Posted on 08/09/2005 10:36:39 AM PDT by smoothsailing
I would say that some RINOs are better then liberals. In states that would otherwise elect Dems (NY, Maine, etc), the RINOs are OK. But in a place like Arizona or South Carolina, that could otherwise elect republicans, having senators like McCain and Graham is a bad thing.
Interesting article on Pirro and her husband, the albatross. She shares the kind of husband Geraldine Ferarro would understand.
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?category=CAPCONF&storyID=378055&BCCode=&newsdate=7/11/2005
IF you want a pro-Life strong conservative Republican on all issues to win in New York State commit to making that a reality.
Committment does not mean urging to vote against either, when it's guarenteedone will win.
Committment is to follow the Goldwater/Reagan model.
Goldwater lost.
Reagan lost his bid for president a few times before he won the nomination.
It took years to take the House. Etc..
You don't get a conservative strong across the board conservative Republican by spouting off rhetoric and refusing to vote. I want to know if New Yorkers are committed to whining about not having what they want when they want it, or if they are ready to devote the next forty years to turning that state around. If not, then you have no room for complaint.
"Heard this morning that she is one hell of a debator and she can wow them on TV. No more walk in the park for Hillary!"
Not to mention she is way better looking than Hitlery.
One thing is the money.The pundits estimate Hillary will raise 100 mil for the presidential run but may have to spend 40 mil against a tough senate challenger.
My guess is the Clinton camp has been blind-sided by the Pirro challenge.No one was expecting it!
LOL...so true. Bill's wicked ways far surpass anything any mafioso could do.
Hillary's in trouble.
Just because we may disagree on some issues, it doesn't mean that Jeanine doesn't deserve our support to wound and hopefully stop Hillary Clinton dead in her tracks.
One has to take into consideration just what another Clinton presidency would mean for America, socially, morally, legally and ethically. Not to mention National defense and security for all our children,present and future.
Different races are about different things. This race is not about one or two social issues.
Jeanine is a woman, and can attack Hillary the way no man can. She can flush out Hillary on her conversion to the Death Penalty.
This is Earth. We have to play with the cards we are dealt.
True, but in New York and Massachusets, you take what you can get, not what you want in a perfect world. So, Go Pirro!
Remember,even Ronaldus Magnamus was once pro-choice.
Also, and this is no small thing, Pirro has the looks and personality that will appeal to upscale suburban soccer moms, in comparison with the haggard and phony-looking Hillary with her off-the-rack pantsuits and sweaters and pearls. Pirro dresses like a real New York professional woman. She wears hip, high-fashion suits with skirts, high heels, and correct makeup. She is what New York women are or would like to be.
I agree...Pirro's a winner. Constipated Hillary in a wide pantsuit and wide flats cannot compete with perky Pirro, tough on crime and supportive of the Patriot Act.
I am pro-life, anti-gay marriage, and pro second amendment.
Pirro will get my vote. Anything to get and keep Hillary out of office.
We have to get her out, that is all that matters to this NY voter.
Yes she is much better looking. I'm a female and I would rather see Pirro's pretty face than that old hag on TV any day!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.