Blogs Bristle at FEC's Internet Political Speech Proposal (this affects you)

Captain's Quarters ^ | 3/4/05 | Captain Ed

[chiller]

Captain's Quarters has started this ball rolling:

March 04, 2005 An Open Letter To The United States Senate

To the honorable Senators McCain and Feingold, et al:

I have read with considerable dismay the effect that your recent lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission, upheld by Judge Colleen Kollar-Ketelly, will have on political speech on the Internet. I write a political media-watchdog blog, Captain's Quarters, which enjoys a not-insubstantial daily readership. No one pays me to do this; I operate my site and write on topics purely from personal convictions and a deep desire to improve the world around me and make the nation stronger. I can unequivocally say the same about my many colleagues in the "blogosphere", both liberal and conservative.

Now we understand from Bradley Smith, one of the FEC commissioners, that your lawsuit forcing them to regulate speech on the Internet will have the effect of turning our efforts into in-kind contributions, especially when we provide hyperlinks back to candidate sites for referencing their positions and excerpt text from their on-line documents. Hyperlinks allow our readers to check our references to ensure our accuracy and context, and perform the hygienic task of holding our politicians accountable for their campaign practices. All of this not only should fall under the protection of the First Amendment, but it should be the primary reason for the First Amendment -- to protect and encourage free political speech and foster genuine debate.

Your legislation and the accompanying lawsuit that forced the FEC to regulate Internet political speech threaten all of that. If my links to political sites such as Georgewbush.com and Johnkerry.com counted as contributions and I was forced to accept responsibility for the cash value that the FEC designated to them, I would have been charged with several misdemeanors and possibly felonies, as I provided many such links during the past election cycle. During this cycle, my blog published over 680 essays on the presidential election. In fact, I linked to Senator Kerry's site four times as often as President Bush's site, which would have meant to the FEC that I was a major contributor to his campaign -- when in fact I opposed Senator Kerry and supported President Bush. These regulations would have forced me to retain the services of a full-time accountant and retain an attorney to understand when and where I overcontributed. At the very least, the burden of proof would be on me to make the FEC believe that my blog does not constitute in-kind contributions subject to the limits imposed on both hard and soft money contributions.

The effect of this would have been to force me to shut down my blog, or convert it to something else. In fact, it would have caused me less legal heartache to convert my site to a porn blog and do nothing but post hard-core pictures all day long. In the twisted environment of the McCain-Feingold Act, that kind of website would enjoy greater First Amendment protection than my political speech, a result for which every single Senator should feel shame and outrage.

Each of you should read the Constitution you swore to uphold and defend, and reflect on the unequivocal language of our forefathers:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

We may debate about the effect of unregulated cash on our electoral system, but if this new FEC effort comes to pass, the only people debating will be the corporate-owned media and the politicians. The rest of us will have been effectively bound and gagged, unable to contribute in any way thanks to the efforts of those who fear their own constituents. You can be assured that none of us in the blogosphere will fail to recognize those who do not act to defend our rights to free and unfettered political speech, and regardless of political party, none of us will rest until those voices of repression are stripped of office by the voters they hold in such low regard.

I, for one, will not be daunted by your attempts to stifle us. My many friends and colleagues on both sides of the political aisle stand as ready as I to defend the Constitution. We demand a hearing on McCain-Feingold, with open testimony before the press and our colleagues, and we demand action to reform or repeal this dangerous and un-American muzzle on political speech.

We await your response, sirs.

Edward Morrissey Captain's Quarters

UPDATE: A lot of these e-mails have bounced back. Apparently, our public servants don't like direct e-mail and require people to hit their websites to send them messages. At Town Hall, they have a Web form set up to do this, but many of the autoresponses indicate that they will not reply to messages sent from constituents outside their state.

Here's where you can help me out. Please copy my letter above and paste it into a message with an introduction of your own and send it to both Senators from your home state. That way we can be sure that all 100 Senators not only see this letter but your endorsement of it.

Thank you for your continued support!

[chiller]

This issue needs attention. I think JimRob would agree.

[MizSterious]

"Chiller"--would also be a good description for this "proposal." It's a real chiller, alright.

[chiller]

Certainly is. I smell civil disobedience.

[chiller]

Democrats, yes. But are we as certain that democrat legislators are equally opposed?

[lafroste]

Democrats are against this too.

Freepers and DU agreeing on an issue? Welcome to a brave new world.

[mewzilla]

Legislators on the left and right will favor this. Anything to protect incumbency. Lust for power can make strange bedfellows.

[YOUGOTIT]

They do not read or even look at email. They have an automatic answering service that thanks you for your email. I have found the best way is to go to Congress.org and have letters hand delivered. The cost is low and you can have the same letter delivered to your two senators and to your rep for one price. (This is not an advertisement it is how I handle letters to my elected reps.)

[peacebaby]

I would think the uproar by MoveOn.org etal would kill this bill.

[agitator]

In case anybody is interested, which I doubt, see who's being interviewed here and when:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1356016/posts

[Congressman Billybob]

I don't just "smell" civil disobedience, I am planning on it, counting on it, and prepared to do it. But first we have to see whether Congress and the FEC will be this stupid -- and act this unconstitutionally. I'll keep my power dry.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Death in a Courtly Manner"

[Leatherneck_MT]

Freepers and DU agreeing on an issue? Welcome to a brave new world.

The world in Chaos, dogs and cats sleeping together..

What strange bedfellows this communist legislation has created.

[watchdog_writer]

It would be nice of the writer were to post the link for or the specific text of the bill that he complains about.

Perhaps someone will fill in the gap if the writer can't.

I apologize for not being up to date on the status of the bill, but I assume from the post the writer is referring to the campaign finance bill introduced by our friend the good senator from Arizona, Hon. John McCain? Exactly how can the bill regulate the Internet? Who is trying to apply it to the Internet? Where and when did the hearing take place? What was the outcome? Wouldn't it be nice to know?

[NetValue]

Of course democrats want to regulate the internet. There are only two things they believe should not be regulated: homosexuality, and abortion.

[John W]

On its way to Bayh and Lugar.

[Uncle Miltie]

Can you say "unenforceable?"

I knew you could.

[watchdog_writer]

Democrats don't need the Internet, they have all they need with newspapers and television, and it's all free! It doesn't cost them a dime!

[chiller]

I'm right beside you, CBB. I haven't tasted civil disobedience since the '68 convention.

[mewzilla]

Just the fact that they're even thinking about should scare the snot out of every citizen.

It's good for citizens to be a little afraid of their government, but when a government loses all fear of its citizenry...we, the people, are in big trouble.

[Area51]

Johhny Mc Me doesn't give a shit what you think, He is fine with his Keating 5 connections, money, perks etc. and how dare you question him.

John McCain is an Traitor to his country. Pure and simple. NO one raises his right hand and takes an oath as he did when entering the military to defend this country and then uses his position to squelch these freedoms for HIS OWN PERSONAL GAIN without there being some serious forces pushing him.