being before attacking his judicial philosophy. Kennedy just laid into Bork like he was George Lincoln Rockwell. Speaking of which, George Lincoln Rockwell, former head of the American Nazi Party, served in the military during World War II. Are we obligated to praise his war service before disputing his views?
CNN's Bill Schneider summarized the Republican love-fest for Murtha by saying that House Republicans "started calling him some very ugly names -- cowardly, shameful, he wanted to cut and run, he wanted to surrender to the terrorists, emboldening the enemy." Are we all looking at the same "intelligence"?
The only Republican congressman who did not offer to have sex with John Murtha on the House floor was Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio. While debating Murtha's own proposal to withdraw American troops from Iraq in the middle of a war waged to depose a monstrous dictator who posed a threat to American national security, Schmidt made the indisputably true remark that Marines don't cut and run. (She was right! Murtha voted against his own proposal.)
Schmidt's precise words were: "I received a call from Col. Danny Bubp. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message, that cowards cut and run, Marines never do." Bubp later said -- pointlessly -- that he was not calling Murtha a coward. Neither was Jean Schmidt. (These guys are very brave facing down the VC, but cower before the MSM.)
Now Schmidt is Emmanuel Goldstein, subjected to the liberals' Orwellian two-minutes hate, and not one Republican will defend her. If Republicans were one-tenth as rough with the congressman who wants to withdraw troops in the middle of a war as they are on a congresswoman who calls it cowardly to withdraw troops in the middle of a war, we might have a functioning Republican Party.
Hey, I defended her... I even sent her money as a direct reaction to the NYSlimes hit piece.
I stood up and applauded her.
She deserves support. Ant when you say 'republicans', do you mean GOP congressmen and senators only? Don't the little people, the commoner republicans on the street, count?
Annie, you seem like a nice girl, but if you haven't figured this out yet, then you're not as smart as I thought you were.
My Congressman supported her -- guess he doesn't count either in Ann's world.
I agree and ... we were just discussin that today on our way home. We said she should NOT have apologize because she was just relaying a message from a Marine who called her. She said that HE said..."Cowards cut and run...Marines never do."
That was his message and she saw to it that it was delivered. What the Marine said was true and she said it exactly as he said it.
If Murtha wanted to take it personally that's his business. But...She didn't say HE was a coward. She said what the Marine told her to relay and that was again: "Cowards cut and run...Marines never do."
As my mother always said: "If the shoe fits...wear it."
Therefore, she did not say anything out of line. I thought she did fine. It's always free speech when it comes out of the mouths of the left/lib/dems but when someone else speaks their mind the left/lib/dems want them fired or demand apologies.
She did nothing wrong. I commend her for relaying such a powerful message and I thank the Marine for his truthfulness and courage.
Ouch!
Its the painful truth
What is she talking about?! I didn't see widespread GOP condemnation of Rep. Schmidt or a GOP rush to kiss Murtha's feet.
Generally, as for politicians, Democrats are street fighters, Republicans are scardy cats.
Retract "GOP feet kissing". Mea Culpa.
Coulter is talking about the rush to kiss Murtha's feet (which she documents) and the GOP leaving Schmidt to flap in the wind.
Coulter and Schmidt are chickenhawks. Smart Republicans backed off when they realized that Murtha had plenty of military contacts and was not an army of one.
A lot of us defended Jean.I don't remember anyone praising Murtha.The best that was said about him that I read here,IIRC, was that he was an old fool.That was about as good as it go for Jihad Jack.
Coulter is apparently only talking about D.C.pubbies, not freeper pubbies.
Ah, yes I've learned all about "D.C. pubbies". I have a pet name for them: "Democrats".
Yaaawwwnnn, nothing new here.... move along.
Noted and retracted. Sorry. I was surprised by her assertions because I didn't hear a thing in the ether, even on FR. I didn't see widespread GOP praise and I thought when Coulter said "not defending" I assumed the GOP was actually attacking her, not just not defending her from the Dems.
Bubp also later said that he never asked Schmidt to send Murtha a message. IOW, Schmidt played fast and loose with Bubp's communication.
This was not a helpful thing for Schmidt to do, and it will likely cost her her seat next year.
Coulter, meanwhile, is her same nasty self in another nasty column.
Nasty is a good word to describe her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.