Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(PRESIDENT)Bush Proposes Oil Refineries on Closed Military Bases
American Forces Press Service ^ | April 27, 2005 | Donna Miles

Posted on 04/27/2005 4:34:38 PM PDT by Dubya

WASHINGTON, April 27, 2005 – President Bush unveiled a plan today to encourage building oil refineries on military sites that have closed. Speaking at a Small Business Administration conference here, the president recommended this and other initiatives to address the country's energy needs and reduce dependence on foreign energy sources.

Bush said expanding refinery capacity will help address the shortage that's partly blamed for skyrocketing gasoline prices. The last oil refinery built in the United States was completed in 1976, he said.

During a White House press briefing today, spokesman Scott McClellan said the federal agencies would work with states and local communities to transfer closed military sites and make them available to refiners.

McClellan said many closed military bases are already being redeveloped or used for new purposes to help create jobs. Building oil refineries on some of them will "address a pressing problem that we face, and it will also address an economic need in these communities," he said.

"So we want to work closely with those communities and we think that by doing so, we will help encourage people to look at the long-term benefit in investing in these sites and building refineries," McClellan said.

Bush's announcement today came about two weeks before Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld submits a list of installations recommended for closure or realignment to Congress and the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission.

By Sept. 8, the commission must send its recommended BRAC list to the president, who has until Sept. 23 to approve or disapprove the findings.

News Archive http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2005/20050427_785.html


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brac; bush43; energy; energyplan; militarybases; refinery; sba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2005 4:34:39 PM PDT by Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dubya
Excellent idea. It'll drive the enviro wackos crazy and we can boost production of gas and heating oil......
2 posted on 04/27/2005 4:37:08 PM PDT by b4its2late (Junk is something you've kept for years and throw away three weeks before you need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

It would only make sense if the military bases were located on navigable rivers and had major oil and petroleum products pipelines nearby.


3 posted on 04/27/2005 4:37:10 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

4 posted on 04/27/2005 4:38:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Yep...you need infrastructure and water to get the job done..

MD


5 posted on 04/27/2005 4:38:32 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Hmmmm, Winter Harbor Maine sounds like an excellent choice. Both for the refinery and an LNG terminal.


6 posted on 04/27/2005 4:39:51 PM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Brilliant. Wait until all those NIMBY types face the choice!


7 posted on 04/27/2005 4:40:03 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Our President has come up with another brilliant idea. This should drive the Rats crazy!


8 posted on 04/27/2005 4:40:03 PM PDT by Lucky2 (Yankees all the way in 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Stick them on top of superfund cleanup sites, and kill two birds with one stone.


9 posted on 04/27/2005 4:40:21 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

It would make sense if the closed military bases were sitting on top of large oil reserves.


10 posted on 04/27/2005 4:41:11 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Matthew 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

Brilliant. It will drive all the NIMBYs insane trying to figure out a way to thwart it, and no doubt the 'rats are trying to come up with some sort of legislation that will prevent it--but it's brilliant.


11 posted on 04/27/2005 4:41:47 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976
Yep...you need infrastructure and water to get the job done..

Not just that, but you need oil.

12 posted on 04/27/2005 4:42:10 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Matthew 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
"The last oil refinery built in the United States was completed in 1976, he said."

But haven't the refiners been expanding existing facilities rather then developing new ones? Anyone???

13 posted on 04/27/2005 4:42:48 PM PDT by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
So the left wing Dem tree huggers have screwed us. Surprise, surprise.

We couldn't build refineries. We couldn't build nuclear plants.

Know what's worse? We let them. We let them stop us from doing what needed to be done 20 years ago.
14 posted on 04/27/2005 4:42:58 PM PDT by ryan71 (Speak softly and carry a BIG STICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Fore River Shipyard, Quincy Massachusetts. Philadelphia Shipyard. Long Beach. To name three off the top of my head.


15 posted on 04/27/2005 4:43:27 PM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Alameda, Mare Island, Moffitt field, are three that come to mind just in the SF Bay area.


16 posted on 04/27/2005 4:43:33 PM PDT by Michael.SF.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

My thought as well. Why clean up a base to put a refinery on top of it.


17 posted on 04/27/2005 4:44:48 PM PDT by Michael.SF.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

http://www.schoolscience.co.uk/content/4/chemistry/petroleum/knowl/4/2index.htm?refinery.html


18 posted on 04/27/2005 4:47:38 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

LOL. California hasn't built a power plant in decades, they've been leeching off the rest of the west.


19 posted on 04/27/2005 4:48:55 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Matthew 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Meldrim
Yeah but what about east port, i know no military bases but definitely fits other criteria and with s maine getting ready to lose BIW, you need to do something to counter act suzie ans oly's stupidity,
20 posted on 04/27/2005 4:49:22 PM PDT by dts32041 (Two words that shouldn't be used in the same sentence Grizzly bear and violate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson