Posted on 08/09/2005 10:36:39 AM PDT by smoothsailing
Heard this morning that she is one hell of a debator and she can wow them on TV. No more walk in the park for Hillary!
What is a way-station?
one rabid pro-abort or another, does it really matter?
I'll be doing my best to encourage fellow NYers to vote for "none of the above" ...
Make no mistake about it, she's T-O-U-G-H.
Couldn't be worse for Hillary, because if she were running against a man, she could play the gender card and get a free pass from the libs.
I think a catfight (no offense intended) would be sooooo fun to watch--and even the lib media would be compelled to cover it.
bttt
ping.
Short-sighted foolishness. If you vote for none-of-the-above, you pass Hillary along to the rest of the country. At least Pirro would only be 1 voice in the Senate. Keep your eye on the big picture, bub.
Pirro is a much better debator than Hillary. She has spent many years as a prosecutor and actually practicing law while Hillary has been riding on the coattails of her husband and plotting her presidential run. Pirro is a true blue New Yorker, and I think when people see them debate, Hillary will be exposed for the fake snake that she is. As much as I hate to say this, a pro-choice rhino has a much better chance at taking Hillary out than a true conservative. We ARE talking about New York!!! Baby steps people!!!
So true in NY. In NY's higher offices, that is the only type that could be elected.
Let me ask you this, do you think the babies scheduled for slaughter today, tomorrow, and in the future give a damn about the differences between two people who would refuse to "stay" their execution?
Do you think these unborn children give a crap when they are torn apart alive, limb from limb?
Both of these people don't belong in office.
>>you pass Hillary along to the rest of the country
Hillary can win despite Pirro.
I know she is not a real conservative at all, but if I were in the position, I would support her because a pretty tough campaign by Pirro would damage hillary, the worst American politician in 50 years
It's a shame she's pro-abortion, but let's face it: the Senate isn't going to touch the issue of abortion for years, but homeland security will be priority number 1 for some time.
That's right! I mean, look how valuable Arlen Specter is to the Republicans! Don't let little things like principle get in the way of voting in as many people with R after their name as possible! That's how you accomplish your agenda! By ignoring it in the people you elect!
>>As much as I hate to say this, a pro-choice rhino has a much better chance at taking Hillary out than a true conservative. We ARE talking about New York!!! Baby steps people!!!
How about [politically] stepping on babies in a bid to the White House? Pirro or Hillary would [politically] be glad to do that. These two will proably fight to see who is the most pro-abortion....
I wish I lived in New York during this campaign. What fun to watch.
>> the Senate isn't going to touch the issue of abortion for years, but homeland security will be priority number 1 for some time.
Really? You think Supreme Court Justice nominations have nothing to do with Abortion? The Senate is already poised to deal with this, idirectly, with current and near term nominations...
(shaking head)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.