[SJackson]

I think the article is hysterical. There's nothing wrong with seeing what a large chunk of the world reads about America. And unless there are two Mark Dankof's of similar mindset, the man's a former Senate candidate. For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there.

[Rembrandt_fan]

You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there."

What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.

[torchthemummy]

"...the man's a former Senate candidate"

Your logic of his value reminds me of the old Dennis Miller joke about how Mondale only got 3 electoral votes: "That's just three more than I got...and I wasn't even running!"