My heart bleeds...
Posted on 11/03/2005 3:15:36 PM PST by Pokey78
THE PRINCE OF WALES and his new bride have taken America by storm this week. Across the nation, a frenzy of monarcho-mania has once again swept this great republic. Office workers clasping DVDs of the royal wedding in April have been hanging out of high-rise windows trying to catch a glimpse of the Prince’s motorcade as it sweeps triumphantly through city streets. Special souvenir copies of The Wall Street Journal with cut-out-and-keep guides to the couple’s couture have been flying off newsstands. Hairdressers are reporting a sudden surge in demand from middle-aged women for a new style — Camilla bangs. In rowdy classrooms from New York to San Francisco happy schoolchildren have been singing songs of affection for the old country and its future king and queen. All right, I made all that up. There was no special Wall Street Journal. The royal couple didn’t even make the cover of People magazine. Camilla’s hair remains, as far as I am able to tell, frowsily unemulated. Office workers, schoolchildren and teachers went about their daily life undisturbed by the royal tourists. The truth is that this has been one of the most anonymous royal trips that I can recall. It’s the first official visit by the heir to the throne in two decades, but a poll in USA Today found 81 per cent of Americans expressed no interest whatsoever in the event. The good news, then, for the royals is that their worst fears, that an America still in thrall to the Diana cult, would rise up in the spirit of 1776 and throw the monarchical chump out of the country, have not been realised. The bad news is that this is probably because nobody has noticed he’s here. Not since the third Adam and the Ants comeback tour has so much energy been expended by so many to so little attention. The Prince and the Duchess have proceeded ceremoniously from one event to the next like harlequins at a convention for the colour-blind. The papers and the nightly news have reported the visit, but it has generally ranked below items about the baby giant panda’s first steps at the National Zoo and yet another shake-up at CNN. Even David Blunkett got more attention in the news pages of The Washington Post yesterday than did Charles and Camilla’s arrival in the capital. There was one brief moment of excitement during the “social dinner” (not a state dinner, be sure to note) at the White House on Wednesday. Inside, in the East Room, some of Washington’s finest C-list guests — including luminaries, the White House press release told us, such as James C. Langdon Jr, attorney with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld LLP — dozed through a dinner of celery broth and medallions of buffalo. Outside, a large crowd with placards had gathered in Lafayette Park across the street. Who were they? Members of the Northern Virginia chapter of the “Diana is our only Queen” sect, ready to throw tampons at the Prince’s car? Angry producers of genetically modified crops fed up with being lectured by Charles about the virtues of organic farming?The original members of the neoconservative cabal, perhaps, upset that the Prince might be inside trying to persuade President Bush of the virtues of multiculturalism and being nice to Muslims? It turned out that they were a group of Ethiopian immigrants and refugees urging Mr Bush to intervene in their country after some dodgy elections there at the weekend. They didn’t know there was a big dinner going on, still less that there was a royal couple in the house. It sums up the trip really; you can see the T-shirt already: I went to Washington and all I got was this lousy demonstration about Africa. The Prince’s media handlers are apparently troubled by the inconspicuousness of their master’s presence on America’s national stage. The whole idea of the trip after all was to resell Prince Charles to Americans, to de-demonise Camilla, adulteress and tiara-stealer in the eyes of a deeply moralistic nation, to banish forever the memory of Diana being twirled around the dance floor by John Travolta. But almost every comment I have heard or read about the trip has included something along the lines of: “Dear me, it’s not as exciting as when Diana was being twirled around the dance floor by John Travolta, is it?” Worse still for the Prince, he’s come at a time when it’s suddenly become hip to be dull, and yet he still can’t cut it. Prince Charles hasn’t been competing for news coverage with glamorous princesses. He’s been sidelined by a sudden flurry of grey-suited fiftysomething men of anti-cult status: Scooter Libby, a hitherto anonymous assistant to Vice-President Dick Cheney, now in trouble for apparently lying to a grand jury about a crime that never was; Ben Bernanke, a hitherto anonymous economist just appointed to run the Federal Reserve; and Samuel Alito, a hitherto anonymous judge from Philadelphia whom Mr Bush has just nominated to the Supreme Court. And yet the Prince and his courtiers should not be downhearted. That he is being ignored is an encouraging sign. It means that Americans, like the Prince himself, have finally grown up. All those years of Diana mania, all that breathless media coverage of the royal marital chaos seem so 1990s. In an America still hung over from all that excess, it’s reassuring to be able to pay no attention to a Prince who is just a harmless old bore with slightly batty ideas and a dowdy wife. Indeed Americans should be grateful to Prince Charles for doing his little bit to erode the cult of celebrity in this celebrity-obsessed nation. And we should enjoy the sheer finger-gnawing tedium of it all while it lasts. There are rumours that Prince William may be coming to America next year. The slump in the souvenir-mug making business will soon be at an end.
Who?
My heart bleeds...
We have mnore important things on our mind right now...
...no offense to the royals and all that.
I'll bet if Charles had been a little more pro-America of late someone might have given a crap that he was here. This Brit sounds pissy for being irrelevant.
He's a fop. A pampered fop.
He is a fine man, no doubt, but there is nothing American about him.
