The American Right Must Get Off The Pot on Israel, War, and Draft

Al-Jazeerah ^ | 5-26-05 | Mark Dankof

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

Al-Jazeerah has the best headlines!

[gogipper]

Where's Barf Alert?

[SJackson]

Where's Barf Alert?

The author is a Constitutional Party Senate candidate. I didn't want to offend anyone, so let Al-Jazeerah speak for itself.

[Rembrandt_fan]

What's your intent posting this? Your commentary doesn't make your purpose clear. Writing, "Al-Jazeerah has the best headlines!" can be construed a number of ways. Sarcasm would be nice. Here's hoping.

[Borges]

Paleocons are uniting with Al Jazeera eh? Sigh.

[dighton]

Where's Barf Alert?

The name Mark Dankof should suffice.

(General, I'm sobbin' over this broken graphic link! Your text is still a classic.)

[SJackson]

I think the article is hysterical. There's nothing wrong with seeing what a large chunk of the world reads about America. And unless there are two Mark Dankof's of similar mindset, the man's a former Senate candidate. For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there.

[gogipper]

The Mark of Zorro should suffice....

[SJackson]

The name Mark Dankof should suffice.

Maybe he thought they'd only publish it in arabic.

[cwb]

"One so grateful for the $5 billion a year in direct foreign aid subsidies received from the United States..."

---

While I'm not thrilled with any of this foreign aid...I wonder if the author has added up exactly how much it is that the Palestinians, Egyptians, Saudis, Turkey, etc, also receive from the US in aid. Hell, we are still paying for Camp David despite efforts from some in Egypt to destroy Israel.

[SJackson]

While I'm not thrilled with any of this foreign aid...I wonder if the author has added up exactly how much it is that the Palestinians, Egyptians, Saudis, Turkey, etc, also receive from the US in aid. Hell, we are still paying for Camp David despite efforts from some in Egypt to destroy Israel.

Israel doesn't get $5 billion, and no, he hasn't added it up because he doesn't care about foreign aid, he cares about Israel.

[Rembrandt_fan]

You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there."

What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.

[SJackson]

You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there." What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.

If you feel the Constitution Party and their candidates are bigots and have no place being mentioned on FR, I'm the wrong one to complain to. I'd suggest you bring their bigotry up when they're mentioned as an option, rather than when it's exposed.

[dighton]

For anyone who enjoys poking around in toxic waste dumps, put on your hazmat suit and go here.

[rmlew]

This SOB was a Constitution Party nominee for the Senate, and wrote for the Missouri Lutheran Synod.
Dankof is also one of the Dhimmi turning Libertypost.org into a anti-Jewish zone.

---

Dankof may oppose Muslim immigration, but he is still
a useful idiot for the Islamists. He writes for
Islamic Media (Iran Dokht, Al Bawaba, Nile Media, Al
Jazeerah) attacking the US, neoconservatives, and
Zionists.
http://www.markdankof.com/eckstein_reed.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/op-ed01.htm

Dankof sees Zionist Jews as having corrupted
Christians:
http://www.markdankof.com/trinity_mammon_zionism.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/family_values.htm
http://www.markdankof.com/dispensationalism.htm
http://www.lmsusa.org/tt-08-01.htm

Finally, there is an article where Dankof approves of
a book that supposedly shows the nexus between the
Mossad, Chinese intelligence, and Islamist terrorism
in controlling the US.
http://www.markdankof.com/seeds_of_fire.htm

Reading through Dankof's articles
(http://www.markdankof.com/articles.htm), it is clear
to me that this man is on a mission to tie Orthodox
Lutherans, American Nationalists, and Islamist
apologist together in a struggle against anyone who
would stand against Islamism.

Bush may be an idiot, but Dankof is evil. It is
unfortunate that the Constitution Party is tied to a
person like this.

Ron

[Rembrandt_fan]

It isn't for me to say who or what may or may not be posted here, and that isn't my point or purpose. You post a thinly veiled piece of antisemitic tripe attributed to one of those obscure third-party mouthpieces, and do so for reasons open to the widest possible interpretation: to show alternatives to the Republican Party. How about you personally? Where do you stand? Do you think these people represent a viable alternative? Do you agree with their stance concerning the 'Jewish Lobby'? Straight answers would be nice.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

SJackson wrote:

If you feel the Constitution Party and their candidates are bigots and have no place being mentioned on FR, I'm the wrong one to complain to. I'd suggest you bring their bigotry up when they're mentioned as an option, rather than when it's exposed.

Rembrandt_fan then wrote:

yada yada yada ending with Do you agree with their stance concerning the 'Jewish Lobby'? Straight answers would be nice.

Seems PRETTY. FRICKEN. OBVIOUS. what to me what SJackson is saying. The article is idiocy written by an idiot who is a member of a political party that is idiotic.

You are trying to debate a poster who completely agrees with you, and made it clear enough that even a child would understand. What do you do in your spare time, interrogate your houseplants?

[MarkL]

Wow, I'm shocked! Al Jazeera is saying that Jews are bad, Jews control Congress, etc...

Shocked, I say. And deeply saddened.

Mark