Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Danger: The Active Ingredient in Imported Drugs
GOPUSA ^ | January 28, 2005 | Kerri Houston

Posted on 01/28/2005 8:00:54 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

When Congress passed landmark Medicare reforms last year, critics opposed a provision banning Americans from buying "Canadian" prescription drugs and a study of the safety and cost benefits of cross border purchasing was mandated in the legislation.

For several years, healthcare policy analysts and health safety experts have produced a cacophony of powerful objections to importation based on worries about safety and pricing. Now adding to the din of serious concern comes this study from the Department of Health and Human Services produced by a respected, international expert panel that not only highlights the dangers of importation, but is likely to shift the tide of the debate.

"Safe Importation" is an oxymoron. It is impossible to achieve, and any politician claiming that importation can be safe knowingly speaks an untruth. The HHS report now gives them little room to wiggle and even fewer places to hide.

Released in mid-December, the report provides irrefutable evidence that banning what consumers believe are "Canadian" drugs protects Americans from harm. The report also dispels another vote-garnering argument proffered by pro-importation politicians by casting doubt that Canadian drugs are cheaper.

In analyzing the effects of legalizing importation from non-U.S. sources, a critical finding of the study echoes concerns of importation opponents that drugs purchased from "Canada" are often not, in fact, Canadian.

As many as 70% of Internet websites that have the appearance of being in Canada, aren't. They are not peddling U.S.-made drugs returned from Canada. Their drugs are produced in unsafe, unsanitary facilities in places such as India, the Dominican Republic and Pakistan. They are either minimally effective or outright counterfeits with no active ingredients.

And the American patient ordering from his computer has little chance of detecting that his drugs come from foreign manufacturers or criminal counterfeiters.

Demonstrating its own concerns, Health Canada refuses to vouch for the quality of drugs that flow through Canada to the U.S. Its position is that the country receiving foreign prescription drugs bears responsibility for the quality of those drugs. The Canadian Government echoes the concerns of its Health Department and goes even further, questioning whether or not to continue allowing Canadian pharmacies to export drugs to the U.S. at all.

Canadian officials recognize that the drug supply of some 30 million Canadians cannot possibly fill the needs of nearly 300 million Americans. It recognizes that this supply deficit is a gilded invitation for bad actors to ramp up counterfeit drug importation schemes.

The Canadian Health Minister, Ujjal Dosanjh, has repeatedly stated that Canada "cannot be the drugstore of the United States" and threatened to impose new regulations that would essentially bar the sales of actual Internet pharmacies by the end of January.

Legalizing importation would ensure that Americans take drugs from unknown sources for which nobody has taken responsibility. That, says the HHS report, is a prescription for disaster. "Many transactions," the report offers, "are occurring via poorly regulated and occasionally bogus Internet operations that have been documented ... to provide consumers with inferior products."

That prescription drugs from unverifiable sources are dangerous is no surprise. But few anticipated that the report would find that Canadian prescription drugs are not necessarily cheaper than their American counterparts.

"That most imported drugs are less expensive than American drugs is generally not true," the report states. It concluded that generic drugs, most widely used by Americans, are usually less expensive here in the U.S. and that lower prices can be found simply by shopping around or utilizing readily available prescription drug discount cards.

The study's authors contend that the enormous - and impossible - expense of screening imported drugs would more than offset any cost savings. "The public rightly expects that ... imported drugs [would] be safe and effective," they wrote. "Substantial resources would ... be needed to ensure adequate inspection of imported drug products."

The study raises yet another red flag for Americans seeking "Canadian" prescription drugs and confirms that there is no balance between safety and cost, no compromise appropriate. The U.S. has the safest drug supply in the world, and importing danger based on false cost concerns is simply not worth the risk.

HHS demonstrated once and for all that a Canadian drug cure-all is a hazardous myth. With such overwhelming evidence of the dangers inherent in legalizing importation, it is unconscionable that any politician would continue to play Russian roulette with the integrity of our medicine supply.

Bang?

We will just have to wait and see.

-----------

Kerri Houston is Vice President of Policy for Frontiers of Freedom and Executive Director of its Project for the American Healthcare Century.

--------------------

Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; canadiandrugs; drugs; health; healthcare; imitations; imports; prescriptiondrugs; prescriptions; protection; ripoffs; security; usa; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
Things that make you go "hmmmm..." Canadian drugs NOT cheaper than American ones? Canadian drugs not actually being Canadian. Seems there is some sense in banning imports, for now. Hopefully, it won't have to be this way forever.
1 posted on 01/28/2005 8:00:54 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; aristeides; Askel5; ...