Yep...he surely is...
Oh...he's here.
I thought he was leading the misunderstood Muslims in Paris.
Meh.
"...Samuel Alito, a hitherto anonymous judge from Philadelphia."
"...this celebrity-obsessed nation."
The author of this article is a total moron.
This Brit sounds pissy for being irrelevant…
Sorry that British sensibilities were offended. Really.
I can’t believe you two read the same article I just read. I thought it was very funny.
The author was absolutely relishing the fact that we’re ignoring the royals. He wasn’t pissy or offeneded. He was heartened.
Take a look at my post, above.
Which of those three quotes you highlighted do you consider inaccurate?
Welcome to the US, Bonnie Prince Charlie. If you're ever in Texas, stop in, and I'll feed you a dinner of stewed squirrel and braised mustard greens, with oven roasted new potatoes.
Ok. I noticed. I even invited him to dinner. Can they stop whining now?
/john
Charles is needed in France asap.
Drudge had the menu for last night's social dinner posted on his website. I thought it sounded pretty tasty.
And they weren't all nonentities by any means. Jenna Bush was there.
A foppish git.
some of Washington's finest C-list guests
That's all that D.C. has to offer, in my opinion.
... a dinner of celery broth and medallions of buffalo.
Oh, yummy!
Is it true if Chuck flaps his ears he can fly????
That is just about as stupid lookin' a mofo there is.
I thought the ole chap was spot on, too! Some people just don't know how to have a good chuckle these days!
tina brown of the Wa post is praising him...
But I don't have the stomach to read the whole thing...
she's the one who is happy because she thinks there are no Christians in NYC...
Why should we? The Brits don't.
Maybe the author will poll those attending prayers in the mosques tomorrow. Surely they are glad to see him here!
Geeze, the author of this non article needs to really, really get a life.
You can add to the list; his advocation of a return to farming with a crapload of applied pesticides, and his idiocy about global warming.
The royal lines of europe and Britain have inbred themselves to withing one chromosome of complete lunacy.
I should have quoted that, but can't remember which Brit said it. Not being Joe Biden at all here.
I could care less who he sleeps with or without. Diana was probably a sweet person, but always seemed to me a rather dim bulb. Camilla is no beauty, but I can understand the attraction to a woman who (obviously) doesn't spend all day primping.
Same here.
The Prince and the Duchess have proceeded ceremoniously from one event to the next like harlequins at a convention for the colour-blind.
... dozed through a dinner of celery broth and medallions of buffalo.
Geez, you scared me with the hairdo thing.
; )
Yawn.
The only thing that interests me about this visit is how long it will be inflicted on the USA.
Oh, is that what my hair's doing today.
The Royal Family- because it's interesting to see what generations of inbreading produce.
The only time I care about the British royal family is in the case that I'm reading about their many antics in People magazine or ogling Prince Charles' sons in the same magazine (Those boys are lucky they take after their mum). My theory is that the British people keep the Windsors around so that they have someone readily available to laugh at and gossip about.
It wasn't anti-USA - if it was he would not have mentioned the reality of the Libby affair.. and would have spun it like a Dem wet dream.
Scooter Libby, a hitherto anonymous assistant to Vice-President Dick Cheney, now in trouble for apparently lying to a grand jury about a crime that never was;
Worse still for the Prince, he’s come at a time when it’s suddenly become hip to be dull, and yet he still can’t cut it.
I wonder who the Prince identifies with the most.....
George Galloway, or Christopher Hitchens?
That tells me all I need to know.
When Americans say "the royal _______" it's an epithet.
As if we don't have enough depressing desolation around here, Chuck and his Mare are coming to N.O. to 'see the destruction' for themselves.
Nothing like filthy-rich, inbred, adulterous 'Royals' having a photo-op in front of the remains of someones life to really make you feel all warm and 'wuvved'.
He'll probably look at the 6 story mound of debris that had been people's homes and possessions and cluck about how bloody awful it is to see all the trees that were broken and uprooted.
I don't know what his handlers were thinking, but this business about Charles giving Bush a talking-to went over like a you-know-what in the punch bowl.
Prince Charles isn't he the one that has fallen off the horses too many times?
Camilla seems more nice than Diana. Didn't Diana croak in France while partying with some Ayrab?
From the British perspective the London Times is pretty hostile to the British royal family and monarchy as the institution. Noe a surprising thing sice it is owned by Rupert Murdoch - a republican (small r).
The piece is the British way of expressing things "See Charles, even the Americans are ignoring you! Why should we let you become the head of state one day?"
An ignorant man who would never have made it in the real world and his ugly wife are visiting the US. We are underwhelmed.
an America ... would rise up in the spirit of 1776 and throw the monarchical chump out of the country
I would, if given the chance to do so, and had I been an American.
I thought the ole chap was spot on, too! Some people just don't know how to have a good chuckle these days!
This is British humour. As far as I know, British type of humour is night and day from American ones. The New Zealand government's ministry of foreign affairs and trade advises New Zealanders doing business with Americans that they should minimize the use of NZ jokes (which are very related to British humour) because few Americans would understand it.
"Britain and America are two countries separated by a common language.". The saying has nothing truer manifestion in the use of humour.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.