House Approves 'ANTI-HATE' Bill Amendment

National Prayer Network ^ | Sept. 26 2005 | Rev. Ted Pike

[savagesusie]

Actually that study is an opinion....

Actually, you are wrong....The studies prove that not only are homosexuals much more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexuals, they also support NAMBLA (and RuthBaderGinsburg) who think it is fine to have sex with children. Most homosexuals have been introduced into the lifestyle by being molested by an older homosexual......they are psychologically disordered....

The Pope is correct and it only encourages more child molestations by endorsing homosexuality.

BTW, do you really think it is heterosexuals that sodomize young boys?

[MoochPooch]

Well, you have to admit, gays are really into love.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Not a word for 25 hours, then I am replied to by three members in a 48 minute gap of time.

It's really sad when you have create member accounts to make someone think that other people agree with you.

By the way, it's didn't work and I stand by my statement that 'sample' studies are junk science.

[Paloma_55]

Those members have been around for a while. One of them sent me a private reply.

I think that your argument got progressively worse until it was blatantly obvious to even the most casual observer "most <> all" at which point, they could not help themselves.

I doubt your paranoid fantasy is founded, but it looks like a better exit strategy than continuing down your flawed argument path.

[savedbygrace]

Yup. Planning to do just that.

[ReyDM]

Well don't just give up. If everyone on this forum writes/emails/calls the White House, there is at least a chance that Pres. Bush will veto this garbage.

I seem to recall that Clinton vetoed several bills that weren't "clean", i.e. had un-related riders or amendments attached. There is plenty of justification here for Bush to do just that.

[MineralMan]

"Well don't just give up. If everyone on this forum writes/emails/calls the White House, there is at least a chance that Pres. Bush will veto this garbage."

It's worth a try. But remind me: what was the last bill that President Bush vetoed?

[little jeremiah]

Create accounts? You mean I'm really DBeers and savagesusie?

I'd say you have an overly creative mind. You're living in a different world than the real one. A world where you delete all negative information about homosexuality. But your mind is not the arbiter of objective truth.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420619/posts
Root Causes, Homosexual Consequences

[trubluolyguy]

Hmmm yeah tell me again why I should go vote Republican again?

---

Couldn't tell ya other than they will lead us into socialism more slowly than the Democrats?

[Always Right]

It won't survive the court challenge, but write your Senator and demand a no vote.

Just where is this mythical court that would overturn this?

[DBeers]

It's really sad when you have create member accounts to make someone think that other people agree with you.

Check your mirror -I suspect tin foil head covering... Your conspiracy argument is about as valid as your pro-homosexual argument. Both are subjective -just as subjecticve as many points in the debate over the homosexual disorder and or the opposition or support of the homosexualization of society and or the normalcy of homosexuality... SUBJECTIVE howvever, subjective with one caveat that applies here at FR -tada-

-- your statements -the pro-homosexualization of society arguments are not welcome here nor is the debate regardless how 'valid' you 'feel' the science...

What Free Republic is all about:

Statement by the founder of Free Republic

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.

Free Republic is private property. It is not a government project, nor is it funded by government or taxpayer money. We are not a publicly owned entity nor are we an IRS tax-free non-profit organization. We pay all applicable taxes on our income. We are not connected to or funded by any political party, news agency, or any other entity. We sell no merchandise, product or service, and we offer no subscriptions or paid memberships. We accept no paid advertising or promotions. We are funded solely by donations (non tax deductible gifts) from our readers and participants.

We aggressively defend our God-given and first amendment guaranteed rights to free speech, free press, free religion, and freedom of association, as well as our constitutional right to control the use and content of our own personal private property. Despite the wailing of the liberal trolls and other doom & gloom naysayers, we feel no compelling need to allow them a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is not a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists dedicated to defending our rights, defending our constitution, defending our republic and defending our traditional American way of life.

[bigdcaldavis]

Well, judging by FreeRepublic's statement of what it opposes, FreeRepublic will be banned by MiniLuv (Ministry of Love, aka the "thought police"/"hate speech nazis") as hate speech.

[DBeers]

LOL -yes we tend to be non PC!