Replies

You wrote, "For those looking for alternatives to the Republican Party, it's worth seeing what's out there." What's out there is what is commonly called the fringe, the political no-man's-land where anti-semites use creepy little code words like 'Jewish Lobby' to connote something older and darker. Lending credence to a man like Dankof because he's a 'former Senate candidate' is a kind of logical misdirection, a false attribution of qualities normally associated with men and women of real stature and merit. Should I take whackjobs like Lyndon LaRouche seriously because he's a former presidential candidate? That's the rationale you're selling and I, for one, am not buying it. Keep the bigotry off the board.

If you feel the Constitution Party and their candidates are bigots and have no place being mentioned on FR, I'm the wrong one to complain to. I'd suggest you bring their bigotry up when they're mentioned as an option, rather than when it's exposed.

It isn't for me to say who or what may or may not be posted here, and that isn't my point or purpose. You post a thinly veiled piece of antisemitic tripe attributed to one of those obscure third-party mouthpieces, and do so for reasons open to the widest possible interpretation: to show alternatives to the Republican Party. How about you personally? Where do you stand? Do you think these people represent a viable alternative? Do you agree with their stance concerning the 'Jewish Lobby'? Straight answers would be nice.