Drug safety PING!


2 posted on 01/28/2005 8:01:44 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Legalize stupidity fer adults...the Drug War is Counter-Productive...MUD


3 posted on 01/28/2005 8:06:53 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (Create a new League of Nations, a LeagueOfFReeNations!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is a loser issue for the GOP. Give me a break - they're really worried about safety!!!!

I wish the GOP would go back to being for limited gov't. This is pure pandering to the drug industry. Makes me sick - better order me some of them there counterfeit drugs!
4 posted on 01/28/2005 8:08:18 PM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al_again
I wish the GOP would go back to being for limited gov't. This is pure pandering to the drug industry.
Unfortunately many of the "GOP" are corporate bought lackeys - willing to peddle whatever legislation benefits their benefactors.
5 posted on 01/28/2005 8:11:55 PM PST by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

LOL The spin continues! Big Drug Company lobbying buying our politicians.

The drugs we order from the CanadianDrugstore.com are made in the USA..same brand, same ingredients, same packaging.

Nice try, spinmeisters, but we know better.


6 posted on 01/28/2005 8:12:08 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

I realize that most politicians are in the back pocket of someone - but do they need to be so damn obvious about it???


7 posted on 01/28/2005 8:15:33 PM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Hrmm...maybe it's all the "Canadian" medicine that's made people up here so damn liberal...


8 posted on 01/28/2005 8:18:08 PM PST by SweetPilotofCanuckistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Let's see, we have adults buying sweat-shop, underground products from Pakistan, through an outlet in Canada, for about the same price they could be obtained across the street, and they're going to give this stuff to their kids.

That's where "your tax dollars at work" is going to start. It'll be a public hospital and Medicaid that has to take care of that kid after mom and pop are tossed into jail fro trying to kill him.

9 posted on 01/28/2005 8:21:02 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The GOP is for free trade...expect when it comes to protecting drug companies.


10 posted on 01/28/2005 8:21:21 PM PST by Goldwater4ever (Voted early, voted often... for Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al_again

BTW, even if you pulled the federales OUT you'd still have state governments involved, and in different ways.


11 posted on 01/28/2005 8:22:05 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

Yup. We need a 3rd party.


12 posted on 01/28/2005 8:23:24 PM PST by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

You forgot to apend the "sarcasm" tag. This forces me to believe that you'd accept the word of an internet site over that of your friendly, neighborhood pharmacist.


13 posted on 01/28/2005 8:23:32 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"...we have adults buying sweat-shop, underground products from Pakistan, through an outlet in Canada, for about the same price they could be obtained across the street, and they're going to give this stuff to their kids."

Who is it that's gonna give drugs to kids?! I'm all fer increased use of voluntary drug testing fer Young'uns and adults who have jobs where that can't afford to be stoned...but all these nightmare scenarios yer envisoning when/if pot is legalized would already be happening considering the easy availability of the loco weed.

FReegards...MUD

14 posted on 01/28/2005 8:25:34 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (Create a new League of Nations, a LeagueOfFReeNations!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Until there is some evidence that imported drugs are harming the health of Americans in considerable numbers, the case is still the null set to ban the imports. Perhaps the "solution" is to have imported drugs pass some "provenance" test. An outright ban is simply a scheme to preserve the two tier pricing system, and subsidize Japan, Canada and Western Europe for the fruits of American drug research, paid for by Americans who fork over the higher tier price. This disgusting and nauseating system cannot and should not stand.
15 posted on 01/28/2005 8:26:02 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seems there is some sense in banning imports, for now.

What about banning imported vegetables?

16 posted on 01/28/2005 8:29:30 PM PST by A. Pole (Hash Bimbo: "Low wage is good for you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Didn't your mother warn you about abusing drugs?

This is the "Canada is the place to get pharmaceuticals", not the "Free Dope" thread!

17 posted on 01/28/2005 8:31:28 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seems there is some sense in banning imports, for now.

Keep the FDA out of this. It is called the free market. Freepers love it everywhere but here for some odd reason.

18 posted on 01/28/2005 8:32:07 PM PST by Nov3 ("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Raise the price.


19 posted on 01/28/2005 8:32:14 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Is that a bad thing?


20 posted on 01/28/2005 8:32:17 PM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson