Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: Gaza: Where People Are Puppets on a String - It would be simpler if clear titles were private
Wall Street Journal ^ | August 23, 2005 | GEORGE MELLOAN

Posted on 08/23/2005 6:13:41 AM PDT by OESY

...The U.N. took on the Mideast as one of its first big projects after World War II and, unfortunately, has never left. After granting Israel statehood in 1948, the U.N. turned to the Arabs the Israelis had defeated in battle. Under Resolution 302, the General Assembly in 1949 created the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). Today, it is the largest U.N. bureaucracy, with 25,000 employees providing health care, schooling and social services to some 4 million Palestinians in 59 refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza.

The concrete hovels in these camps long ago became breeding grounds for Arab radicalism. The militant Arab socialist states that gained ascendancy under Soviet tutelage in the 1960s and 1970s wanted it that way....

The early Zionists, who like many central European Jews saw socialism as a means of escaping the pogroms of Europe's class systems, also gravitated toward collectives. Indeed, it can be argued that the Israeli kibbutzim were the only form of communism that ever achieved economic success for any sustained period.

So when the Jewish state was established, it was heavily socialist. The level of central planning was such that immigrants were guided to suitable communities and assigned economic roles to play. Almost all land was state owned. Israelis have built a vigorous private-enterprise economy on top of this inhospitable edifice. But many artifacts of the old system remain.... Over 54% of the country's gross domestic product is accounted for by government expenditures....

The Israelis are bulldozing the settlements, ostensibly to prevent their use by terrorists. Most of the land they occupied, as with... all land in Gaza, will be owned by the PA. About 5% will revert to private hands, but that will be a dodgy process....

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abbas; arabs; bolton; centralplanning; egypt; gaza; jerusalem; jewishsettlers; jordan; kibbutzim; knesset; lebanon; netanyahu; palestinians; pogroms; refugees; settlements; sharon; syria; turks; un; unrwa; westbank; willliamward; zionists

1 posted on 08/23/2005 6:13:54 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY

bttt for later...rto


2 posted on 08/23/2005 6:19:45 AM PDT by visitor (...and the dems wonder why they lost and will continue to lose, good riddance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
UN is the tool that officiated over a "Oil for rotten Food" scam, providing old Saddam the dollars to reimburse families the going price of a offspring homicide bomber.

One evil sick system.
3 posted on 08/23/2005 6:21:47 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
First the Nazi's dislocated the Jews. Now the Israeli government dislocates the Jews. Then the Nazi's sent in troops and tanks. I have not been following these events closely enough, but I have heard mention of bull dozers. Is the Israeli government going to flatten the buildings and other improvements before turning over the land to the Palestinians? How is it that governments can lose complete contact with reality? What do they put in the water of politicians? What or who is the "they"? Is it simply that power drives men mad?
4 posted on 08/23/2005 6:36:02 AM PDT by Reaganghost (Our freedoms will never be safe as long as a single Democrat holds elected public office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganghost
It is more bizarre than you realize. In part, the Israelis are bulldozing the settlements at the covert request of the Palestinian Authority because they recognize that their own crooks and gunmen would grab them for themselves and discredit the PA and that the quality of the housing would be a dispiriting revelation to many Palestinians. The Israelis probably also regard the bulldozing as a way to demonstrate that the Palestinians cannot expect to take Israel intact, which is a fantasy peddled by many Palestinian leaders.
5 posted on 08/23/2005 6:44:30 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Before it's over, governments are going to succeed in giving the anarchists a good name.


6 posted on 08/23/2005 6:49:05 AM PDT by Reaganghost (Our freedoms will never be safe as long as a single Democrat holds elected public office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

..........................................

7 posted on 08/23/2005 7:00:00 AM PDT by SJackson (I went to the intifada, and all I got was a UN T-Shirt, Hugh Hewitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Interesting points. The early Israel was heavily Socialist in nature because early European Zionists came out of a bizarre nationalist/Marxist background. Other "nationalist" movements, such as the Basque and Irish movements, which were originally conservative and traditional in nature (basically nostalgic and anti-industrial fantasies), also turned social and Marxist in nature.

There are probably two things that made Israel able to overcome this: for one thing, while many ZIonists were more political than religious, there was no way of eliminating the religious aspect of Judaism; and, secondly, the Jews who went to Israel as colonists came from all over Europe, including from countries that had already experienced the glories of Marxism, and they were probably less entranced by the five year plan than many in the original Zionist movement.

But it's interesting to consider the effect that this residual Socialism may have had on Israel, both then and now.


8 posted on 08/23/2005 8:21:00 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thanks for the ping.


9 posted on 08/23/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Where to start. There is so much wrong with this article. I am surprised at the Journal.

First there are religious reasons for the way land ownership is structured in Israel - as leases not privately ownership. Mr Melloan should check the Bible for further information on Shmittah and Jubilee (Yovel). This is not socialism but the Jewish State adhering to the Bible.

http://www.ou.org/Chagim/shmitah.htm

“But many artifacts of the old system remain. The three major banks are state controlled -- although Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched an effort to break them up before he resigned to protest the Gaza pullout."

You need a new fact checker Melloan. The bank monopoly was broken by Mr Netanyahu and approved by the Knesset in early August.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/31273fac-044f-11da-a775-00000e2511c8.html

“Over 54% of the country's gross domestic product is accounted for by government expenditures.’

Now that’s just sloppy. Did you break that down into Military expenditures which are a huge expense and percentage of Israel’s GDP?

“Under Resolution 302, the General Assembly in 1949 created the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). Today, it is the largest U.N. bureaucracy, with 25,000 employees providing health care, schooling and social services to some 4 million Palestinians in 59 refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza.”

No mention of UNRWA is meaningful without mentioning that it is unique, a one of a kind UN agency. No other relief group in the UN has existed for anywhere near that long nor gotten even close to that much money. The boondoggle that is UNRWA, replete with monetary amounts and corruption that would make Oil for Food look like an honest operation, has gone on for 56 years. This agency has been a lifetime career for many a UN employee. And for what? Refugee camps are cesspools of terror and bomb factories. Mr Bolton are you listening?


‘The Israelis are bulldozing the settlements, ostensibly to prevent their use by terrorists.”

No. the Palestinians requested the destruction because they want high intensity housing not the small private homes the Israelis lived in.

“But there can be little doubt that many Gazans had mixed feelings about the withdrawal as they observed the glee of the masked, armed Hamas terrorists who may soon be their new masters.”

Dream on. Have you any idea of the popularity of the Intifada and of suicide bombings among Palestinians? Further Hamas is better liked in Gaza than the corrupt PA and Fatah.


10 posted on 08/23/2005 2:34:07 PM PDT by dervish (tagline for rent, inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

2. All sales of land were returned to the original owner in the 50th year. Thus, there were only leases of property for periods up to 49 years; there were no sales "in perpetuity" of parcels of land in the Land of Israel. "For the Land is Mine; you are only temporary residents and settlers together with me. (Lev. 25,23)"

http://www.ou.org/Chagim/shmitah.htm


11 posted on 08/23/2005 2:37:04 PM PDT by dervish (tagline for rent, inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson